- Open Access
Predominance of multidrug-resistant bacteria causing urinary tract infections among men with prostate enlargement attending a tertiary hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Bulletin of the National Research Centre volume 47, Article number: 54 (2023)
Patients with prostate enlargement have an increased risk of recurrent urinary tract infections. This study determined the resistance profile of bacteria causing urinary tract infection (UTI) and the magnitude of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria among patients with symptomatic prostate enlargement in a tertiary hospital in Dar es Salaam.
This cross-sectional study was conducted at Muhimbili National Hospital between August 2021 and January 2022. Male patients aged 40–90 years with symptomatic enlarged prostate, confirmed by digital rectal examination, were enrolled consecutively. We used conventional biochemical methods and analytical profile index (API) 20-E & API 20-NE to identify the uropathogens. In addition, antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method.
A total of 422 participants were enrolled, of whom 196 (46.4%) had laboratory-confirmed UTI. In total, 203 bacterial pathogens were isolated. Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were the predominant uropathogens accounting to 165/203 (81.3%). The prevalent isolates were E. coli 49 (24.1%), followed by K. pneumoniae 40 (19.7%). Most, 157 (77.3%) pathogens were MDR, of which 33 (21.0%) were resistant to all tested antibiotic classes. The proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was 75.8%, while 45.5% of S. aureus were inducible clindamycin resistant. Among Enterobacterales, 98 (70.5%) were Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) producers, and 33 (20.0%) were carbapenem resistant. Four of forty-one (9.6%) non-ESBL producers were class C β-lactamase producers.
There is a relatively high proportion of MDR strains of uropathogens, which limits treatment options for UTI among men with prostate enlargement. These findings call for the revision of the current UTI treatment guidelines and continuous antimicrobial resistance surveillance to monitor antibiotic resistance and guide treatment options within the hospital.
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the common complications of men with urine retention secondary to urinary bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) (Dougherty and Aeddula 2022). Urine in a normal urinary bladder is voided through the urethra; thus, the transient bacteria in the urethra are eliminated in the normal urine flow (Wu et al. 2017). Obstructed urinary bladder impairs urine flow, allowing bacteria to grow, leading to significant bacteriuria or UTI (Godbole et al. 2020). As the prostate gland enlarges due to physiological changes, it blocks the urinary bladder leading to urine retention, renal insufficiency, and recurrent UTI (Lee and Kuo 2017; Ng and Baradhi 2022). About 15–20% of men with BOO due to enlarged prostate present with recurrent UTI (Aaron et al. 2016; Lee and Kuo 2017).
Recurrent UTI and symptoms of prostatism lead to irrational antibiotic prescriptions for UTI and even self-treatment by patients, consequentially causing the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR) bacteria (Josephs-Spaulding et al. 2021). Further, to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) following urological surgery or procedure among these patients, pre-operative and post-operative antibiotics are usually given, but this has contributed to the increased risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) (Călina et al. 2017; Menz et al. 2021). Globally, the incidence of multidrug resistance (MDR) bacteria causing UTI was reported to be < 20% in Europe (Gomila et al. 2018) and up to 60% in low-middle-income countries (LMIC) (Gashaw et al. 2018; Khan et al. 2019) in which one of the contributing factors is the use of antibiotics inappropriately (Gomila et al. 2018).
Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are the most common cause of community-acquired and hospital-acquired UTI (Schmider et al. 2022; Seifu and Gebissa 2018). Cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and penicillin are the common antibiotic classes used for the empirical treatment of UTI in Tanzania (Ministry of Health 2021; Sangeda et al. 2021; Sonda et al. 2019). However, extensive use of cephalosporins has led to extended-spectrum-beta-lactamases (ESBL) production by Enterobacteriaceae, which correlate with resistance to other common antibiotics (Ibrahim et al. 2023).
The inability to do routine urine cultures and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) due to resource limitations has led to excessive use of apparently inappropriate antibiotics and inadequate treatment of UTI. This scenario has contributed to the failure to identify patients at risk of UTI caused by MDR, the emergence of MDR bacterial infections associated with complications such as sepsis, increased health cost, prolonged hospital stays, and increased mortality (Madrazo et al. 2021). Current treatment guidelines stipulate using amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, and nitrofurantoin as empirical antibiotics for UTI (Ministry of Health 2021). However, with the widespread antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens, the suggested regimens may be ineffective. In addition, a recent study found very high levels of MDR pathogens in patients with UTI in Tanzania (Silago et al. 2022). Therefore, we hypothesize that the prevalence of MDR would be higher among patients with prostate enlargement due to the prolonged use of antibiotics and the tendency to retain urine (Sabih and Leslie 2022).
In the absence of current data, we conducted this study to provide updated information on the status of resistant bacteria causing UTI in patients with an enlarged prostate and, in the process, provide data that can be used to revisit the management of such patients.
Study design, duration, and setting
We conducted a cross-sectional study in Dar es Salaam between August 2021 and January 2022 at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), Tanzania's largest tertiary healthcare facility. The hospital has about 1500-bed capacity; the urology unit has more than 30-bed capacity. The urology unit admits about ten patients daily and performs over 70 urological procedures monthly.
