Skip to main content

Efficiency of common filters for water treatment in Tanzania



Approximately 69% of population in Tanzania lacks better sanitation, while 45.6% lacks access to clean and safe water. To leverage this shortage, several technologies have been used for purifying water from various sources; however, there is still persistence of waterborne diseases.

Main body

This article reviewed the efficiency of common water filters in removing water contaminants such as Escherichia coli, fluoride, TSS, turbidity, nitrate, virus, BOD, COD, fecal coliform and color. Common water filters available in Tanzania markets include slow sand filter, ceramic filter, bone char, membrane purifier and bio sand filter. The effectiveness of each technology was evaluated in terms of its ability to remove water contaminants. Ceramic filter was found to be less expensive technology compared to the rest. Ineffectiveness of common water filters can be linked to persistence of waterborne diseases in Tanzania.


Ability of water filters in viral removal is of greater concern. This study suggests a ceramic filter as the best filter among all common filters available in Tanzania. Ceramic filters can be synthesized by locally available materials such as clay, saw dust, rice husk ashes and flour which make it efficient in removing all water contaminants, especially viruses.


Water is very important to all organisms where it acts as the main solvent to many substances and essential for the existence and development of life. According to World Health Organization (2017), inadequate sanitation is a major source of sickness in the world. UN (2017) affirmed that about 90% of diarrheal deaths are due to contaminated water, poor sanitation and poor hygiene. A report from joint monitoring program for water supply and sanitation by WHO and UN (2017) revealed that 4.5 billion people lack access to good sanitation. This shows that people are susceptible to waterborne diseases (Sullivan et al. 2017; Kilungo et al. 2018; Mukaratirwa-Muchayenyereyi et al. 2020). Additionally, the UN report released in 2019 indicated that 2.1 billion people throughout the world still lack access to clean drinking water. As a result, 2.2 million people die each year from waterborne diseases of whom majority of them are children under the age of five years (UN 2019). Aside from the human cost, the World Bank estimated that lack of access to safe water and good sanitation costs the global economy about $ 260 billion per annum (WHO 2017). Therefore, water has been a great issue to be considered all over the world and the various strategies should be envisaged to ensure equitable access to clean and safe water (Ajibade et al. 2014; Ugya et al. 2018).

Most of the developing countries lacks municipal water treatment systems to facilitate provision of adequate clean and safe water. Streams, ponds and rivers are their main source of drinking water which are susceptible to contamination by pathogens and chemicals. About 80% of wastewater is discharged into the environment without being treated or repurposed (UNESCO 2017). The problem of inadequate access to safe and clean water in developing countries is a major concern. According to the 2019 UN World Water Development Report, safe water and good sanitation are critical for eradicating poverty and building peaceful communities. In underdeveloped nations, the prevalence of gastrointestinal sickness is a typical sign of poor water quality and one of the primary causes of morbidity (UN 2017). Households have been using various point-of-use water treatment systems to obtain safe and clean drinking water (Mohamed et al. 2016). Despite the existence of such water treatment technologies, there is still persistence of waterborne diseases to those who cannot afford them. Tanzania in particular, faces challenges toward accessing safe and clean water due to pollution of surface and groundwater. Therefore, most of people in Tanzania are vulnerable to waterborne infections (TDHS 2010; Kiagho et al. 2016; Ainea et al. 2019).

Efficient purification systems can be used to suppress waterborne diseases. To date, there are several water filtration technologies available in the market. Water filters are essential in removing contaminants such as sediments, unwanted taste and odor, hardness and bacterial impurities from water for industrial and domestic use. Point of use (POU) water filtration systems are potential options for providing clean drinking water to the rural communities (Murphy et al. 2010a, b; Farrow et al. 2014; Mellor et al. 2014; Berg 2015). Ceramic water filters, membrane purifiers, bone char, slow sand filters, and bio sand filters are most common water filters found in Tanzania markets (Murphy et al. 2010c; Kiagho et al. 2016). The current review assesses the efficiencies of common water filters available in Tanzania. The performance of water filters in filtering water from various sources such as rivers, streams and ponds is presented. This study provides a general understanding on the water treatment technologies available in Tanzania markets to researchers, communities especially rural dwellers, policymakers, and market sellers. This will essentially strengthen the efforts to combat the existing problem of inadequate access to safe and clean water to reduce the persistence of waterborne diseases.

