Skip to main content

GAPDH spike RNA as an alternative for housekeeping genes in relative gene expression assay using real-time PCR

Abstract

Background and aim of study

qPCR is a robust technique which quantifies the expressions of target genes in relation to reference genes. Stresses such as virus infection or heat shock change expressions of many cellular genes including the reference genes, so the aim was to introduce a constant calibrator to normalize the data to.

Methodology

Constructed glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) plasmid was transcribed to GAPDH RNA and used as spike RNA. Spiked RNA samples were subjected to qPCR at different conditions such as virus infection, IFN treatment, or mild heat shock.

The results

Adenovirus hexon in interferon-deficient cells showed different expression levels when data were normalized to GAPDH or 18S. Consistently, hexon expression levels were different in untreated cells under the control or heat-shocked conditions when data were normalized to GAPDH or 18S. Promyelocytic leukemia protein II (PML-II) expression level was lower in HeLa-PML-II-deficient cells (PML-II-Kd) compared to the control when the data were normalized to GAPDH as a reference gene and also in GAPDH RNA spiked, which showed reasonable consistency. More consistent data were obtained when the GAPDH normalizer was added before the step of treating the extracted RNA with DNase compared to add it after the treatment or directly to the qPCR reaction.

Conclusion

The internal controls that were chosen for this study completely changed the experimental results since they were affected with the experimental conditions. However, GAPDH spike RNA level was stable in its amplification at different kinds of stresses. So it can be an alternative for housekeeping gene due to its stability at these different conditions.

Introduction

More than two decades ago, a video camera was used to monitor the amplification of DNA fragment over a course of thermocycling (Higuchi et al., 1993). The quantitative real-time PCR was firstly used to quantify the levels of cystic fibrosis transmembrane transduction regulator (CFTR) mRNA. Relying on 5′ exonuclease activity of Taq polymerase and tetrachlor-6-carboxy-fluorescen as a reporter dye, an internal probe was designed to detect the CFTR in real time with a parallel control that was detected using specific primer with a different internal DNA probe (Gibson et al., 1996).

Similar to many quantitative assays, qPCR has many troubleshootings either in PCR steps or in the fluorescence problems (Bustin, 2000). To quantify mRNA expression, researchers developed a method using SYBR green or recRNA or recDNA (Pfaffl & Hageleit, 2001).

In order to normalize the expression of any target gene, it is critical to choose the most stable gene which expression unaffected by different conditions or at least the conditions in a certain experiment. For example, GAPDH, β-actin, and 18S RNA are the most common housekeeping or control genes, but in all cases, it is necessary to optimize the conditions to choose the right control before starting. Prior to do the qPCR experiment, it is very important to choose a reference gene that does not change under the experiment conditions to ensure that the alteration in gene expression is due to the target gene not to the control gene (Livak & Schmittgen, 2001).

qPCR is a very sensitive assay, and it needs sequential steps starting from RNA or DNA extraction and reverse transcription and ending with the qPCR (Skern et al., 2005). In addition, there is no reference gene that stays stable over different types of stresses or cellular treatments even the very common reference genes such as GAPDH or β-actin. So these housekeeping genes were re-introduced as unreliable control genes as their expression is changing with treatments and alternatives were introduced to the field (Radonić et al., 2004). Virus infection as one kind of stress interferes with many cellular pathways, so it changes the regular expression of many genes including the housekeeping genes, such as the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection. HCMV infection alters the expression of wide range of genes responsible for repression and stimulation of cellular transcription and post-translational modifications (Kalejta & Shenk, 2002). So many studies started to detect the most stable reference gene during infection with different types of viruses in different cell lines (Radonić et al., 2005).

The reference or control could be an active control which gives a detectable signal during the qPCR run, and it could be internal or external; the internal is an RNA that is extracted in the same sample and the signal of the target gene is normalized to, while the external means adding a synthetic spike RNA or DNA to the extracted RNA and the data are normalized to that foreign nucleic acid (Livak, 1997).