We enrolled male patients with enlarged prostate, confirmed by digital rectal examination (DRE) or radiologically, presenting with clinical features of UTI. Patients were admitted to the wards (before or after urology surgery) or attended a urology clinic (referral cases or follow-up). Admitted patients included those scheduled for surgery (prostatectomy and trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and patients referred with urosepsis. Outpatients comprised patients scheduled for a biopsy, follow-up for biopsy results, medical therapy for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), and patients with prostate cancer.
Sample size and sampling procedure
The sample size was estimated using the Kish Leslie formula (1965), considering the 30% prevalence of MDR bacteria among patients with healthcare-associated infections in Ethiopia (Gashaw et al. 2018). Therefore, the adjusted minimum sample size was 324. Male patients attending the urology clinic or admitted to the urology ward were consecutively enrolled upon fulfilling the eligibility criteria.
Urine specimen collection
Mid-stream urine (MSU) was collected from patients without urinary catheters. For patients with indwelling catheters, a clump with forceps was placed above the port for 30 min to allow urine to collect in the bladder. The port was disinfected with 70% alcohol, followed by clump release to allow urine to flow from the port to the sterile urine container. Ten millilitres of urine was collected from each participant into a labelled sterile container. Urine specimens were sent to the microbiology laboratory at MNH for processing within 2 h of collection.
Bacterial isolation and identification
Urine specimens were directly inoculated onto cysteine lactose electrolyte deficient agar (CLED) and blood agar (BA) (Oxoid Ltd, Hampshire, UK) plates. The inoculated culture plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 18–24 h. Culture plates with significant bacteria growth (≥ 105 (CFU/ml)) were read for colonial morphology and then identified by Gram stain and biochemical reactions. Identification of GNB was made by oxidase test, urease, citrate, Kligler iron agar (KIA), and Sulphur, Indole, and Motility (SIM) (Oxoid Ltd, Hampshire, UK). Analytical Profile Index (API) 20E and API 20-NE (BioMérieux, France) tests were also used to identify and differentiate members of Enterobacterales and non-Enterobacterales. Gram-positive bacteria were identified by catalase, coagulase, and DNAase tests (Remel Europe Ltd, Dartford, UK). Catalase-negative Gram-positive bacteria were identified by bile esculin (Oxoid Ltd, Hampshire, UK) and pyrrolidinyl arylamidase (PYR) test (Remel Europe Ltd, Dartford, UK).
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
We used the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method for AST with commonly prescribed antibiotics per 2022 CLSI guidelines (CLSI 2022). We included ampicillin (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), meropenem (10 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg) and ceftazidime (30 μg) for GNB. For Gram-positive bacteria, we used ciprofloxacin (5 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), clindamycin (2 μg) and cefoxitin (30 μg).
Briefly, bacterial colonies were suspended in normal saline, adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard turbidity, and then swabbed evenly on Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) (Oxoid, UK). A maximum of five antibiotic discs were placed on the inoculated MHA plates using a disc dispenser and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 16–18 h. Inhibition zones were measured and interpreted per CLSI guidelines (CLSI 2022). E. coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and S. aureus ATCC 25923 were used as control organisms. An isolate resistant to at least three antibiotic classes was considered MDR strain.
Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
MRSA was phenotypically determined during the AST procedure using a cefoxitin (30 µg) disc per CLSI guidelines (CLSI 2022). A ≤ 21 mm inhibition zone diameter around the cefoxitin disc incubated at 37 °C for 16–18 h indicated MRSA. Methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) ATCC 25923 and MRSA ATCC 43300 were used as controls.
Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance
The inducible clindamycin resistance in S. aureus was detected using the D test method per CLSI guidelines (CLSI 2022). S. aureus isolates resistant to erythromycin but susceptible to clindamycin were inoculated on MHA plates; Erythromycin (15 mg) and clindamycin (2 µg) discs were applied 15–26 mm apart on the same plate, incubated aerobically for 16–18 h at 37 °C. Flattening the zone of inhibition of clindamycin adjacent to the erythromycin disc (D-zone) was confirmed as inducible clindamycin resistance S. aureus (CLSI 2022). The S. aureus ATCC BAA-977 D test positive and S. aureus ATCC BAA-976 D test negative were used as the controls.
Detection of extended spectrum β-lactamase production
Ceftazidime discs (30 μg) and ceftriaxone (30 μg) were used to screen for ESBL production among Enterobacterales during AST. Isolates with inhibition zones of ≤ 22 mm for ceftazidime and ≤ 25 mm for ceftriaxone were subjected to a confirmatory test. ESBL production was confirmed using the disc combination method (CLSI 2022). Isolates showing an increased zone of inhibition of ≥ 5 mm between ceftazidime or cefotaxime disc with clavulanic acid and without clavulanic acid were considered ESBL producers (CLSI 2022).
For non-ESBL producers, class C β-lactamase producers were tested for cefoxitin resistance and an increased zone of inhibition when cefepime was added to the combination disc method and was phenotypically confirmed as class C β-lactamase. We used standard reference strains of non-ESBL-producing E. coli ATCC 25922 and ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 for quality control.