Main text

General water supply in Tanzania

Provision of clean and safe water is the basic human right. Several efforts have been envisaged to enhance water treatment at point of use to ensure the availability of clean and safe drinking water (Bartram et al. 2005; Mohamed et al. 2016). It has been reported that about 69% of population in Tanzania lacks better sanitation. People use water originated from rivers, streams and ponds as their main sources of drinking water. These sources are susceptible to contamination by pathogens and chemicals. In 1990, 45% of rural dwellers in Tanzania had access to safe and clean water. In 2015 the access to safe and clean water was reported to be 46% (TDHS 2010; Kilungo et al. 2018). 54.4% of the rural population had access to clean water (Kilungo et al. 2018). Health and demographic survey showed that about 17% of deaths are associated with diarrhea. Further reports revealed that 22% of urban residents and 9% of rural residents had access to better sanitation (Kilungo et al. 2018). This demonstrates that strategies to improve the quality of water are of a great demand. According to an economic analysis of the municipal water system, the cost of delivering centralized water for 10 years is roughly $221 per family. For the same period, the adoption of water treatment technology such as a ceramic filter costs around $63 (Ren et al. 2013). This suggests that using water technologies is more cost-effective and affordable than using municipal water treatment systems.

Problems associated with water systems available in Tanzania

Water systems can help people obtain clean water. However, several challenges associated with water systems force people to use untreated water that affect health of individuals (Klug et al. 2018). For example, high levels of iron in water are caused by corrosion of older hand pumps (Furey 2014). It has been reported that water systems that have been used for more than five years do not function effectively. Maintaining functional and sustainable water services is hence another challenge (Amjad et al. 2015). The functionality of water systems differs from one another depending on the type of water system. Table 1 summarizes the functionality and general limitations associated with water systems.

Table 1 Functionality and general limitations of water systems (Foster 2013; Bonsor et al. 2015; Cronk and Bartram 2017; Sweya et al. 2017)

Table 1 indicates that the functionality of water systems is susceptible to various limitations. This information reveals that water obtained using these systems must be treated to remove contaminants. This can exquisitely be achieved using water purification systems such as slow sand filter, ceramic filter, bone char, bio sand filter and membrane purifier (Kiagho et al. 2016).

Common water treatment technologies available in Tanzania market

It has been reported that the common water treatment technologies for water treatment in Tanzania are slow sand filter, ceramic filter, bone char, bio sand filter and membrane purifier (Kiagho et al. 2016). Among them, ceramic filter has reportedly to be less expensive technology hence, it has been used in many countries (Brown et al. 2008; Farrow et al. 2018; Gupta et al. 2018).

Slow sand filter

A slow sand filter is a basic method for pathogen and particle removal (Lengbanch et al. 2009a, b). Larger bacteria are unable to pass through the pores of the slow sand filter (Thompson 2014). Physical, chemical and biological means of removing bacteria and suspended particles in raw water can be done by using slow sand filter (Lengbanch et al. 2009a, b; Bauer et al. 2011a, b; Ijadunolaet al. 2011). Slow sand is very effective in removal of turbidity and TSS than other water contaminants. Nevertheless, slow sand filter is poor in removing color. Routine cleaning can harm the bio layer and decrease the effectiveness of the filter. But also when using a slow sand filter, there’s a sudden change in flow rate (Kiagho et al. 2016).

Bone char

Bone char plays an important role as an adsorbent in water pollution due to its outstanding physicochemical properties (Flores-Cano et al. 2016). It is widely used in the water deflouridation process (Medellin-Castillo et al. 2015). Bone char is very effective in removing. Escherichia coli, organic matter and turbidity. Bone char has been very effective in fluoride removal compared to other filters in India, Thailand and Tanzania (Mjengera and Mkongo 2003; Kaseva 2006; Kiagho et al. 2016). If the media of bone char is not well prepared it can produce odor and bad taste. In addition, the media need to be changed when the quality of produced water does not meet the acceptable standard level (Kiagho et al. 2016). There is a need to find an alternative way of preparing a bone char so that it can be effective in water treatment.

Bio sand filter

Bio sand filter is widely used in remote rural areas in Tanzania. Using bio sand filter can reduce diarrheal diseases by 50% or greater (Ngai et al. 2014; Stauber et al. 2009; Tiwari et al. 2009; Liang et al. 2010; Aiken et al, 2011). Bio sand filter shows best performance in E. coli removal than all common water filters. The ability of bio sand filter in turbidity removal is very high (Kiagho et al. 2016). The biggest challenge of bio sand filter is its inability to remove fluoride in water.