Using external standard RNA is very important to compensate the function of the internal control as a constant calibrator (Jiang et al., 2011). Such artificial molecules are either made as aliens where they are made as pool sequences which do not belong to any known genome and cloned in a vector or they could be reference known-sequence gene that is cloned and added to the test samples artificially during the RNA extraction step. Despite that this RNA will be ideal for normalization as it will not be affected by treatment as the internal control does, it did not come from the same cells or tissues so it will need to be validated beforehand (Cronin et al., 2004; Huggett et al., 2005). Based on the need to build unbiased conclusions when analyzing gene expression by real-time PCR, the plan was to analyze the gene expression of some target genes under different types of stresses such as mild heat shock and adenovirus infection. So the aim was to analyze the expression of hexon (late adenovirus gene) and promyelocytic leukemia protein isoform II (PML-II) (interferon-regulating gene) under normal or slightly higher temperature normalized to selected housekeeping genes or to GAPDH spike RNA.

Materials and methods

Construction of GAPDH DNA plasmid

Genomic GAPDH insert was constructed from a subculture of HeLa cells which was used as a DNA source. DNA was extracted by column-based purification technique which was provided by Sigma-Aldrich GenEluteTM Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (G1N70). DNA samples were extracted by following the manufacturer’s instructions, and the eluted DNA was stored at − 20 °C. A fragment of 97 bp was amplified by GAPDH-specific primers using an Eppendorf Master Cycler Gradient Thermo-cycler and Taq DNA polymerase. The conventional PCR reaction mixture was prepared as follows:

 ReagentConcentration/amount
1DNA template50 ng/μl
2Forward and reverse primers1 μl of 20 mM
3dNTPs1 μl of 20 mM
4MgCl250 mM
5H2OCompleted to 50 μl

The thermal cycle was set as follows: 94 °C for 3.5 min, 30 s at 60 °C, and 7 min at 70 °C. Using QIAquick PCR purification kit, the amplified GAPDH was further purified according to the manufacturer’s directions. Ligation was achieved by mixing 2× pGEMT rapid ligation buffer (PGEM R-T Easy Vector Promega) at a ratio of 3:1 insert to vector in a total volume of 10 μl, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fifty percent of the mixture was used to transform 100 μl of E. coli competent DH5α cells and plated on. White-blue selection was achieved by preparing XGAL/IPTG LB ampicillin plates by mixing 40 μl of 20 mg/ml XGAL with 40 μl of 100 mM IPTG and spread on the surface of the sterile LB-Amp agar plates. Positive colonies (white) were grown in 5 ml of LB broth containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin for 16 h at 37 °C. The growth then used to purify GAPDH plasmids and purified using QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit and finally sent to GATC Biotech to determine correct DNA sequence (Atwan, 2016).

GAPDH plasmid linearization

The reaction mixture was prepared by mixing 4 μl of NEB 10× buffer, 2 μl of 500 ng/μl of GAPDH plasmid, and 1 μl of ECORI restriction enzyme, and the reaction was completed to 10 μl by H2O. The mixture then left at 37 °C in water bath for 1 h. The digestion was stopped by adding 0.5 μl of 0.5 M EDTA, 1 μl of 3 M Na acetate, and 20 μl of ethanol. The mixture then cooled at − 20 °C for 30 ‘, and the linearized DNA then precipitated by 14K micro-centrifuge for 15 ‘. Supernatant was removed, and the tube was re-spun again for few seconds to remove the residual liquid phase; then, DNA was re-suspended in H2O at a concentration of 1000 ng/μl.

In vitro transcription

All the kit reagents were briefly centrifuged before using, and all of them except the 10× reaction buffer were left on ice; then, the reaction mixture was prepared as in the table below:

The reagentAmount
ATP solution2 µl
CTP solution2 µl
GTP solution2 µl
UTP solution2 µl
10× reaction buffer2 µl
Linearized GAPDH plasmid1 μg
RNA polymerase enzyme mix2 μl
H2OTo 20 μl

The reaction was mixed thoroughly and briefly micro-centrifuged and was left at 37 for 8 h.

The reaction was stopped by adding 115 μl of H2O and 15 μl of ammonium acetate stop solution.

The RNA was purified using column kits provided by Promega SV total RNA isolation system z3100, and according to the manufacturer’s instructions, the purified RNA was then eluted with nuclease-free water at a concentration of 600 ng/μl measured by NanoDrop.

Stable transduced HeLa cells

Permanent PML-II depleted cells, control empty vector EV, or GFP cells were produced by genetic modification using the lentiviral system to deliver the anti-PML-II, EV, or GFP constructs into HeLa cell genome to investigate the function of PML-II gene in adenovirus life cycle (Atwan, 2016).

Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70)

Hsp70 mRNA in HeLa cells was transiently interfered with HSP70 siRNA (Atwan, 2016) to reduce the gene expression of HASA1 and HSPB1.

qPCR assay

PML-II, EV, or GFP cells were plated on at a density of 1 × 105 cell/ml; 24 h later, both types of cells were infected with adenovirus type 5 wild type with multiplicity of infection of 5. Twenty hours later, cells were washed with PBS, then were lysed and used as a source of adenovirus-infected RNA which was extracted by Promega SV total RNA isolation system z3100, and according to the manufacturer’s instructions, the purified RNA was then eluted with a nuclease-free water. The RNAs were DNase treated and reverse transcribed to cDNA by GoScriptTM reverse transcription system A5000 and according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Then, qPCR reaction was prepared by mixing 0.1 μl of 20 μM hexon and IFN forward and reverse primers, 10 μl of SYBR green reaction mix, and 0.3 μl (Agilent). For hexon and IFN gene expression, the adenovirus cDNA were used at a concentration of 5 ng/μl as the DNA template; the qPCR experiments were achieved by Stratagene MX3005P light cycler (Agilent Technologies) under 95 °C for 3 min, then cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 30 s at 95 °C thermal cycles. Cycle threshold and baseline values were determined using the machine software, and viral or cellular products were subjected to dissociation curve analysis to ensure primer specificity; all the primers which were used in this work are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 qPCR primer sequences

The data analyses were calculated as Cts after subtracting housekeeping gene Ct values from the gene of interest.

Results

Observation

One of the early observations during working with qPCR assays is the variation in the internal control amplification with the treatment. Genetically modified cells, and PML-II depleted and control cells GFP were used to analyze adenovirus gene expression. In a try to compare the expression of hexon, one of the late gene expressed proteins in adenovirus infected cell. Hexon expression showed dramatic variability in its mRNA level using different internal controls. In the first experiment, the hexon expression which is the target gene was expressed 3 Cts earlier in PML-II depleted cells compared to GFP control cells (Fig. 1) which is very expected as PML-II protein is regulating the interferon type I response (Chen et al., 2015). Despite this dramatic change in adenovirus hexon, when data were normalized to GAPDH as an internal control, the expression of hexon was roughly the same in both types of cell lines (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Hexon expression in PML-II depleted and GFP control cell lines normalized to GAPDH. Both cell types were plated at a density of 1 × 105/ml for 24 h. Cells were infected for 20 h at moi of 5 with human adenovirus type 5, RNA samples were extracted, and total hexon RNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using 10 ng/well of its (cDNA) as a template. Data were calculated by the ΔΔCt method, using GAPDH as internal control, and then normalized to the control cell value which was set to be 1

The whole biological experiment was repeated under the same conditions except the housekeeping gene normalizer. The GAPDH was replaced this time with 18S. In a clear consistency, the hexon mRNA expression appeared 3 Cts earlier than its expression in the control cells (Fig. 2). In contrast to the first experiment, there was a dramatic increase in hexon expression in PML-II depleted cells compared to the control after normalizing data to 18S (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Hexon expression in PML-II depleted and GFP control cell lines normalized to 18S. Both cell types were plated at a density of 1 × 105/ml for 24 h. Cells were infected for 20 h at moi of 5 with human adenovirus type 5, RNA samples were extracted, and total hexon RNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using 10 ng/well of its (cDNA) as a template. Data were calculated by the ΔΔCt method, using GAPDH as internal control, and then normalized to the control cell value which was set to be 1

Normalization of qPCR data under physical stress in control cells

Applying different kinds of treatment for the cell culture and quantifying the viral gene expression afterwards needed pre-optimization to consider results that welcome out of the qPCR assay. Both PML-II depleted and control cells were exposed to 40 for about 3 h then infected with adenovirus type 5 for 20 h before extracting RNA from the 2 types of cells and under treatment and normal conditions. Again, the data varied drastically depending on the chosen housekeeping gene. When hexon expression was normalized to GAPDH, it showed higher level at stress conditions compared to the control (Fig. 3), while it showed much lower expression at stress conditions compared to the control when the data were normalized to 18S as the reference gene (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure3

Hexon expression in GFP control cell lines normalized to GAPDH at 37 °C and 40 °C. GFP cells were plated at a density of 1 × 105/ml for 24 h. Cells were infected for 20 h at moi of 5 with human adenovirus type 5, RNA samples were extracted, and total hexon RNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using 10 ng/well of its (cDNA) as a template. Data were calculated by the ΔΔCt method, using GAPDH as internal control, and then normalized to the control cell value which was set to be 1