Detection of carbapenemase production
Carbapenemase production was tested using modified carbapenem inactivation methods (mCIM) per CLSI guidelines (CLSI 2022). Briefly, a 1μ loopful of Enterobacterales and 10μ loopful of P. aeruginosa were emulsified in 2 millilitres of tryptic soy broth (TSB) and vortexed for 15 s. Then meropenem (10 μg) disc was added to the suspension and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. Immediately following the TSB-meropenem disc suspension incubation, a 0.5 McFarland suspension of meropenem susceptible E. coli ATCC 25922 in normal saline was made and inoculated on MHA plate. The meropenem discs from each TSB-meropenem disc suspension were removed using a sterile loop and implanted on the MHA plate inoculated with meropenem susceptible E. coli ATCC 25922, incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. The inhibition zones were measured and interpreted using CLSI guidelines (CLSI 2022). The inhibition zone of 6–15 mm diameter or small colonies within 16–18 mm diameter were confirmed as carbapenemase positive, and zone of inhibition ≥ 19 mm diameter were considered as carbapenemase negative. K. pneumoniae ATCC-1705 and K. pneumoniae ATCC-1706 were used as a positive and negative control for carbapenemase-producing bacteria, respectively.
We performed statistical analysis using the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 27 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Frequencies and percentages were used for categorical variables, and mean (standard deviation (SD)) were used for continuous variables.
Description of study participants
A total of 422 participants were enrolled in the study, aged between 40 and 90 years and a mean age of 68 ± 11 years. The majority, 233 (55.2%), were enrolled from outpatients. Most participants, 291 (70%) had BPH. Regarding genitourinary symptoms, 241/422 (57.1%) complained of incomplete bladder emptying, 263/422 (62.3%) had increased frequency, 201/422 (47.3%) reported urgency, and 227/422 (53.8%) complained of hesitancy. The laboratory-confirmed UTI was found in 196/422, 46.5% (95% CI 41.56–51.53%).
Spectrum of bacteria causing UTI
A total of 203 bacterial isolates were obtained from 196 urine cultures. Seven urine specimens yielded two types of clinical isolates. GNB were the predominant pathogens accounting for 165/203 (81.3%). E. coli, 24.1% (n = 49); K. pneumoniae, 19.7% (n = 40); S. aureus, 16.3% (n = 33) and P. aeruginosa, 7.9% (n = 16) were the frequently isolated pathogens. In addition, Chromobacterium violaceum, a rare pathogenic bacterium accounted for one isolate (Fig. 1). The flow chart of isolates identification results is provided as an Additional file 1.
Antimicrobial resistance pattern
Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) demonstrated an overall resistance rate of 96% towards ampicillin, 80% towards ceftriaxone and ceftazidime, and 77% towards amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Among Gram-positive bacteria, a high resistance rate was demonstrated towards erythromycin (84%), followed by penicillin (71%). Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria showed a high resistance rate against gentamicin (78%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (72%), ciprofloxacin (71%), and nitrofurantoin (50%). GNB had a low resistance rate towards amikacin (35%) and meropenem (33%), while Gram-positive bacteria showed a low resistance rate to clindamycin (28%) (Table 1).
In total, 157 (77.3%) uropathogens were MDR. Thirty-three (21.0%) MDR strains were resistant to seven classes of antibiotics tested. The antibiotic classes included: penicillin, aminoglycosides, carbapenems, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, nitrofuran and sulphonamides for Gram-negative bacteria, and penicillin, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, lincosamide, macrolides, nitrofuran and sulphonamides for Gram-positive bacteria. All Enterobacter cloacae were MDR, followed by E. coli, 45/49 (91.8%,) and K. pneumoniae, 31/40 (77.5%) (Table 2). Most S. aureus, 25/33 (75.8%), were MRSA and 45.5% of S. aureus strains were inducible clindamycin resistant. The proportion of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales was 70.5% (98/139), whereby E. cloacae (73.3%) and E. coli (71.4%) were the most prevalent ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (Table 2). For non-ESBL producers, 4/41 (9.6%) bacterial isolates tested positive for class C β-lactamase. Fifty-four (32.9%) isolates were meropenem-resistant GNB, of which 20.0% (33/165) were carbapenemase producers (Table 2).
Antimicrobial resistance rate for ESBL and non-ESBL-producing Enterobacterales
ESBL producers demonstrated a higher resistance rate towards amikacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, gentamicin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole than non-ESBL producers (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in resistance rate between ESBL-producing and non-ESBL-producing bacteria towards ciprofloxacin, meropenem, and nitrofurantoin (Table 3).
To our knowledge, this is the first study in Tanzania and Sub-Saharan Africa to report the magnitude of MDR bacteria causing UTI among patients with prostate enlargement. The current study found that nearly half of the patients with enlarged prostates had laboratory-confirmed UTI. More than 80% of pathogens causing UTI were GNB; E. coli and K. pneumoniae 89 (54%) account for more than half of GNB. The pathogens demonstrated high resistance rates of > 70% to common antibiotics like ampicillin, erythromycin, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, gentamicin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, and penicillin. In addition, more than three-quarters of the pathogens were MDR strains implying significant challenges in treating UTI in this population.
The proportion of UTI observed in the current study among men with prostate enlargement is comparable with the study in Nigeria (44.7%) and a bit lower than a study in India (62.8%) among a similar population (Agbugui et al. 2016; Mishra et al. 2016). Nonetheless, our study found a high proportion of MDR strains, including 70.5% ESBL-PE, 20% carbapenemase-producing GNB, and 76% MRSA. Furthermore, studies have shown that infections with MDR are significantly severe and associated with treatment failure leading to increased hospital stay and mortality (Lee et al. 2016; Madrazo et al. 2021; Mitchell et al. 2016; Perez and van Duin 2013).
