Skip to main content

Antioxidant activities of spray-dried carotenoids using maltodextrin-Arabic gum as wall materials

Abstract

Background

Carotenoids are natural pigments that are highly sensitive to light, heat, acids, oxygen, metals, and free radicals, which degrade the antioxidant activities of carotenoids. Microencapsulation techniques have been used to prevent carotenoid degradation and preserve their antioxidant activities. In this work, we aimed to encapsulate mamey (Pouteria sapota) and carrot (Daucus carota) carotenoids in mixtures of maltodextrin (10% w/v) and Arabic gum (5 or 10% w/v) by spray-drying. The obtained powders were stored at different temperatures (4 and 25 °C) with or without access to daylight, and changes in color, carotenoid content, and antioxidant activity were analyzed monthly for three months. Moreover, the in vivo antioxidant activities of spray-dried carotenoids were evaluated in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Results

The carotenoid and antioxidant activity losses of stored carotenoids were found in the following order: 25 °C in daylight > 25 °C without access to daylight > 4 °C without access to daylight. Moreover, the combination of maltodextrin and Arabic gum (10%) was more effective to prevent carotenoid loss compared to maltodextrin and Arabic gum (5%). In vivo antioxidant activity results showed that spray-dried carotenoids reduced approximately 30% of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in nematodes, even after three months of storage.

Conclusions

Mamey and carrot carotenoids were successfully encapsulated by the spray-drying technique. The spray-dried carotenoids effectively reduced the intracellular ROS levels and neutralized the oxidative stress damage in C. elegans, even after three months of storage. Moreover, the antioxidant activities of mamey carotenoids were equally effective as those of carrot carotenoids, meaning that mamey carotenoids could be seen as an alternative source of carotenoids.

Background

Carotenoids are a group of water-insoluble natural pigments, providing yellow, orange, and red colors to fruits and vegetables, such as carrot, tomato, mango, orange, guava, pepper, and sweet potato. They comprise repetitive units of isoprene with double conjugated bonds responsible for their colors and antioxidant activities (Saini et al. 2015). However, carotenoids are highly sensitive to light, heat, acids, oxygen, metals, and free radicals, which are commonly found during food processing (Faria et al. 2010). This leads to structural changes, such as cycling, migration of double bonds, and addition of oxygen molecules, resulting in epoxy-carotenoids and apocarotenoids, which lost their biological activity (Ribeiro et al. 2018; Thakur et al. 2017).

One approach to prevent the degradation of carotenoids and preserve their antioxidant activities is to use encapsulation techniques, which not only improve their stability but also impact their bioavailability and solubility (Capelezzo et al. 2018). Encapsulation techniques consist of coating one or more sensitive substances (pigments, antioxidants, essential oils, and drugs) with another component that acts as a barrier and protects them from environmental conditions (Gul et al. 2015).

Microencapsulation involves covering a liquid, solid, or gaseous substance with a surrounding material (wall material) (Janiszewska-Turak 2017). Spray-drying is the most commonly used technique in the food industry for microencapsulation due to equipment availability and low production costs, especially when compared to other encapsulation techniques (Corrêa-Filho et al. 2019a, b; de Marco et al. 2013), such as freeze-drying (Capelezzo et al. 2018) coacervation (Soukoulis and Bohn 2018), drum-drying (Desobry et al. 1997) or extrusion (Rehman et al. 2020). Spray-drying consists of the formation of fine particles by passing a suspension through a sprayer in which compressed air heated to high temperatures flows. The flow of hot air causes particle dehydration and powder formation within which a substance is encapsulated (Gul et al. 2015). This allows obtaining stable powders with sizes ranging between 1 and 1000 μm at low cost and short production period using relatively low temperatures, enabling the encapsulation of thermolabile compounds and enhancing the stability of encapsulated substances (Mestry et al. 2011). Several researchers have employed the spray-drying technique for microencapsulation of various carotenoids, for example, astaxanthin (Pu et al. 2011; Shen and Quek 2014), β-carotene (Corrêa-Filho et al. 2019a, b; Desobry et al. 1997; Lim and Roos 2016; Przybysz et al. 2018, 2016; Shaaruddin et al. 2019), canthaxanthin (Hojjati et al. 2014), lutein (Lim and Roos 2016; Wang et al. 2012), and lycopene (Corrêa-Filho et al. 2019; Shu et al. 2006). They found that their stability improved under different storage conditions.

The stability and retention time of a pigment during microencapsulation and storage strongly depend on the wall material type employed to form the particles. Arabic gum (AG) is an effective carrier because of its high water solubility, low solution viscosity, and ability to form a protective film around the particles of the pigment (Przybysz et al. 2018). Maltodextrin (MD) also can be applied as a coating material at lower costs instead of AG, which constitutes an effective anti-oxygen barrier, have low viscosity, and is available in different average molecular weights (Desobry et al. 1997; Przybysz et al. 2018). Mesquite gum (MG), a natural exudate from the mesquite tree, is a neutral salt of a complex acidic branched polysaccharide, which has been reported as a good encapsulating agent (EA) (Beristain et al. 1999; Jiménez-Aguilar et al. 2011). However, the use of mixtures of AG and MD (de Marco et al. 2013; Przybysz et al. 2016) or MG and MD (Beristain et al. 1999) are more effective than their individual use.

Mamey sapote (Pouteria sapota) is a tropical fruit of high nutritional value, native from Mexico and Central America, recognized as an alternative source of carotenoids and vitamin A (Moo-Huchin et al. 2014; Murillo et al. 2013; Yahia et al. 2011). The mamey fruit is characterized by its smooth texture, sweet flavor, and salmon-red pulp (Pinto et al. 2016). Therefore, the mamey is usually consumed fresh or as an ingredient in jam, ice cream, gelatin, yogurt, and desserts (Alia-Tejacal et al. 2007).