Membrane purifier

Membrane purifier is made up by activated carbon and other extra filter bags for lime, arsenic and heavy metals. Membrane purifier is very effective in removing E. coli, TSS and turbidity (Kiagho et al. 2016). The ability of membrane purifier in color removal is also very high than other common water filters but it has no ability to remove fluoride.

Ceramic filter

According to Agbo et al. (2017), ceramic filters are inexpensive and effective type of water filter that involve passing water through a permeable ceramic material. This ceramic-based water purification technology has been used in many countries in the world (Brown et al. 2008; Farrow et al. 2018; Gupta et al. 2018). Distinct reports have shown that ceramic-based purification system can be adopted in local communities. In Cambodia, Dominican Republic of India, and Sri Lanka, clay ceramic filters have been used for ensuring the provision of safe and clean water (Brown et al. 2008; Gupta et al. 2018). The technology has also been employed in providing clean water in rural China as well (Farrow et al. 2018). However, little has been practiced in Tanzania and the products lack practical validation under local conditions (Kiagho et al. 2016; Lemons et al. 2016).

Effectiveness of common water filters

The current review compares the effectiveness water filters to the standards set by WHO. The minimal health risk standard set by WHO is 99.9% removal of water contaminants signifying that a filter capable of removing water contaminants up to 99.9% seems to be most effective. Each common water filter was evaluated basing on its ability to remove several water contaminants. Customarily, the efficiency of common filters depends on the type of water contaminants to be removed. Studies show that there is no filter that can remove 100% of all water contaminants. Table 2 summarizes the efficiency of common water filters in Tanzanian market. It can be observed that bio sand filter is very effective in removing E. coli when compared to other common filters available in Tanzania market. Bone char filter is effective in removing fluoride in water. This is used mostly by people living in the Northern part of Tanzania due to the presence of high fluorinated water. It was also observed that the ability of most filter to remove virus is low, hence a need for improving water filters to resolve that challenge.

Table 2 Summary of the efficiency of common water filters in Tanzanian market on different studies (Kiagho et al. 2016; Lindgren and Overcrona 2016; Nigri et al. 2016; Mtavangu et al. 2017; Yaseen et al. 2019; Zachery and Oyanedel-Cravel 2022)

Fabrication of ceramic water filter

The concept of ceramic-based water purification system has existed for a while and has been utilized in different forms. Contemporary ancient references approved that the existence of ceramic water filters with safe storage elements have been extensively used in Latin America for more than 100 years and have been produced in Britain since 1850 (Sobsey et al. 2008). Silver nanoparticles have been successfully used in water treatment applications (Haider et al. 2019, 2016; Hilonga et al. 2018; Dang et al. 2013). On the other hand, it has been discovered that the use of metal oxide is critical in the removal of organic contaminants from industrially contaminated water (Mutuma et al. 2015). Furthermore, adding hydroxyapatite or activated carbon to ceramic water filters can remove up to 93% of chemicals (Farrow et al. 2018). Interestingly, ceramic water filters with improved water purification properties can be prepared using locally available materials such as sawdust, rice husk ashes, flour and soil. The obtained water filter systems can be very essential in removing most of water contaminants, especially viruses which are very small in size.

Role of government in ensuring adequate water supply

Sustainable Development Goal 6 calls for provision of clean water and sanitation for all people. The impact of waterborne diseases can be very devastating if safe and clean water is not provided. Despite, the existence of vast water sources in Tanzania, the majority of people especially rural dwellers do not have access to safe and clean water. The global organizations such as UN set goals to halve population without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation by 2015 (Thompson 2014). To date, there is inadequate access to safe water. The Tanzania Government supplied water in different areas through municipal systems. However, not all people have access to municipal system (Kilungo et al. 2018). There is a need for Tanzania government to increase efforts to combat the problem associated with waterborne diseases by investing in other water purification technologies.