The current study revealed E. coli and K. pneumoniae as the most frequent GNB pathogens causing UTI among men with prostate enlargement, with more than three-quarters being MDR strains. Several studies have reported similar findings where E. coli was the predominant cause of UTIs (Agbugui et al. 2016; Asafo-Adjei et al. 2018; Mishra et al. 2016). In addition, the current study recovered non-fermentative GNBs such as P. aeruginosa, A. baumanii, and B. cepacia, which have been highly associated with hospital-acquired infections (Ángeles-Garay et al. 2017; Hrbacek et al. 2021; Jiménez-Guerra et al. 2018). Furthermore, S. aureus was the prevalent Gram-positive bacteria causing UTI, similar to reports in other studies (Agbugui et al. 2016; Mishra et al. 2016; Odoki et al. 2019).
Our study demonstrated a high overall resistance rate towards amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, and nitrofurantoin, the recommended antibiotics for UTI in our setting. The findings are consistent with reports in Ethiopia and Ghana (Asafo-Adjei et al. 2018; Seifu and Gebissa 2018). On the contrary, a study at Bugando hospital, Northwest Tanzania, reported a lower resistance rate towards ciprofloxacin (31–51%) and nitrofurantoin (35–42%) (Ndomba et al. 2022). The varying resistance rate could be due to differences in hospital antibiotic policy, prescribing practices across the hospitals, and the characteristics of patients. In addition, the easy availability of these antibiotics over the counter and affordability for managing UTI in Tanzania may explain the high resistance rate (Raphael et al. 2021). Amikacin and meropenem had a low resistance rate against GNB, which were predominant pathogens; hence could be used as empirical therapy while awaiting AST results. However, great caution should be taken with amikacin due to its adverse effects, especially among the elderly, who may suffer nephrotoxic complications (Ipekci et al. 2014).
The proportion of MDR strains among patients with prostate enlargement was remarkably higher than reports from other studies conducted among men with BPH, hospitalized patients, and old patients with community-acquired UTI (Gashaw et al. 2018; Madrazo et al. 2021b; Mishra et al. 2016). The current findings are also higher than reports from studies in Tanzania on UTI in the population of women, children, people with an indwelling urinary catheter, and people living with HIV (PLWHIV) (Ndomba et al. 2022; Ngowi et al. 2021; Raphael et al. 2021; Schmider et al. 2022). Several factors may contribute to this study's high rate of MDR strains, as reported in other studies (Kalluru et al. 2018; Nicolle 2005). Advanced age among this studied population is one of the risk factors for acquiring infections caused by MDR pathogens (Guclu et al. 2021). Additionally, studies have shown that most patients with prostate enlargement require catheterization to relieve urine retention, which predisposes them to infection with MDR strains (Kalluru et al. 2018). Further, these patients have a high hospital attendance rate, thus predisposing them to colonization or infections with MDR strains (Perez and van Duin 2013; Safdar and Maki 2002). Repeated use of antibiotics to treat recurrent UTI may be one of the attributes for the emergence of MDR strains due to selection pressure (Holmes et al. 2016; Serlin et al. 2018). A high proportion of MDR strains among uropathogens in the studied population calls for implementing an antimicrobial stewardship program and AMR surveillance in urology. Unfortunately, there are limited choices for oral antibiotic therapies against MDR strains causing UTI. Therefore, there is a need to implement routine culture and AST to direct the choice of antibiotic. However, fosfomycin, not tested in this study, has been reported to be effective in treating UTIs caused by MDR GNB (Giancola et al. 2017; Pullukcu et al. 2007).
In the current study, we observed around three-quarters of S. aureus being MRSA, higher than reported studies conducted in Ethiopia (43.4%), Nigeria (13.1%), Iran (55.6%), and India (43%) in the adult population (Mitiku et al. 2021; Mofolorunsho et al. 2015; Yousefi et al. 2017). Our study's high proportion of MRSA infection may be attributed to several factors, as reported in other studies, including improper antibiotic use (McHugh and Riley 2004; Porto et al. 2013), surgical interventions and catheterization (Loftus et al. 2018) and recent hospitalization (Drapeau et al. 2007). Clindamycin has been preferred to treat infections by MRSA (Goudarzi et al. 2020), but the development of inducible clindamycin resistance may curb the efficacy of this antibiotic (Coello et al. 1997; Siberry et al. 2003). In this study, the proportion of inducible clindamycin resistance among S. aureus strains was 45.5%. Several studies have reported similar findings whereby the proportion of inducible clindamycin resistance ranged from 2.9% to 44.0% in Africa (Assefa 2022). The proportion of inducible clindamycin resistance was reported to be 10% in Egypt (Abdelmawgoud et al. 2021), 35.8% in Libya (Zorgani et al. 2009), and 33.3% in Uganda (Mwambi et al. 2014). On the contrary, a low prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance was reported in Iran (7.5% to 21.7%) (Goudarzi et al. 2020).