Fig. 4
figure4

Hexon expression in GFP control cell lines normalized to 18S at 37 °C and 40 °C. GFP cells were plated at a density of 1 × 105/ml for 24 h. Cells were infected for 20 h at moi of 5 with human adenovirus type 5, RNA samples were extracted, and total hexon RNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using 10 ng/well of its (cDNA) as a template. Data were calculated by the ΔΔCt method, using GAPDH as internal control, and then normalized to the control cell value which was set to be 1

Normalization to 18 in Fig. 4 is more accurate than in Fig. 3 as the internal control in both treated and non-treated samples as its Cts values changed within narrow range between 0.1 and 0.5 which seemed very stable compared to the GAPDH which varied in about 14 Cts. Additionally, the 18S normalized results showed good consistency with Atwan’s (2016) conclusion that the mild stress decreases adenovirus late gene expression which was confirmed by protein analysis.

Spiking RNA samples with synthetic spike RNA

In order to compare the stability of GAPDH mRNA expression, the PML-II mRNA level was measured in both PML-II depleted cells compared to the empty vector control cells. As it is expected, the PML-II depleted cells will have lower level of PML-II mRNA in comparison with control cells. In fact, this was the case in both unspiked and spiked samples despite the latter showed more dramatic effect as a consequence of PML-II m RNA depletion (Fig. 5a, b).

Fig. 5
figure5

PML-II expression in PML-II depleted and EV control cells. Cells were plated at a density of 1 × 105/ml for 24 h. RNA samples were extracted either directly or spiked with 1 ng of GAPDH RNA or left as a regular extracted RBA. Total PML-II RNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using 10 ng/well of its (cDNA) as a template. Data were calculated by the ΔΔCt method, using GAPDH as internal control, and then normalized to the control cell value which was set to be 1. a Normalized to GAPDH mRNA. b Normalized to spike GAPDH mRNA

Stage of adding the spike RNA

One of the important practical questions that need to be answered is at what stage one should contaminate the samples under investigation? To answer such question, it is important to try different stages of RNA extraction to rule out the right stage to work through. In this experiment, the spike RNA was added at the beginning of RNA extraction and before DNase treatment or after DNase treatment or added directly to the qPCR reaction well to investigate the level of interferon stimulated gene 56 (ISG56) in EV control cell line in the presence or absence of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70). Adding the spike RNA before DNase treatment showed difference in about 2 CTs in GAPDH message, and window of variance became narrower when spike RNA was added after DNase treatment and before reverse transcription step (Fig. 6). The GADH message changed between treated and untreated samples in about 0.8 Ct value. The last group of samples was contaminated with spike RNA when added to the well of qPCR reaction which showed no differences in the mRNA level which was considered as the control (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure6

ISG56 expression EV control cells. Cells were plated at a density of 1 × 105/ml for 24 h. HSP70 was depleted transiently from EV control cells (Atwan, 2016). RNA samples were extracted and spiked either directly and before DNase treatment or spiked or after DNase treatment before reverse transcription or spike RNA was added to the well of qPCR reaction after reverse transcribed separately. Total ISG56 RNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using 10 ng/well of its (cDNA) as a template. Data were calculated by the ΔΔCt method, using GAPDH as internal control, and then normalized to the control cell value which was set to be 1. a Normalized to GAPDHmRNA. b Normalized to spike GAPDH mRNA

Discussion

Clearly, it is not possible to find a reference gene that is stable under different conditions and treatments. The experiments showed instability in the expression of housekeeping genes that were selected in this study under different conditions. This is in consistent with publications since 16 reference genes were tested to determine the most stable genes in control kidney and sever or mild kidney tissue damage; only 4 of them were stable (Cui et al., 2009). Also, Among the 7 reference genes were tested in preeclampsia in diabetes, TATA box binding protein (TBP) and succinate dehydrogenase (SDHA) were the most stable ones (Meller et al., 2005). However, SDHA was registered a one of the most stable genes during early gonad development in mouse (Svingen et al., 2009). The same recommendation emerged from a study which concluded that at different canine articular tissues or its related diseases, it is critical to choose the most stable reference genes (Ayers et al., 2007).