In this work, we aimed to evaluate the carotenoid retention and antioxidant activities of mamey (Pouteria sapota) and carrot (Daucus carota) carotenoids microencapsulated in mixtures of MD–AG and MD–MG stored at different temperature and light conditions. Moreover, the in vivo antioxidant activities of the carotenoids were evaluated in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Microencapsulation of mamey and carrot carotenoid extracts by spray drying can result in stable powders of mamey and carrot carotenoids that preserve their antioxidant capacities, in vitro and in vivo, under different storage conditions.

Methods

Sample preparation

Mamey (Pouteria sapota) and carrot (Daucus carota) were purchased at local supermarket in the city of Puebla, Mexico. Mamey and carrot carotenoids were extracted based on the method described elsewhere (Moo-Huchin et al. 2014). Briefly, 10 g of mamey pulp or carrot were mixed with 50 mL of a hexane: acetone: ethanol solution (70: 15: 15 v/v/v) and stirred for 1 h. Afterwards, 5 mL of 40% KOH was added and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 2 h. Then, 30 mL of hexane was added, the mixture was shaken vigorously, the upper layer was collected, filtered through Na2SO4 powder to remove traces of water, and dissolved in ethanol. Mamey (10.70 ± 0.20 mg β-carotene/100 g fresh weight) or carrot (13.83 ± 0.23 mg β-carotene/100 g fresh weight) carotenoid solutions were mixed with a combination of MD DE 10 (CP Ingredients, Mexico) and AG (CP Ingredients, Mexico) or MG (Gomas Naturales, Mexico), as indicated in Table 1.

Table 1 Carotenoid solutions and conditions for spray-drying

Spray-drying

Drying of all solutions was performed in a laboratory-scale spray-dryer (Büchi B-290, Switzerland) using an aspersion nozzle diameter of 150 μm, inlet temperature of 160 °C, and feeding flow rate of 10 mL/min. Outlet temperatures and total soluble solids (TSS) are shown in Table 1. The collected powders were weighted, stored in glass bottles, sealed in plastic bags, and kept at room temperature to prevent water intake until further analysis.

Characterization of microcapsules

Particle size

The particle diameter of each powder was measured with an automatic particle analyzer (Microtrac Bluewave S3500, USA). Determinations were performed in duplicate.

Color

The color was determined from the CIELab scale parameters L* (lightness), a* (redness), and b* (yellowness) using a Konica Minolta colorimeter (CR-400, Konica Minolta S.A., Germany) with a 1-cm path length of the optical glass cell (10 mL of the sample). Solutions of each powder were prepared by dissolving 2.70 g of each carotenoid powder in 10 mL water (Jiménez-Aguilar et al. 2011). Before the determinations, the colorimeter was calibrated with a white pattern. Additionally, the net color change (∆E) was calculated from Eq. 1. Determinations were performed in triplicate.

$$\Delta E = \sqrt {\left( {L^{^\circ } - L^{*} } \right)^{2} + (a^{^\circ } - a^{*} )^{2} + (b^{^\circ } - b^{*} )^{2} }$$
(1)

Moisture content and water activity

To determine the moisture contents of the powders, the gravimetric method AOAC 930.15 (2000) was used. Samples were dried at 105 °C for 24 h inside an oven. The water activities were measured at room temperature using a dew-point hygrometer (AQUA LAB, 4TEV, Decagon Devices, Inc., USA). Determinations were performed in triplicate.

Density

Bulk density was calculated by weighing 2 g of each powder and measuring its volume in a 10-mL test tube. Compacted density was determined by measuring the volume occupied by the same mass of powder in the test tube after 425 hits. Additionally, Hausner's index (HR) was determined using Eq. 2. Determinations were performed in triplicate.

$${\text{Hausner}}^{{\prime }} {\text{s}}\;{\text{ index}} = \frac{{{\text{Compacted}}\;{\text{density}}}}{{{\text{Bulk}}\;{\text{density}}}}$$
(2)

Water solubility

200 mg of each powder was dissolved in 10 mL distilled water. The mixture was centrifuged at 760 × g for 10 min (Centrifuge Z 366 K, HERMLE Labortechnik, Germany), then 9 mL of the suspension was removed, and the residue was dried at 105 °C for 24 h (Montero et al. 2016). Water solubility was calculated using Eq. 3. Determinations were performed in triplicate.

$${\text{Solubility}}\;{\text{(\% )}} = \frac{{{\text{Final}}\;{\text{weight}} \times \left( \frac{10}{9} \right)}}{{{\text{Initial}}\;{\text{weight}}}}$$
(3)

Carotenoid content and antioxidant activity

Carotenoid solutions were prepared by dissolving 1.35 g of each carotenoid powder in 5 mL distilled water (Jiménez-Aguilar et al. 2011). The absorbances of prepared solutions were analyzed at 450 nm (Genesys 10S UV–Vis spectrophotometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), using MD–AG or MD–MG solutions as blanks. A calibration curve was prepared using β-carotene (0–20 ppm) (purity > 97%, Sigma-Aldrich, Mexico) in ethanol using pure ethanol as the blank. Results were expressed as μg β-carotene/g powder. Determinations were performed in triplicate.