The present study observed that most Enterobacterales (70.5%) were ESBL-PE, accounting for the high resistance observed towards third-generation cephalosporins. The findings were comparable with another study in the same hospital, which showed a high prevalence of ESBL-PE (Moyo et al. 2010). Another study in Mwanza, Tanzania, reported a prevalence of 50.6% for ESBL-PE, slightly lower than this study (Ndomba et al. 2022). ESBL is carried in the plasmid, which carries other resistance genes that can be easily transferred among the Enterobacterales. The transfer of ESBL genes through plasmid may justify significant resistance towards other antibiotics, including ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (Schwaber et al. 2005). Further, cefepime was used to detect the presence of AmpC since it is less affected by AmpC β-lactamases (Sasirekha and Shivakumar 2012). Four bacteria strains (E. cloacae, K. pneumoniae, P. stuartii and E. coli) had class C β-lactamase enzymes. AmpC β-lactamases can be chromosomal or plasmid-encoded and can be induced in frequent exposure to β-lactam antibiotics (Jacoby 2009; Mohamudha et al. 2010; Philippon et al. 2002; Rodríguez-Baño et al. 2012).
Our study found a comparatively higher rate of carbapenem resistance than the study in Mwanza, Tanzania (Ndomba et al. 2022) but lower than the findings in Ethiopia (Gashaw et al. 2018). The carbapenem class of antibiotics is usually prescribed for treating UTIs caused by MDR bacteria, including ESBL-producing and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (Cerceo et al. 2016; Rodríguez-Baño et al. 2018). One of the main mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in GNB is carbapenemase enzyme production which hydrolyses these antibiotics (Hasan et al. 2021). Our study found that the proportion of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) among GNB was higher than in Asia and Europe (Braun et al. 2018; Zhao et al. 2021). A high proportion of carbapenem resistance in the current study was observed among P. aeruginosa (50%), followed by P. mirabilis (33.3%) and E. cloacae (26.7%). Another study also showed similar findings with a high rate of carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa (78.4%), K. pneumoniae (31.6%), E. cloacae (25.2%), and E. coli (24.3%) (Zhao et al. 2021). The observed variations in carbapenem resistance rate could be due to differences in geographic location, study population, and infection prevention and control measures across countries (Braun et al. 2018; Zhao et al. 2021). In preceding studies, catheterization, antibiotic use, and hospital admission have been reported as the risk factor for infection with CPO (Kim et al. 2020).
We should have followed up on patients to determine their outcomes, which was one of our study's limitations. This study recommends whole genome sequencing to unveil novel virulence and AMR genes.
We observed a high proportion of MDR strains of uropathogenic bacteria in symptomatic patients with prostate enlargement. Furthermore, these strains were resistant to more than four antibiotic classes, which are routinely prescribed, thus limiting the available options for UTI treatments. These results support the need for routine culture and AST in place of empirical therapy. In keeping with the findings from this study, we recommend revising UTI treatment guidelines and substituting ineffective antibiotics with effective ones.
Availability of data and materials
All graphs and tables generated in this study are included in this manuscript.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Benign prostate hyperplasia
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases producing Enterobacterales
Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria
Muhimbili National Hospital
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
Urinary tract infection
Aaron L, Franco OE, Hayward SW (2016) Review of prostate anatomy and embryology and the etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin N Am 43(3):279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2016.04.012
Abdelmawgoud YE, Abd El-Latif W, Fawzy NK, Elnagdy SM (2021) Prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance and nanotechnological control of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. Egypt J Bot. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejbo.2021.47561.1576
Agbugui J, Obarisiagbon E, Osaigbovo I (2016) Bacteriology of urine specimens obtained from men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Niger J Surg 22(2):65. https://doi.org/10.4103/1117-6806.177415
Ángeles-Garay U, Zacate-Palacios Y, López-Herrera JR, Hernández-Sánchez EA, Silva Sánchez J, Ascencio-Montiel I (2017) Hospital outbreak of urinary tract infections by lubricant gel contaminated with Burkholderia cepacia. Revista Medica Del Instituto Mexicano Del Seguro Social 50(6):615–622
Asafo-Adjei K, Mensah J, Labi A, Dayie N, Donkor E (2018) Urinary tract infections among bladder outlet obstruction patients in Accra, Ghana: aetiology, antibiotic resistance, and risk factors. Diseases 6(3):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases6030065
Assefa M (2022) Inducible clindamycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in Africa: a systematic review. Int J Microbiol 2022:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1835603
Braun SD, Jamil B, Syed MA, Abbasi SA, Weiß D, Slickers P, Monecke S, Engelmann I, Ehricht R (2018) Prevalence of carbapenemase-producing organisms at the Kidney Center of Rawalpindi (Pakistan) and evaluation of an advanced molecular microarray-based carbapenemase assay. Future Microbiol 13(11):1225–1246. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2018-0082
Călina D, Docea AO, Rosu L, Zlatian O, Rosu AF, Anghelina F, Rogoveanu O, Arsene AL, Nicolae AC, Drăgoi CM, Tsiaoussis J, Tsatsakis AM, Spandidos DA, Drakoulis N, Gofita E (2017) Antimicrobial resistance development following surgical site infections. Mol Med Rep 15(2):681–688. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.6034