The findings have shown that all common water filters are effective in removing certain water contaminants. The most common water filters used in Tanzania are very effective in removing turbidity. However, the ability of filters to remove fluoride and virus is still a big challenge. The usage of water filters that are poor at eliminating a variety of pollutants has made it more difficult to eradicate the problem of waterborne diseases. Increased efforts by the government, non-governmental organizations, policy makers, rural dwellers, and other stakeholders are needed to eradicate waterborne diseases. Several techniques are required, including fabrication of effective ceramic filters using locally accessible materials such as rice husk, sawdust, clay, and flour. Ceramic filters are less expensive than other water filtration technologies and may easily be embraced by the majority of people, particularly those who live in rural areas. The designing of ceramic-based water purification system capable of removing viruses and fluoride is in high demand, and the implementation of new designed ceramic filter is highly required.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Biological oxygen demand


Chemical oxygen demand

E. coli :

Escherichia coli




Fecal coliform


Klein, Schanzlin & Becker




Point of use


Total suspended solids


United Nations


United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organizations


World Health Organization


  • Agbo SC, Ekpunobi EU, Onu CC, Akapomie KG (2017) Development of ceramic filter for household treatment. Int Multidiscip Sci Eng 6(10):1823

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken BA, Stauber CE, Ortiz GM, Sobsey MD (2011) An assessment of continued use and health impact of the concrete bio sand filter in Bonao, Dominican Republic. Am J Trop Med Hyg 85:309–317

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainea N, Matofali AX, Mkwizu M (2019) Optimal control analysis of a cholera disease transmission model in Tanzania. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 4(4):865–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajibade J, Adewumi JR, Oguntuase AM (2014) Suitable approach to wastewater management in the Federal University of Technology, Ankuse, Nigeria. J Technolol Res 9(2):27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amjad U, Ojomo E, Downs K, Cronk R, Bartram J (2015) Rethinking sustainability, scalling up and enabling environment: a framework for their implementation in drinking water supply. Water 7(4):1497–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartram J, Lewis K, Lenton R, Wright J (2005) Focusing on improved water and sanitation for and reduce child diarrhea in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 365:810–812

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer R, Dicer H, Ingeborg G, Karl-Hein R, Pilau JML (2011a) Removal of bacteria fecal indicators, coliphages and enteric adenoviruses from water with high fecal pollution by slow sand filtration. Water Res 45(2):439–452

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer R, Dizer H, Graeber I, Rosenwinkel K, López-Pila JM (2011b) Removal of bacterial fecal indicators, coliphages and enteric adenoviruses from water with high fecal pollution by slow and filtration. Water Res 45:439–452.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg PA (2015) The world need for household water treatment. J Am Water Work Assoc 107(10):36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsor H, Oates N, Chilton P, Carter, Casey V, MacDonald A, Bennie M (2015) A hidden crisis: strengthening the evidence base on the current failure of rural ground water supplies. In: Shaw RJ (ed) Water, sanitation and hygiene services beyond 2015: improving access and sustainability. Proceedings of the 38th WEDC international conference, Loughborough, UK, 27–31 July

  • Brown J, Sobsey MD, Loomis D (2008) Local drinking water filters reduce diarrheal disease in Cambodia: a randomized, controlled trial of the ceramic water purifier. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70(3):394–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk DR, Bartram J (2017) Factors influencing water system functionality in Nigeria and Tanzania: a regression and Bayesian network analysis. Environ Sci Technol 51(19):11336–11345.

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang VQ, Lee JE, Kim JK, Kim YN, Shao GN, Kim HT (2013) A gentle method to graft thiol-functional groups onto silica gel for adsorption of silver ions and immobilization of silver nanoparticles. Powder Technol 235:221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrow C, McBean E, Salsali H (2014) Virus removal efficiency of ceramic water filter: effects of bentonite turbidity. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 14(2):304–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrow C, MacBean E, Huang G, Liu Z, Li YP, Dai ZN, Fu HY, Caute T, Wu YC, Yang AL (2018) Ceramic water filters: a point of use water treatment technology to remove bacteria from drinking water in Longhai City, Fijian Province, China. J Environ Inform 32(2):63–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Cano JV, Levya-Ramos R, Carrasco-Marin F (2016) Adsorption mechanism of chromium (III) from water solution on bone char: effect of operating conditions. Adsorption 22:297–308

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster T (2013) Predictors of sustainability for community managed hand pumps in sub-Saharan Africa. Evidence from Liberia, Sierra Leone and Uganda. Environ Sci Technol 47(21):12037–12046.