The antioxidant capacities of carotenoid extracts were determined by the method developed by Re et al. (1999) with some modifications. The ABTS•+ radical cations were produced by reacting 7 mM ABTS ([2,2´-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid]; Sigma-Aldrich, Mexico) with 2.45 mM K2S2O8 and allowing the mixture to stand at room temperature in the dark for 16 h. Then, the solution was diluted with ethanol to an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.02 at 734 nm (Genesys 10S UV–Vis spectrophotometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and recorded as the initial absorbance. Then, 980 µL diluted ABTS•+ was mixed with 20 µL carotenoid microcapsule solutions, and the absorbance was measured after 6 min. The percentage of inhibition was calculated by Eq. 4:

$${\text{Inhibition}} \left( \% \right) = \left( {\frac{{{\text{Initial}}\;{\text{absorbance}} - {\text{Final}}\;{\text{absorbance}}}}{{{\text{Initial}}\;{\text{absorbance}}}}} \right) \times 100\%$$
(4)

A calibration curve was prepared by dissolving Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethychroman-2-carboxylic acid; Sigma-Aldrich, Mexico) in ethanol. Trolox solutions (0–1500 µM) were subjected to the same treatment with ABTS•+, as previously described, using pure ethanol as the blank. Results were expressed as µmole of Trolox equivalents antioxidant capacity (TEAC)/g powder. Determinations were performed in triplicate.

In vivo antioxidant activity assay

The biological model used was a wild (Bristol N2) C. elegans strain fed with bacteria, uracil auxotroph, Escherichia coli OP50. Both organisms were obtained through the Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences of Universidad de las Américas Puebla.

To examine intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, adult nematodes were synchronized to obtain eggs (Surco-Laos et al. 2011), which were then placed in nematode growth medium (NGM) plates supplemented with carotenoid microcapsules (0 and 15 μg/mL), and they were incubated at 22 ± 2 °C until reaching the L3 stage. Upon reaching the L3 stage, 15 nematodes were transferred to new NGM plates with 100 µM 5-fluoro-2´-deoxyuridine (FUdR; Sigma-Aldrich, Mexico) to prevent progeny production and the pro-oxidant 150 µM 5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (juglone; Sigma-Aldrich, Mexico) to induce oxidative stress for 12 h. Upon reaching the adult stage, nematodes were transferred into 200 µL M9 buffer containing 250 µM 2´,7´-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH2-DA; Sigma-Aldrich, Mexico) and were incubated in the dark for 1.5 h. Then, nematodes were placed in 50 µL M9 buffer containing 10 mM sodium azide for anesthesia, transferred into a thin dried agarose pad above a glass slide, and were mounted onto the fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axio Imager 2, Jena, Germany) for capturing the fluorescence of the oxidized product DCF (Ren et al. 2017). To quantify DCF fluorescence, images were analyzed using ImageJ software.

Storage conditions

Carotenoid microcapsules were stored in Petri dishes (55 × 10 mm) inside polystyrene bags. They were kept at 25 °C in the presence of light and at 4 and 25 °C in the absence of light (Jiménez-Aguilar et al. 2011). Changes in color, carotenoid content, and antioxidant activities of carotenoid microcapsules were analyzed in triplicate at the beginning, first, second, and third month of storage, whereas their in vivo antioxidant activities were determined at the beginning and end of storage.

Statistical analysis

Data were evaluated using ANOVA and means comparison routines (Fisher, p < 0.05), using Minitab Statistical Software (19th version, Minitab Inc., USA).

Results

Characterization of microcapsules

The yields obtained for mamey and carrot carotenoid solutions were 74% (MAG5), 85% (MAG10), 74% (CAG5), 75% (CAG10), 69% (MMG5), 76% (MMG10), 72% (CMG5) and 77% (CMG10). Slight differences in the yield of the eight systems were observed; however, higher yields were achieved with the MD–AG mixture. Regardless of the composition of the wall material, the encapsulation of carotenoids was achieved. Mamey microcapsules showed a salmon-pink color, while carrot microcapsules showed a yellow color. Carotenoid microcapsules (MD–AG) obtained by spray-drying are shown in Fig. 1. Table 2 shows the physical characteristics of mamey and carrot carotenoid microcapsules.

Fig. 1
figure1

Carotenoid microcapsules of mamey and carrot in a mixture of maltodextrin (10% w/v) and Arabic gum (5 or 10% w/v) as wall materials. a MAG5, b MAG10, c CAG5, d CAG10

Table 2 Characterization of mamey and carrot carotenoid microcapsules

Figure 2 shows color changes of carotenoid powders during storage. A value of ∆E > 5 is indicative of a significant and visually noticeable change from the initial color of powders. Thus, ∆E values close to or above 5 correspond to powders stored at 25 °C in daylight as these conditions accelerate the carotenoid (see Sect. 3.2.) and color losses (p < 0.05). Notably, powders stored in refrigeration (4 °C) showed minor color changes during storage. Moreover, L* increased and a* (mamey microcapsules)/b* (carrot microcapsules) decreased due to carotenoid losses as the storage temperature and period increased.