Cerceo E, Deitelzweig SB, Sherman BM, Amin AN (2016) Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections in the hospital setting: overview, implications for clinical practice, and emerging treatment options. Microb Drug Resist 22(5):412–431. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2015.0220
CLSI (2022) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 32nd ed
Coello R, Glynn JR, Gaspar C, Picazo JJ, Fereres J (1997) Risk factors for developing clinical infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) amongst hospital patients initially only colonized with MRSA. J Hosp Infect 37(1):39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(97)90071-2
Dougherty JM, Aeddula NR (2022) Male urinary retention. In: StatPearls Publishing
Drapeau CM, Angeletti C, Festa A, Petrosillo N (2007) Role of previous hospitalization in clinically-significant MRSA infection among HIV-infected inpatients: results of a case–control study. BMC Infect Dis 7(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-7-36
Gashaw M, Berhane M, Bekele S, Kibru G, Teshager L, Yilma Y, Ahmed Y, Fentahun N, Assefa H, Wieser A, Gudina EK, Ali S (2018) Emergence of high drug resistant bacterial isolates from patients with health care associated infections at Jimma University Medical Center: a cross sectional study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 7(1):138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0431-0
Giancola SE, Mahoney M, Hogan MD, Raux BR, McCoy C, Hirsch EB (2017) Assessment of fosfomycin for complicated or multidrug-resistant urinary tract infections: patient characteristics and outcomes. Chemotherapy 62(2):100–104. https://doi.org/10.1159/000449422
Godbole GP, Cerruto N, Chavada R (2020) Principles of assessment and management of urinary tract infections in older adults. J Pharm Pract Res 50(3):276–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/jppr.1650
Gomila A, Shaw E, Carratalà J, Leibovici L, Tebé C, Wiegand I, Vallejo-Torres L, Vigo JM, Morris S, Stoddart M, Grier S, Vank C, Cuperus N, Van den Heuvel L, Eliakim-Raz N, Vuong C, MacGowan A, Addy I, Pujol M (2018) Predictive factors for multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria among hospitalised patients with complicated urinary tract infections. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 7(1):111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0401-6
Goudarzi M, Kobayashi N, Dadashi M, Pantůček R, Nasiri MJ, Fazeli M, Pouriran R, Goudarzi H, Miri M, Amirpour A, Seyedjavadi SS (2020) Prevalence, genetic diversity, and temporary shifts of inducible clindamycin resistance Staphylococcus aureus clones in Tehran, Iran: a molecular-epidemiological analysis from 2013 to 2018. Front Microbiol 11:66. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00663
Guclu E, Halis F, Kose E, Ogutlu A, Karabay O (2021) Risk factors of multidrug-resistant bacteria in community-acquired urinary tract infections. Afr Health Sci 21(1):214–219. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i1.28
Hasan CM, Dutta D, Nguyen ANT (2021) Revisiting antibiotic resistance: mechanistic foundations to evolutionary outlook. Antibiotics 11(1):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010040
Holmes AH, Moore LSP, Sundsfjord A, Steinbakk M, Regmi S, Karkey A, Guerin PJ, Piddock LJ (2016) Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance. The Lancet 387(10014):176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00473-0
Hrbacek J, Cermak P, Zachoval R (2021) Current antibiotic resistance patterns of rare uropathogens: survey from Central European Urology Department 2011–2019. BMC Urol 21(1):61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00821-8
Ibrahim DR, Dodd CER, Stekel DJ, Meshioye RT, Diggle M, Lister M, Hobman JL (2023) Multidrug-resistant ESBL-producing E. coli in clinical samples from the UK. Antibiotics 12(1):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010169
Ipekci T, Seyman D, Berk H, Celik O (2014) Clinical and bacteriological efficacy of amikacin in the treatment of lower urinary tract infection caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Infect Chemother 20(12):762–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2014.08.007
Jacoby GA (2009) AmpC β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 22(1):161–182. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00036-08
Jiménez-Guerra G, Heras-Cañas V, Gutiérrez-Soto M, del Pilar A-P, Expósito-Ruiz M, Navarro-Marí JM, Gutiérrez-Fernández J (2018) Urinary tract infection by Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evolution of antimicrobial resistance and therapeutic alternatives. J Med Microbiol 67(6):790–797. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000742
Josephs-Spaulding J, Krogh TJ, Rettig HC, Lyng M, Chkonia M, Waschina S, Graspeuntner S, Rupp J, Møller-Jensen J, Kaleta C (2021) Recurrent urinary tract infections: unraveling the complicated environment of uncomplicated UTIs. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.562525
Kalluru S, Eggers S, Barker A, Shirley D, Sethi AK, Sengupta S, Yeptho K, Safdar N (2018) Risk factors for infection with multidrug-resistant organisms in Haryana, India. Am J Infect Control 46(3):341–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.08.021
Khan MS, Durrance-Bagale A, Legido-Quigley H, Mateus A, Hasan R, Spencer J, Hanefeld J (2019) ‘LMICs as reservoirs of AMR’: a comparative analysis of policy discourse on antimicrobial resistance with reference to Pakistan. Health Policy Plan 34(3):178–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz022
Kim YA, Lee SJ, Park YS, Lee YJ, Yeon JH, Seo YH, Lee K (2020) Risk factors for carbapenemase-producing enterobacterales infection or colonization in a Korean Intensive Care Unit: a case–control study. Antibiotics 9(10):680. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9100680
Lee C-L, Kuo H-C (2017) Pathophysiology of benign prostate enlargement and lower urinary tract symptoms: Current concepts. Tzu Chi Med J 29(2):79. https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_20_17
Lee Y-C, Hsiao C-Y, Hung M-C, Hung S-C, Wang H-P, Huang Y-J, Wang J-T (2016) Bacteremic urinary tract infection caused by multidrug-resistant enterobacteriaceae are associated with severe sepsis at admission: implication for empirical therapy. Medicine 95(20):e3694. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003694