An early observation was made when the data were changing and giving inconsistent results and the threshold values of GAPDH altered over multiple repeated experiments. In an agreement with what was mentioned by (Barber et al., 2005; Dheda et al., 2004), GAPDH as an internal control is drastically variable in 72 types of human tissues which showed that its level could be less in 15 times in breast cells than its level in skeletal muscle. In addition, it also varied from person to person despite its level was measured in the same tissue type (Barber et al., 2005). Furthermore, GAPDH variable expression gave false negative results re-IL4 expression levels in tuberculosis patients (Dheda et al., 2004). 18S is another internal control which was chosen to do the same relative assay instead of GAPDH, since its RNA subunits are the most stable housekeeping gene during different types of nutritional stresses in plants (Chen et al., 2016) or during long-term exposure to salts (Wang et al., 2014).

The study analyzed the data when they were normalized to either GAPDH or 18S to compare the conclusion in both cases. Unfortunately, adenovirus hexon expression drastically changed in the same cell line or in two different cell lines at both GAPDH or 18S normalizations.

GAPDH is preferable to be used as an internal control more than 18S in some kinds of tissues such as adipocyte or pre-adipocytes as it showed the most stable expression compared to a set of housekeeping genes which were selected to investigate the effect of treatment with hormones (Gorzelniak et al., 2001); however, none of them showed the same conclusion. Due to this inconsistency in analyzing data, the need emerged to find an alternative calibrator that is not affected with the treatment conditions in this study. Adding spike RNA or DNA to samples before extraction step to work as pseudo-housekeeping gene makes it possible to normalize the expression of target gene to the external RNA efficiently. The alternative proved that it could be a reliable calibrator especially after DNase treatment, and this agrees with using the foreign RNA in relative gene expression in blastocysts in preimplantation of embryos (Ivan Bower et al., 2007).

Conclusion

GAPDH spike RNA could be a good alternative to normalize the relative expression data when it is added during RNA extraction and after DNase treatment.

Availability of data and materials

The data are available for any further communication,

Abbreviations

IGF-1:

Insulin-like growth factor-1

PML-II-Kd:

HeLa-PML-II-deficient cells

BACT:

Beta actin

CFTR:

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane transduction regulator

EV:

Empty vector cells

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

GFP:

Green fluorescent protein

HCMV:

Human cytomegalovirus

HSP70:

Heat shock protein 70

IFN:

Interferon

IL4:

Interlekin-4

IPTG:

Isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside

ISG56:

Interferon stimulated gene 56

LB-Amp:

Lauria broth ampicillin

PML-II:

Promyelocytic leukemia protein II

SDHA:

Succinate dehydrogenase

TBP:

TATA box binding protein

XGAL:

5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside

References

  1. Atwan Z. Promyelocytic leukaemia protein isoform ii and mild heat stress compromise human adenovirus type 5 gene expression: University of Warwick; 2016.

  2. Ayers D, Clements DN, Salway F, Day PJR (2007) Expression stability of commonly used reference genes in canine articular connective tissues. BMC Vet Res 3(1):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber RD, Harmer DW, Coleman RA, Clark BJ (2005) GAPDH as a housekeeping gene: analysis of GAPDH mRNA expression in a panel of 72 human tissues. Physiol Genomics 21(3):389–395

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bustin SA (2000) Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol 25(2):169–193

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen C, Xie T, Ye S, Jensen AB, Eilenberg J (2016) Selection of reference genes for expression analysis in the entomophthoralean fungus Pandora neoaphidis. Braz J Microbiol 47(1):259–265

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Y. The role of PML-II in type I interferon response and gene transcription regulation: University of Warwick; 2014.

  7. Chen Y, Wright J, Meng X, Leppard KN. Promyelocytic leukemia protein isoform II promotes transcription factor recruitment to activate interferon β and interferon-responsive gene expression. Molecular and cellular biology. 2015:MCB. 01478-14.

  8. Cronin M, Ghosh K, SistAre F, Quackenbush J, VilKer V, O’Connell C. Universal RNA reference materials for gene expression. Clinical Chemistry; 2004.

  9. Cui X, Zhou J, Qiu J, Johnson MR, Mrug M (2009) Validation of endogenous internal real-time PCR controls in renal tissues. Am J Nephrol 30(5):413–417

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dheda K, Huggett JF, Bustin SA, Johnson MA, Rook G, Zumla A (2004) Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. Biotechniques. 37(1):112–119

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibson UE, Heid CA, Williams PM (1996) A novel method for real time quantitative RT-PCR. Genome Res 6(10):995–1001

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gorzelniak K, Janke J, Engeli S, Sharma AM (2001) Validation of endogenous controls for gene expression studies in human adipocytes and preadipocytes. Horm Metab Res 33(10):625–627