Fig. 2
figure2

Net color changes of mamey and carrot carotenoid microcapsules during storage. “Division slash” (25 °C in daylight); “Filled rectangle” (25 °C without access to daylight); “Filled diamond” (4 °C without access to daylight). a MAG5, b MAG10, c CAG5 and d CAG10. The data shown correspond to means ± SDs (n = 3)

Carotenoid contents and antioxidant activities of microcapsules

The combination of MD–AG as EAs resulted in microcapsules with 23.06 ± 0.26 (MAG5), 36.69 ± 0.38 (MAG10), 62.68 ± 0.25 (CAG5), and 73.50 ± 0.24 (CAG10) μg β-carotene/g powder, whereas the combination of MD–MG led to minor carotenoid contents, 19.62 ± 0.52 (MMG5), 16.06 ± 0.52 (MMG10), 20.34 ± 0.48 (CMG5) and 15.53 ± 0.40 (CMG10) μg β-carotene/g powder, due to higher outlet temperatures (Table 1). The in vitro antioxidant activities of the MD–AG microcapsules were 51.11 ± 4.30 (MAG5), 49.08 ± 2.21 (MAG10), 60.06 ± 1.52 (CAG5), and 61.53 ± 2.74 (CAG10) TEAC/g powder, whereas for the MD–MG microcapsules were 24.07 ± 3.42 (MMG5), 22.08 ± 2.79 (MMG10), 30.58 ± 2.48 (CMG5) and 31.23 ± 2.96 (CMG10) TEAC/g powder.

Cooler outlet temperatures such as the ones obtained for MD–AG microcapsules (Table 1) were more effective for the protection of carotenoids, leading to higher retention rates. For this reason, the storage studies and in vivo antioxidant activities were performed on only MD–AG microcapsules. Figure 3 shows the carotenoid contents of mamey and carrot microcapsules after three months of storage under different temperature and light conditions. The carotenoid contents in carrot powders were higher than those in mamey powders, and this is consistent with the data obtained from the extracts used for spray drying. Storage results showed that higher concentrations of EAs (10% MD and 10% AG) slowed down the carotenoid losses compared to the lower concentrations of EAs (10% MD and 5% AG) under the same storage conditions. In contrast, cooler storage temperatures reduce the rate of carotenoid degradation. At the end of the storage at 4 °C, almost 70% (MAG5 and CAG5) and 80% (MAG10 and CAG10) of carotenoids were preserved, showing that the use of MD and AG as EAs was effective (p < 0.05) to protect the carotenoids from degradation.

Fig. 3
figure3

Carotenoid contents of mamey and carrot microcapsules stored at different temperature and light conditions. “Filled triangle” (4 °C without access to daylight); ““Filled rectangle” (25 °C without access to daylight); ““Filled circle” (25 °C in daylight). a MAG5; b MAG10; c CAG5; d CAG10. The data shown correspond to means ± SDs (n = 3)

Figure 4 shows the in vitro antioxidant activities of mamey and carrot microcapsules after three months of storage under different temperature and light conditions. The decrease in the antioxidant activities follows the same trend that the powders exhibit for the carotenoid losses. Cooler temperatures, lack of daylight, and higher concentrations of EAs resulted in minor antioxidant activity losses.

Fig. 4
figure4

Antioxidant activities of mamey and carrot microcapsules stored at different temperature and light conditions. “Filled tritangle” (4 °C without access to daylight); “Filled rectangle” (25 °C without access to daylight); “Filled circle” (25 °C in daylight). a MAG5; b MAG10; c CAG5; d CAG10. The data shown correspond to means ± SDs (n = 3)

Figure 5 shows the ROS accumulation in the nematodes treated with MD–AG microparticles, expressed as the percentage of fluorescence relative to that of the control (nematodes not exposed to microparticles). At the beginning, nematodes treated with the carotenoid powders significantly decreased their intracellular ROS levels following exposure to juglone (p < 0.05). The ROS in the nematodes treated with MAG5 (76.63 ± 15.79%) and CAG5 (80.78 ± 8.12%) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in the nematodes treated with MAG10 (70.31 ± 12.06%) and CAG10 (70.71 ± 8.06%); but in all cases, the ROS accumulation decreased (p < 0.05) due to the presence of antioxidants when compared to untreated nematodes. Moreover, these results were consistent with previous in vitro antioxidant activity results, showing that a higher concentration of EAs provided better protection to the carotenoids and their antioxidant activities.

Fig. 5
figure5

In vivo antioxidant activities of carotenoid microcapsules stored for 3 months. Results are expressed as the percentage of fluorescence in relation to control nematodes, which were not exposed to microcapsule treatments. “White rectangle” (Untreated); “Division slash” (No storage, freshly spray-dried); “Filled rectangle” (Storage at 4 °C without access to daylight); “Vertial lines” (Storage at 25 °C in daylight); “Filled diamond” (Storage at 25 °C without access to daylight). Statistical significance of differences (α = 0.05) between control and treated nematodes were determined by ANOVA (Letters between bars indicate significant differences)

After storage for three months, the antioxidant activities of MAG5 and CAG5 microcapsules decreased significantly (p < 0.05) compared to their initial activities, and no significant differences (p > 0.05) were obtained between them and control nematodes due to major ROS accumulation in the nematodes, a phenomenon caused by the carotenoid loss upon storage (Fig. 3). On the other hand, no significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between MAG10 and CAG10 treatments, regardless of the storage conditions (25 °C in daylight, 25 °C without access to daylight, and 4 °C without access to daylight) or their antioxidant activities at the beginning of the storage, despite the carotenoid (Fig. 3) and in vitro antioxidant activity (Fig. 4) losses. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between control nematodes and the ones treated with MAG10 and CAG10 microcapsules, thus reducing the ROS accumulation. Moreover, these results suggest that mamey carotenoids possess an in vivo antioxidant activity similar to that of carrot carotenoids.