Loftus RW, Dexter F, Robinson ADM (2018) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus has greater risk of transmission in the operating room than methicillin-sensitive S. aureus. Am J Infect Control 46(5):520–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.11.002
Madrazo M, Esparcia A, López-Cruz I, Alberola J, Piles L, Viana A, Eiros JM, Artero A (2021) Clinical impact of multidrug-resistant bacteria in older hospitalized patients with community-acquired urinary tract infection. BMC Infect Dis 21(1):1232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06939-2
McHugh CG, Riley LW (2004) Risk factors and costs associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 25(5):425–430. https://doi.org/10.1086/502417
Menz BD, Charani E, Gordon DL, Leather AJ, Moonesinghe SR, Phillips CJ (2021) Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in an era of antibiotic resistance: common resistant bacteria and wider considerations for practice. Infect Drug Resist 14:5235–5252. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S319780
Ministry Of Health Community Development Gender Elderly And Children (2021) Standard Treatment Guidelines & National Essential Medicines List Tanzania Mainland, 6th ed. Tanzania
Mishra P, Prakash V, Singh K, Mog H, Agarwal S (2016) Bacteriological profile of isolates from urine samples in patients of benign prostatic hyperplasia and or prostatitis showing lower urinary tract symptoms. J Clin Diagn Res. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/21973.8734
Mitchell BG, Ferguson JK, Anderson M, Sear J, Barnett A (2016) Length of stay and mortality associated with healthcare-associated urinary tract infections: a multi-state model. J Hosp Infect 93(1):92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2016.01.012
Mitiku A, Aklilu A, Biresaw G, Gize A (2021) Prevalence and associated factors of methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among urinary tract infection suspected patients attending at Arba Minch General Hospital, Southern Ethiopia. Infect Drug Resist 14:2133–2142. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S306648
Mofolorunsho CK, Ocheni M, Omatola CA, Agieni AG (2015) Staphylococcus aureus: Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile in Anyigba, North-Central Nigeria. Am J Infect Dis 11(4):93–97. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajidsp.2015.93.97
Mohamudha PR, Harish BN, Parija SC (2010) AmpC beta lactamases among Gram negative clinical isolates from a tertiary hospital, South India. Braz J Microbiol 41(3):596–602. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822010000300009
Moyo SJ, Aboud S, Kasubi M, Lyamuya EF, Maselle SY (2010) Antimicrobial resistance among producers and non-producers of extended spectrum beta-lactamases in urinary isolates at a tertiary Hospital in Tanzania. BMC Res Notes 3(1):348. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-348
Mwambi B, Iramiot J, Bwanga F, Nakaye M, Itabangi H, Bazira J (2014) Clindamycin resistance among Staphylococcus Aureus isolated at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, in South Western Uganda. Brit Microbiol Res J 4(12):1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.9734/BMRJ/2014/10572
Ndomba ALM, Laisser RM, Silago V, Kidenya BR, Mwanga J, Seni J, Mshana SE (2022) Urinary tract infections and associated factors among patients with indwelling urinary catheters attending Bugando Medical Centre a tertiary hospital in Northwestern Tanzania. Microorganisms 10(2):473. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020473
Ng M, Baradhi KM (2022) Benign prostatic hyperplasia. In: StatPearls Publishing
Ngowi BN, Sunguya B, Herman A, Chacha A, Maro E, Rugarabamu LF, Bartlett J, Balandya E, Mteta KA, Mmbaga BT (2021) Prevalence of multidrug resistant UTI among people living with HIV in Northern Tanzania. Infect Drug Resist 14:1623–1633. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S299776
Nicolle L (2005) Complicated urinary tract infection in adults. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 16(6):349–360. https://doi.org/10.1155/2005/385768
Odoki M, Almustapha Aliero A, Tibyangye J, Nyabayo Maniga J, Wampande E, Drago Kato C, Agwu E, Bazira J (2019) Prevalence of bacterial urinary tract infections and associated factors among patients attending hospitals in Bushenyi District, Uganda. Int J Microbiol 2019:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4246780
Perez F, van Duin D (2013) Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a menace to our most vulnerable patients. Clevel Clin J Med 80(4):225–233. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.80a.12182
Philippon A, Arlet G, Jacoby GA (2002) Plasmid-determined AmpC-type β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.46.1.1-11.2002
Porto JP, Santos RO, Gontijo Filho PP, Ribas RM (2013) Active surveillance to determine the impact of methicillin resistance on mortality in patients with bacteremia and influences of the use of antibiotics on the development of MRSA infection.Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 46(6):713–718. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0199-2013
Pullukcu H, Tasbakan M, Sipahi OR, Yamazhan T, Aydemir S, Ulusoy S (2007) Fosfomycin in the treatment of extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli-related lower urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 29(1):62–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.08.039
Raphael ZS, Franco P, Mtweve D (2021) Prevalence of urinary tract infections and antibiogram of uropathogens isolated from children under five attending Bagamoyo District Hospital in Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. F1000Research 10:449. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52652.1
Rodríguez-Baño J, Miró E, Villar M, Coelho A, Gozalo M, Borrell N, Bou G, Conejo MC, Pomar V, Aracil B, Larrosa N, Agüero J, Oliver A, Fernández A, Oteo J, Pascual A, Navarro F (2012) Colonisation and infection due to Enterobacteriaceae producing plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases. J Infect 64(2):176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2011.11.016