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Higuchi R, Fockler C, Dollinger G, Watson R (1993) Kinetic PCR analysis: real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. Nat Biotechnol 11(9):1026

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S, Zumla A (2005) Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun 6(4):279

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ivan Bower N, Joachim Moser R, Robert Hill J, Arabella LS (2007) Universal reference method for real-time PCR gene expression analysis of preimplantation embryos. Biotechniques 42(2):199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang L, Schlesinger F, Davis CA, Zhang Y, Li R, Salit M et al (2011) Synthetic spike-in standards for RNA-seq experiments. Genome Res 21:1543

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalejta RF, Shenk T (2002) Manipulation of the cell cycle by human cytomegalovirus. Front Biosci 7(1):295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krog GR, Clausen FB, Dziegiel MH (2007) Quantitation of RHD by real-time polymerase chain reaction for determination of RHD zygosity and RHD mosaicism/chimerism: an evaluation of four quantitative methods. Transfusion 47(4):715–722

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Livak KJ. ABI prism 7700 sequence detection system user bulletin# 2 relative quantification of gene expression. ABI company publication 1997.

  20. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods 25(4):402–408

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meller M, Vadachkoria S, Luthy DA, Williams MA (2005) Evaluation of housekeeping genes in placental comparative expression studies. Placenta. 26(8-9):601–607

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Menager P, Roux P, Megret F, Bourgeois J-P, Le Sourd A-M, Danckaert A et al (2009) Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) plays a major role in the formation of rabies virus Negri Bodies. PLoS Pathog 5(2):e1000315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pfaffl MW, Hageleit M (2001) Validities of mRNA quantification using recombinant RNA and recombinant DNA external calibration curves in real-time RT-PCR. Biotechnol Lett 23(4):275–282

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Radonić A, Thulke S, Bae H-G, Müller MA, Siegert W, Nitsche A (2005) Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in virus infected cells: SARS corona virus, yellow fever virus, human herpesvirus-6, camelpox virus and cytomegalovirus infections. Virol J 2(1):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Radonić A, Thulke S, Mackay IM, Landt O, Siegert W, Nitsche A (2004) Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 313(4):856–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schreiner S, Bürck C, Glass M, Groitl P, Wimmer P, Kinkley S et al (2013) Control of human adenovirus type 5 gene expression by cellular Daxx/ATRX chromatin-associated complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 41(6):3532–3550

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Skern R, Frost P, Nilsen F (2005) Relative transcript quantification by quantitative PCR: roughly right or precisely wrong? BMC Mol Biol 6(1):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Svingen T, Spiller CM, Kashimada K, Harley VR, Koopman P (2009) Identification of suitable normalizing genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis of gene expression in fetal mouse gonads. Sex Dev 3(4):194–204

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tanaka K-I, Namba T, Arai Y, Fujimoto M, Adachi H, Sobue G et al (2007) Genetic evidence for a protective role for heat shock factor 1 and heat shock protein 70 against colitis. J Biol Chem 282(32):23240–23252

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vestergaard AL, Knudsen UB, Munk T, Rosbach H, Martensen PM (2010) Transcriptional expression of type-I interferon response genes and stability of housekeeping genes in the human endometrium and endometriosis. Mol Hum Reprod 17(4):243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang HL, Chen J, Tian Q, Wang S, Xia X, Yin W (2014) Identification and validation of reference genes for Populus euphratica gene expression analysis during abiotic stresses by quantitative real-time PCR. Physiol Plant 152(3):529–545

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge professor Keith Leppard in helping me conduct the work in adenovirus laboratory at the School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. Thanks to Dr. Kirsten Bentley, School of Biology, St Andrews, UK, and Dr. Andrew Woodman, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, USA, for providing GFP and EV plasmids.

Funding

The fund was awarded by higher committee for education development in Iraq (HCED Iraq).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I have generated all the data by myself at adenovirus laboratory in the School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeenah Weheed Atwan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

I confirm that the work did not include any human or animal subject.

Consent for publication

I agree to submit the paper to the bulletin of the national research center; it is an original paper and does not infringe on any copyright, and also currently, it is not under any consideration by another journal and has no conflict.

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atwan, Z.W. GAPDH spike RNA as an alternative for housekeeping genes in relative gene expression assay using real-time PCR. Bull Natl Res Cent 44, 32 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-020-00284-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Spike RNA
  • qPCR
  • Relative expression
  • Housekeeping genes
  • Universal normalizer