Discussion

Physical properties of microcapsules

Both the particle size (2.86–3.31 μm) and Hausner's index (1.52–1.91) indicate class "C" cohesive powders from Geldart's classification (1973). This powder type tends to form agglomerates of random size and shape due to interparticle forces between particles that affect their flow properties (Turki and Fatah 2008). The particle sizes of MD–AG (2.86–3.25 μm) and MD–MG (2.94–3.31 μm) microcapsules were smaller than the ones obtained by Faria et al. (2010) for β-carotene in MD (7.1 μm) or AG (10.7 μm), and by Hojjati et al. (2014) for canthaxanthin in soluble soybean polysaccharide (7.94 μm), AG (9.08 μm), or MD (10.42 μm). These differences are likely related to the temperatures used for spray-drying. Both authors used a temperature of 170 °C, whereas in this work 160 °C was used. In all cases, the microparticles tend to stick together through Van der Waals forces given that they have a larger contact surface, which increases particle size. These cohesion forces increase along with the temperature, leading to the formation of agglomerates (Esmailpour et al. 2015).

Moisture and water activity values of MAG5, MMG5, CAG5, and CMG5 were higher (p < 0.05) compared to those of MAG10, MMG10, CAG10, and CMG10, as MAG5, MMG5, CAG5, and CMG5 contain less amount of EAs and more water. Moreover, MAG10, MMG10, CAG10, and CMG10 microcapsules were more soluble in water (p < 0.05) as they can attract more water due to the increased interaction between particles and water molecules (Juscamaita Fabián et al. 2017). Moreover, de Marco et al. (2013) showed that bixin microencapsulation in MD–AG increased their water solubility by 72%. The increased solubility of carotenoids resulted in water-soluble powders, which can be used in aqueous systems, contrary to nonencapsulated carotenoids that are water-insoluble.

Carotenoid contents and antioxidant activities of microcapsules

The results of MD-AG microcapsules showed that the carotenoid contents in the carrot powders were significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to the mamey powders. These results are expected since the carotenoid contents in mamey are lower than in carrot (Alia-Tejacal et al. 2007). Moreover, it is evident from the carotenoid extracts that the content in carrot (13.83 ± 0.23 mg β-carotene/100 g fresh weight) is higher than in mamey (10.70 ± 0.20 mg β-carotene/100 g fresh weight). Nevertheless, Moo-Huchin et al. (2014) and Murillo et al. (2013) considered the mamey as an alternative source of carotenoids to the carrot, despite their differences in carotenoid contents.

The carotenoid contents in mamey (23.06–36.69 μg β-carotene/g powder) and carrot (62.68–73.50 μg β-carotene/g powder) powders were superior to the one obtained by Pu et al. (2011) for astaxanthin microcapsules (13.76 μg/g powder) in sodium caseinate-lactose (1:1). The stability and retention of carotenoids during microencapsulation depend on the wall material type employed to form the particles (Przybysz et al. 2018). Desobry et al. (1997) found that the spray-drying and encapsulation process with MD degraded 11% of β-carotene due to the high temperature employed in the drying process. Moreover, Wang et al. (2012) reported that the blend of starch and gelatin helped to retain 80% of the pre-drying lutein content in the microcapsules after spray-drying. Although high temperatures are used in the spray-drying process, microcapsules help to prevent extensive losses of carotenoids and their antioxidant activities (Aissa et al. 2012; Thakur et al. 2017).

The differences between the outlet temperatures of AG and MG systems are consistent with several studies, which indicate that the temperatures of GM microcapsules are higher than those of AG microcapsules. The temperatures of MG microcapsules vary from 80 °C (Carrillo-Navas et al. 2011; Jiménez-Aguilar et al. 2011), 95 °C (Jiménez-Aguilar et al. 2011), and 104 °C (Ochoa-Velasco et al. 2017), while the temperatures of AG microcapsules go from 70 °C (Bastías-Montes et al. 2019) to 80 °C (Bednarska & Janiszewska-Turak 2020).

The carotenoid losses increased as the storage temperature increased. Hojjati et al. (2014) and Lim and Roos (2016) reported that the carotenoid levels (canthaxanthin and β-carotene/lutein, respectively) in microcapsules decreased as the storage temperature increased. Similarly, Pu et al. (2011) reported that the astaxanthin content in astaxanthin microcapsules decreased by 26.17% (5 °C) and 39.83% (25 °C) after 26 days of storage. Furthermore, Desobry et al. (1997) and Przybysz et al. (2018) reported that β-carotene contents decreased 70% (15 weeks at 25 °C) and 54% (12 weeks at 20 °C) after storage.

Carotenoids are sensible to heat, oxidation, and light because of their unsaturated structure; therefore, they gradually degrade during storage (Pu et al. 2011). The results in Fig. 3 showed that daylight speeded up the degradation of carotenoids stored at 25 °C when compared to carotenoids stored at the same temperature without access to daylight. These results are consistent with color losses and major color changes (∆E > 5) shown in Fig. 2. Hojjati et al. (2014) reported that canthaxanthin retention values in soluble soybean polysaccharide, AG, and MD stored at 25 °C for 16 weeks with access to daylight were lower (58, 53, and 26%, respectively) when compared to powders without access to daylight (75, 72, and 57%, respectively).

The decreased antioxidant activities of the powders were closely related to the losses of carotenoids due to carotenoid oxidation and double bond losses (Jiménez-Aguilar et al. 2011), which are essential to maintain their antioxidant activities. However, the antioxidant activities of MAG10 microcapsules stored at 4 and 25 °C without access to daylight did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). This is interesting because under the same storage conditions, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the carotenoid contents of MAG10 microcapsules. Although the carotenoid contents in the microcapsules decreased, it is possible that a synergic effect exists between its components allowing to maintain its antioxidant activities during these storage conditions. This tendency was not observed in the rest of the microcapsules (MAG5, CAG5 and CAG10).