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furey S (2014) Hand pumps: where now? A synthesis of online discussion (2012–2014). Retrieved from https://www.ruralwatersupply.Net/en/resources/details/614. Retrieved 21 March 2022

  • Gupta S, Satankar RK, Kaurwar A, Aravind U, Sharif M, Plappally A (2018) Household production of ceramic filters in Western Rajasthan, India. Int J Serv Learn Eng Humanit Eng Soc Entrep 13(1):53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider MS, Shao GN, Imran SM, Park SS, Abbas N, Hussain M, Bae W, Tahir MS, Kim HT (2016) Aminatedpolyethersulfone-silver nanoparticles (AgNPs-APES) composite membranes with controlled silver iron release for antibacterial and water treatment applications. Mater Sci Eng C 62:732–745

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haider SM, Shao GN, Ahmad A, Imran SM, Abbas N, Ghulam A, Kim HT (2019) Facile, single-pot preparation of nanoporous SiO2 particles (carrier) with AgNPs at core and crust for controlled disinfectant release. J Saudi Chem Soc 23(7):828–835

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilonga A, Kim J, Sarawade PB, Dang VQ, Shao GN, Elineema G, Kim HT (2018) Silver-doped silica powder with antibacterial properties. Powder Technol 215:219–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Ijadunola JA, Adewumi JR, Oguntade AM, Oguntade MJ (2011) Comparative study on the filtration properties of local sand, rice hull and rice hull ash. Sacha J Environ Stud 1(2):103–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaseva ME (2006) Optimization of regenerated bone char for fluoride removal in drinking water: a case study in Tanzania. J Water Health 14:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiagho B, Machunda R, Hilonga A, Njau K (2016) Efficiency of water filters towards the removal of selected pollutants in Arusha. Tanzania Tanzan J Sci 42(1):136–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilungo A, Powers L, Anorld N, Whelan K, Paterson K, Young D (2018) Evaluation of well designs to improve access to safe water and clean water in rural Tanzania. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(1):64

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klug T, Cronk R, Shields FK, Bartram J (2018) A categorization of water system breakdowns: evidence from Liberia, Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda. The water Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States. Sci Total Environ 619–620:1126–1132.

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemons A, Branz A, Kimirei M, Hawkins T, Lantagne D (2016) Assessment of the quality, effectiveness, and acceptability of ceramic water filters in Tanzania. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 6(2):195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengbanch K, Kuschk P, Horn H, Kastner M (2009a) Slow sand filtration of secondary clarifier effluent for wastewater reuse. Environ Sci Technol 43(15):5896–5901

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengbanch K, Kuschk P, Horn H, Kastner M (2009b) Slow sand filtration of secondary clarifier effluent for waste water reuse. Environ Sci Technol 43(15):5896–5901

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang K, Sobsey M, Stauber C (2010) Field note: improving household water quality- use of biosand filters in Cambodia. Water and sanitation program-Cambodia 2010. Accessed 17 Sept 2021

  • Lindgren J, Overcrona Z (2016) Water purification with a bio-sand filter in Tanzania: a minor field study- Karagwe District, Tanzania. Environmental science. Corpus ID: 133836224

  • Medellin-Castillo NA, Leyva- Ramos R, Padilla-Ortega E (2015) Adsorption capacity of bone char for removing fluoride from water solution. Role of hydroxyapatite content, adsorption mechanism and competing anions. J Ind Eng Chem 20:4014–4021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor MR, Abebe L, Ehdaie B, Dillingham R, Smith J (2014) Modelling the sustainability of a ceramic water intervention. Water Res 49:286–299.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mjengera H, Mkongo G (2003) appropriatedefluoridation technology for use in fluorotic areas in Tanzania. Phys Chem Earth 28:1097–1104

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed H, Clasen T, Njee RM, Malebo HM, Mbuligwe S, Brown J (2016) Microbiological effectiveness of household water treatment technologies under field use conditions in rural Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health 21:33–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mtavangu S, Rugaika AM, Hilonga A, Karoli NN (2017) Performance of constructed wetland integrated with sand filters for treating high turbid water for drinking. Water Pract Technol 12:25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukaratirwa-Muchayenyereyi N, Tigere W, Hokonya N, Gusha C, Guyo U, Nyoni S (2020) Preparation and performance characterization of ceramic/silver nanoparticle composite in water purification. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 17(3):1522–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy H, Sampson M, McBean E, Farabakhsh K (2010a) Influence of household practices on the performance of clay pot water filters in rural Cambodia. Desalin J Water Health 252:145–152.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy H, McBean E, Farahbakhsh K (2010b) Microbial and chemical assessment of ceramic and bio sand water filters in rural Cambodia. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 10:286–295.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy H, McBean E, Farahbakhsh K (2010c) A critical evaluation of two point-of-use water treatment technologies: can they provide water that meets WHO drinking water guidelines? J Water Health 8:611–630.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutuma BK, Shao GN, Kim WD, Kim HT (2015) Sol-gel synthesis of mesoporous anatase-brookite-rutile TiO2 nanoparticles and their photocatalytic properties. J Colloid Interface Sci 442:1–7.