Rodríguez-Baño J, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, Machuca I, Pascual A (2018) Treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-, AmpC-, and carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Rev 31(2):66. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00079-17
Sabih A, Leslie SW (2022) Complicated urinary tract infections. In: StatPearls Publishing
Safdar N, Maki DG (2002) The commonality of risk factors for nosocomial colonization and infection with antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus, gram-negative Bacilli, Clostridium difficile, and Candida. Ann Intern Med 136(11):834. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00013
Sangeda RZ, Saburi HA, Masatu FC, Aiko BG, Mboya EA, Mkumbwa S, Bitegeko A, Mwalwisi YH, Nkiligi EA, Chambuso M, Sillo HB, Fimbo AM, Horumpende PG (2021) National antibiotics utilization trends for human use in Tanzania from 2010 to 2016 inferred from Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority Importation Data. Antibiotics 10(10):1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101249
Sasirekha B, Shivakumar S (2012) Occurrence of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangalore. Indian J Microbiol 52(2):174–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-011-0214-2
Schmider J, Bühler N, Mkwatta H, Lechleiter A, Mlaganile T, Utzinger J, Mzee T, Kazimoto T, Becker SL (2022) Microbiological characterisation of community-acquired urinary tract infections in Bagamoyo, Tanzania: a prospective study. Trop Med Infect Dis 7(6):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7060100
Schwaber MJ, Navon-Venezia S, Schwartz D, Carmeli Y (2005) High levels of antimicrobial coresistance among extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49(5):2137–2139. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.5.2137-2139.2005
Seifu WD, Gebissa AD (2018) Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of uropathogens from cases of urinary tract infections (UTI) in Shashemene referral hospital. Ethiopia BMC Infect Dis 18(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2911-x
Serlin DC, Heidelbaugh JJ, Stoffel JT (2018) Urinary retention in adults: evaluation and initial management. Am Fam Phys 98(8):496–503
Siberry GK, Tekle T, Carroll K, Dick J (2003) Failure of clindamycin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance in vitro. Clin Infect Dis 37(9):1257–1260. https://doi.org/10.1086/377501
Silago V, Moremi N, Mtebe M, Komba E, Masoud S, Mgaya FX, Mirambo MM, Nyawale HA, Mshana SE, Matee MI (2022) Multidrug-resistant uropathogens causing community acquired urinary tract infections among patients attending health facilities in Mwanza and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Antibiotics 11(12):1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121718
Sonda TB, Horumpende PG, Kumburu HH, van Zwetselaar M, Mshana SE, Alifrangis M, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Chilongola JO, Mmbaga BT, Kibiki GS (2019) Ceftriaxone use in a tertiary care hospital in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: a need for a hospital antibiotic stewardship programme. PLoS ONE 14(8):e0220261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220261
Wu J, Miao Y, Abraham SN (2017) The multiple antibacterial activities of the bladder epithelium. Ann Transl Med 5:35–35. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.12.71
Yousefi M, Fallah F, Arshadi M, Pourmand MR, Hashemi A, Pourmand G (2017) Identification of tigecycline- and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains among patients with urinary tract infection in Iran. New Microb New Infect 19:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2017.05.009
Zhao S, Kennedy S, Perry MR, Wilson J, Chase-Topping M, Anderson E, Woolhouse MEJ, Lockhart M (2021) Epidemiology of and risk factors for mortality due to carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) in healthcare facilities. J Hosp Infect 110:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.01.028
Zorgani A, Shawerf O, Tawil K, El-Turki E, Ghenghesh K (2009) Inducible clindamycin resistance among Staphylococci isolated from burn patients. Libyan J Med 4(3):149–152. https://doi.org/10.4176/090128
The authors would like to extend their gratitude to all study participants, MNH administration, the department of urology at MNH, and all members of the Department of Microbiology & Immunology at MUHAS.
The study received financial support from Good Samaritan Foundation in collaboration with the department of Microbiology-Radboud University, Netherlands. However, the funder had no contribution in selecting the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and manuscript writing.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study attained ethical clearance from the Senate Research and Publications Committee of the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) with reference number MUHAS-REC-06-2021-697. As a result, the MNH administration granted permission to conduct the study. In addition, participants were requested to sign informed consent before enrolment in the study.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Additional file 1. Fig. S2A
: A flowchart showing bacterial isolation and identification for Gram-negative bacteria isolated from urine specimens. Fig. S2B: A flowchart showing bacterial isolation and identification for Gram-positive bacteria isolated from urine specimens.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Niccodem, E.M., Mwingwa, A., Shangali, A. et al. Predominance of multidrug-resistant bacteria causing urinary tract infections among men with prostate enlargement attending a tertiary hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Bull Natl Res Cent 47, 54 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-023-01030-z
- Multidrug resistance
- Urinary tract infection
- Extended-spectrum β-lactamase
- Carbapenemase-producing organism
- Prostate enlargement