ROS measurement

The fluorescent probe DCFH2-DA is commonly used to detect fluorescence linked to ROS production in in vitro and in vivo assays. DCFH2-DA can easily penetrate the cellular membrane and is enzymatically deacetylated by esterases. This reaction converts DCFH2-DA into the nonfluorescent compound DCFH2, which is then rapidly oxidized to highly fluorescent DCF in the presence of ROS (Ren et al. 2017; Yoon et al. 2018). Since C. elegans can undergo experimental oxidative stress conditions upon exposure to certain pro-oxidant compounds (Zhou et al. 2011) leading to increased ROS levels, this characteristic allowed us to investigate the in vivo antioxidant capacity of carotenoid powders as the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of antioxidants could differ (You et al. 2015).

Previously, we investigated the antioxidant activities of mamey and carrot carotenoid extracts (20–40 μg/mL) and found that both increased the nematode survival by 20% to 40% (González-Peña et al. 2021). The effect of carotenoids on nematode survival has been well documented by Lashmanova et al. (2015), Pons et al. 2014, and You et al. (2015). Moreover, the protective effect of the carotenoids in C. elegans is related to their capacity to neutralize the ROS production and trigger the antioxidant defenses (Yazaki et al. 2011; You et al. 2015). In this work, mamey and carrot carotenoid microcapsules (15 μg/mL) could neutralize the ROS production up to 30%, especially in the nematodes treated with MAG10 and CAG10 when compared to nontreated nematodes. These results reveal the antioxidant potential of mamey and carrot carotenoids on living organisms through their capacity to quench singlet oxygen and deactivate free radicals, thus decreasing the ROS levels, and possibly by activating the antioxidant defenses such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase, modulating transcriptional factors and signaling pathways, and reducing the mitochondrial ROS production (Liu et al. 2016; Pons et al. 2014; Saini et al. 2015; Yazaki et al. 2011; You et al. 2015).

The in vivo antioxidant activities of different antioxidants, which are responsible for decreased ROS production induced through oxidative stress, have been investigated. Chen et al. (2013) found that resveratrol (200 μM) decreased ROS production by 40%, indicating both the antioxidant activity of resveratrol and the nematode's capacity to incorporate the antioxidant into its metabolism to protect it against oxidative stress damage. Similarly, You et al. (2015) found decreased levels of fluorescence due to the use of carotenoids BTS (58%) and β-carotene (4%). Moreover, Liu et al. (2016) and Yazaki et al. (2011) reported that astaxanthin decreased the mitochondrial ROS levels (40%) after exposure to the carotenoid. Lee et al. (2015) showed that vixetin (100 μM) decreased ROS levels by 15%, leading to increased resistance against oxidative stress. On the other hand, Jara-Palacios et al. (2013) found that nematodes fed with pomace extract (300 μg/mL) reduced their ROS production by 30%. In contrast, water-soluble antioxidants such as betalains (phenylethylamine-betaxanthin and indicaxanthin) have been proved to be highly effective in the nematode’s protection against oxidative stress, achieving up to 90% reduction in ROS production at the maximum concentration evaluated (100 μM) (Guerrero-Rubio et al. 2019). These results are consistent with our findings, showing that mamey and carrot carotenoids can effectively reduce the intracellular ROS levels and neutralize the oxidative stress damage of nematodes. Moreover, the in vivo antioxidant capacities of mamey and carrot carotenoids were equally effective to neutralize the oxidative stress damage, suggesting that mamey carotenoids are a good alternative to carrot carotenoids.

Conclusion

The combination of MD–AG provided successful encapsulation of mamey and carrot carotenoids by the spray-drying technique, whereas the combination of MD–MG was ineffective to properly encapsulate the carotenoids. In addition, the use of MD and AG at equal concentrations (1:1) was adequate to the encapsulation and retention of carotenoids. The decreasing order of the carotenoid content and antioxidant activity losses of stored carotenoids was 25 °C in daylight > 25 °C without access to daylight > 4 °C without access to daylight. The encapsulation of carotenoids prevented some losses of the initial carotenoid contents and antioxidant capacities in MAG10 (40–70%) and CAG10 (50–80%) microcapsules, after three months of storage regardless of the light and temperature conditions. Mamey and carrot carotenoid microcapsules showed the capacity to reduce the oxidative stress damage in C. elegans. Regardless the overall loss of carotenoids and decreased antioxidant activities in all storage conditions, the spray-dried carotenoids could counteract ROS production in nematodes by 30%. Furthermore, these results revealed the potential of mamey as an alternative source of carotenoids, whose antioxidant capacity is on par with that of carrot.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

∆E:

Net color change

a*:

Redness

ABTS:

2,2´-Azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)

AG:

Arabic gum

b*:

Yellowness

BTS:

13,13′-p-Tolyl β-carotene

CAG10:

Carrot microcapsules with maltodextrin (10%) and Arabic gum (5%)

CAG5:

Carrot microcapsules with maltodextrin (10%) and Arabic gum (5%)

CMG10:

Carrot microcapsules with maltodextrin (10%) and Mesquite gum (10%)

CMG5:

Carrot microcapsules with maltodextrin (10%) and Mesquite gum (5%)

CONACYT:

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología

DCFH2-DA:

2´,7´-Dichlorofluorescein diacetate

EA:

Encapsulating agent

FUdR:

5-Fluoro-2´-deoxyuridine

HR:

Hausner’s index

L*:

Lightness

MAG10:

Mamey microcapsules with maltodextrin (10%) and Arabic gum (10%)

MAG5:

Mamey microcapsules with maltodextrin (10%) and Arabic gum (5%)

MD:

Maltodextrin

MG:

Mesquite gum

MMG10:

Mamey microcapsules with maltodextrin (10%) and Mesquite gum (5%)