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngai TKK, Coff B, Baker D, Lentz R (2014) Global review of the adoption, use and performance of bio-sand filter. In: Progress in slow sand and alternative bio filtration processes, vol 14, pp 309–317

  • Nigri EM, Bhatnagar A, Rocha SDF (2016) Thermal regeneration process of bone char used in the fluoride removal from acqueous solution. J Prod 10:101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Quang DV, Eun LJ, Kim J, Na Y, Shao GN, Kim HT (2013) A gentle method to graft thiol-functional groups onto silica gel for adsorption of silver ions and immobilization of silver nanoparticles. Powder Technol 235:221–227

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren D, Colosi LM, Smith JA (2013) Evaluating the sustainability of ceramic filters for point-<br>of-use drinking water treatment. Environ Sci Technol 47(19):11206–11213.

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobsey M, Brown J, Loomis D (2008) Estimating child mortality due to diarrheal diseases in Cambodia: a randomized, controlled trial of the ceramic water purifier. Am J Trop Med Hyg 79(3):394–400

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauber CE, Ortiz GM, Loomis DP, Sobsey MD (2009) A randomized controlled trial of the concrete biosand filter and its impact on diarrheal diseases in Bonao, Dominican Republic. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80:286–293

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan RK, Erickson M, Oyanedel-Craver VA (2017) Undersatnding the microbiological, organic and inorganic contaminant removal capacity of ceramic water filters doped with different silver nanoparticles. Environ Sci 4(12):2348–2355

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sweya LN, Wilkinson S, Chang-Richard A (2017) A understanding water systems resilience problems in Tanzania. Department of civil and Environmental engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland. New Zealand. Procedia Eng 212:488–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TDHS (2010) Monitoring of organic pollutants in Thane creek water. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 4(4):633–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson M (2014) A critical review of water purification technology appropriate for developingcountries; Northern Ghana as a case study. Desalin Water Treat 54(13):1–7.

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari S, Schmidt WP, Darby J, Kariuki ZG, Jenkis MW (2009) Intermittent slow sand filtration for preventing diarrhea among children in households using unimproved water sources: a randomized controlled trial. Trop Med Int Health 14:1374–1382

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugya AY, Aiibade TF, Ajibade FO (2018) Water pollution resulting from mining activity. In: Annual conference of the School of Engineering Technology (SEET); Need-driven engineering research for entrepreneurial development in developing countries. 3rd International conference held at Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria 17th–19th July 2018, pp 703–718

  • UN (2017) WHO/UNICEF joint monitoring programme 2017 report. Retrieved 14 Dec 2021

  • UN (2019) The United Nations world water development report 2019: leaving no one behind. Retrieved 18.Dec 2021

  • UNESCO (2017) Report of bioethical response to the situation of refugees.

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2017) Guidelines for drinking water quality, 4th ed. Accessed 15 June 2021

  • Yaseen MZ, Zigade TT, Kumar DR, Salih SQ, Awasthi S, Tung MT, Al-insari N, Bhagat KS (2019) Laundry waste water treatment using a combination of sand filter, bio sand filter and teff straw media. Sci Rep 9:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachery S, Oyanedel-Cravel V (2022) A review of the impact of training conditions on the performance and quality control of locally manufactured, point-of-use ceramic water filters. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 8:510–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge Mkwawa University College of Education (MUCE) for material support.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



FEK participated in designing, writing, and submission of the manuscript. GNS Origination of the water purification systems idea, conducted research relating to the efficiency of common water filters and final approval of the version to be submitted. CF Organization of manuscript, editing of the manuscript and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. EE Major Contributor in writing the manuscript and interpretation of the relevant literature. All authors proofread the work before submission. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Godlisten N. Shao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publications

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komba, F.E., Fabian, C., Elimbinzi, E. et al. Efficiency of common filters for water treatment in Tanzania. Bull Natl Res Cent 46, 208 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Waterborne diseases
  • Filters
  • Water contaminants
  • Tanzania