MMG5:

Mamey microcapsules with maltodextrin (10%) and Mesquite gum (5%)

NGM:

Nematode growth medium

SD:

Standard deviation

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

TEAC:

Trolox equivalents antioxidant capacity

TSS:

Total soluble solids

UDLAP:

Universidad de las Américas Puebla

References

  1. Alia-Tejacal I, Villanueva-Arce R, Pelayo-Zaldívar C, Colinas-León MT, López-Martínez V, Bautista-Baños S (2007) Postharvest physiology and technology of sapote mamey fruit (Pouteria sapota (Jacq.) H.E. Moore & Stearn). Postharvest Biol Technol 45:285–297

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aissa AF, Bianchi MLP, Ribeiro JC, Hernandes LC, de Faria AF, Mercadante AZ, Antunes LMG (2012) Comparative study of β-carotene and microencapsulated β-carotene: Evaluation of their genotoxic and antigenotoxic effects. Food Chem Toxicol 50:1418–1424

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. A.O.A.C. (2000) Official Methods of Analysis of A.O.A.C. International, 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists

  4. Bastías-Montes JM, Choque-Chávez MC, Alarcón-Enos J, Quevedo-León R, Muñoz-Fariña O, Vidal-San-Martín C (2019) Effect of spray drying at 150, 160, and 170 °C on the physical and chemical properties of maqui extract (Aristotelia chilensis (Molina) Stuntz). Chil J Agric Res 79:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bednarska MA, Janiszewska-Turak E (2020) The influence of spray drying parameters and carrier material on the physico-chemical properties and quality of chokeberry juice powder. J Food Sci Technol 57:564–577

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Beristain CI, Garcia HS, Vernon-Carter EJ (1999) Mesquite gum (Prosopis juliflora) and maltodextrin blends as wall materials for spray-dried encapsulated orange peel oil. Food Sci Technol Int 5:353–356

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Capelezzo AP, Mohr LC, Dalcanton F, de Mello JMM, Fiori MA (2018) β-cyclodextrins as encapsulating agents of essential oils. Cyclodext - Versatile Ingred. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.73568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carrillo-Navas H, González-Rodea DA, Cruz-Olivares J, Barrera-Pichardo JF, Román-Guerrero A, Pérez-Alonso C (2011) Storage stability and physicochemical properties of passion fruit juice microcapsules by spray-drying. Rev Mex Ing Quím 10:421–430

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen W, Rezaizadehnajafi L, Wink M (2013) Influence of resveratrol on oxidative stress resistance and life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Pharm Pharmacol 65:682–688

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Corrêa-Filho LC, Lourenço SC, Duarte DF, Moldão-Martins M, Alves VD (2019) Microencapsulation of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) pomace ethanolic extract by spray drying: optimization of process conditions. Appl Sci 9:612

  11. Corrêa-Filho LC, Lourenço MM, Moldão-Martins M, Alves VD (2019) Microencapsulation of β-carotene by spray drying: effect of wall material concentration and drying inlet temperature. Int J Food Sci 2019:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. De Marco R, Vieria AMS, Ugri MA, Monteiro A, Bergamasco R (2013) Microencapsulation of annatto seed extract: stability and application. Chem Eng Trans 32:1777–1782

    Google Scholar 

  13. Desobry SA, Netto FM, Labuza TP (1997) Comparison of spray-drying, drum-drying and freeze-drying for β-carotene encapsulation and preservation. J Food Sci 62:1158–1162

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Esmailpour AA, Zarghami R, Mostoufi N (2015) Effect of Temperature on the Nanoparticles Agglomerates Fluidization. Proc 2015 Int Conf Model Simul Appl Math. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/msam-15.2015.55

  15. Faria AF, Mignone RA, Montenegro MA, Mercadante AZ, Borsarelli CD (2010) Characterization and singlet oxygen quenching capacity of spray-dried microcapsules of edible biopolymers containing antioxidant molecules. J Agric Food Chem 58:8004–8011

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Geldart D (1973) Types of gas fluidisation. Powder Technol 7:285–292

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. González-Peña MA, Lozada-Ramírez JD, Ortega-Regules AE (2021) Influence of carotenoids of mamey (Pouteria sapota) and carrot (Daucus carota) on oxidative stress resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Manuscript submitted for publication

  18. Guerrero-Rubio MA, Hernández-García S, García-Carmona F, Gandía-Herrero F (2019) Extension of life-span using a RNAi model and in vivo antioxidant effect of Opuntia fruit extracts and pure betalains in Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Chem 274:840–847

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gul K, Tak A, Singh AK, Singh P, Yousuf B, Wani AA (2015) Chemistry, encapsulation, and health benefits of β-carotene - A review. Cogent Food Agric. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2015.1018696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hojjati M, Razavi SH, Rezaei K, Gilani K (2014) Stabilization of canthaxanthin produced by Dietzia natronolimnaea HS-1 with spray drying microencapsulation. J Food Sci Technol 51:2134–2140

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Janiszewska-Turak E (2017) Carotenoids microencapsulation by spray drying method and supercritical micronization. Food Res Int 99:891–901

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jara-Palacios MJ, González-Manzano S, Escudero-Gilete ML, Hernanz D, Dueñas M, González-Paramás AM, Heredia FJ, Santos-Buelga C (2013) Study of zalema grape pomace: phenolic composition and biological effects in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Agric Food Chem 61:5114–5121

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiménez-Aguilar DM, Ortega-Regules AE, Lozada-Ramírez JD, Pérez-Pérez MCI, Vernon-Carter EJ, Welti-Chanes J (2011) Color and chemical stability of spray-dried blueberry extract using mesquite gum as wall material. J Food Compos Anal 24:889–894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Juscamaita Fabián L, Pérez Salvatierra T, Espinoza Silva C, Quispe Solano M, Hinostroza Quiñónez G, Flores Ramos O, Manyari Cervantes G (2017) Evaluación de la estabilidad de carotenoides y actividad antioxidante de la flor de mastuerzo (Tropaeolum majus L.) en la microencapsulación por Spray-Drying. Rev Soc Quím Perú 83:282–293

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lashmanova E, Proshkina E, Zhikrivetskaya S, Shevchenko O, Marusich E, Leonov S, Melerzanov A, Zhavoronkov A, Moskalev A (2015) Fucoxanthin increases lifespan of Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans. Pharmacol Res 100:228–241

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee EB, Kim JH, Cha Y-S, Kim M, Song SB, Cha DS, Jeon H, Eun JS, Han S, Kim DK (2015) Lifespan extending and stress resistant properties of vitexin from Vigna angularis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biomol Ther 23:582–589

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lim ASL, Roos YH (2016) Spray drying of high hydrophilic solids emulsions with layered interface and trehalose-maltodextrin as glass formers for carotenoids stabilization. J Food Eng 171:174–184

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu X, Luo Q, Cao Y, Goulette T, Liu X, Xiao H (2016) Mechanism of different stereoisomeric astaxanthin in resistance to oxidative stress in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Food Sci 81:H2280–H2287

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mestry AP, Mujumdar AS, Thorat BN (2011) Optimization of spray drying of an innovative functional food: fermented mixed juice of carrot and watermelon. Dry Technol 29:1121–1131

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Montero P, Calvo MM, Gómez-Guillén MC, Gómez-Estaca J (2016) Microcapsules containing astaxanthin from shrimp waste as potential food coloring and functional ingredient: Characterization, stability, and bioaccessibility. LWT - Food Sci Technol 70:229–236

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moo-Huchin VM, Estrada-Mota I, Estrada-León R, Cuevas-Glory L, Ortiz-Vázquez E, de Vargas M, Betancur-AnconaSauri-Duch DE (2014) Determination of some physicochemical characteristics, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of tropical fruits from Yucatan, Mexico. Food Chem 152:508–515

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Murillo E, Giuffrida D, Menchaca D, Dugo P, Torre G, Meléndez-Martinez AJ, Mondello L (2013) Native carotenoids composition of some tropical fruits. Food Chem 140:825–836

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ochoa-Velasco CE, Salazar-González C, Cid-Ortega S, Guerrero-Beltrán JA (2017) Antioxidant characteristics of extracts of Hibiscus sabdariffa calyces encapsulated with mesquite gum. J Food Sci Technol 54:1747–1756

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pons E, Alquézar B, Rodríguez A, Martorell P, Genovés S, Ramón D, Rodrigo MJ, Zacarías L, Peña L (2014) Metabolic engineering of β-carotene in orange fruit increases its in vivo antioxidant properties. Plant Biotechnol J 12:17–27

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Pinto RM, Nakamura LR, Ramires TG, López Bautista EA, Dos Santos Dias CT (2016) Genotype selection of Pouteria sapota (Jacq.) H.E. Moore & Stearn, under a multivariate framework. Acta Agronómica 65:312–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Przybysz M, Szterk A, Symoniuk E, Gąszczyk M, Dłużewska E (2018) α- and β-carotene stability during storage of microspheres obtained from spray-dried microencapsulation technology. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 68:45–55

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Przybysz MA, Onacik-Gür S, Majtczak K, Dluzewska E (2016) The stability of spray-dried microencapsulated β-carotene in the mixture of gum arabic, osa-type modified starch and maltodextrin. Ital J Food Sci 28:716–732

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pu J, Bankston JD, Sathivel S (2011) Production of microencapsulated crawfish (Procambarus clarkii) astaxanthin in oil by spray drying technology. Dry Technol 29:1150–1160

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 26:1231–1237

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ren Y, Chenb S, Mengmeng M, Zhangb C, Wangb K, Lib F, Guoa W, Huangb J, Zhanga C (2017) Do ROS really slow down aging in C. elegans? Arxiv 1704.06086v2

  41. Rehman A, Tong Q, Jafari SM, Assadpour E, Shehzad Q, Aadil RM, Iqbal MW, Rashed MMA, Mushtaq BS, Ashraf W (2020) Carotenoid-loaded nanocarriers: a comprehensive review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 275:102048

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ribeiro D, Freitas M, Silva AMS, Carvalho F, Fernandes E (2018) Antioxidant and pro-oxidant activities of carotenoids and their oxidation products. Food Chem Toxicol 120:681–699

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Saini RK, Nile SH, Park SW (2015) Carotenoids from fruits and vegetables: chemistry, analysis, occurrence, bioavailability and biological activities. Food Res Int 76:735–750

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Shaaruddin S, Mahmood Z, Ismail H, Mohd Ghazali H, Hamzah MY, Muhammad K (2019) Stability of β-carotene in carrot powder and sugar confection as affected by resistant maltodextrin and octenyl succinate anhydride (OSA) starches. J Food Sci Technol 56:3461–3470

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shen Q, Quek SY (2014) Microencapsulation of astaxanthin with blends of milk protein and fiber by spray drying. J Food Eng 123:165–171

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shu B, Yu W, Zhao Y, Liu X (2006) Study on microencapsulation of lycopene by spray-drying. J Food Eng 76:664–669

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Soukoulis C, Bohn T (2018) A comprehensive overview on the micro- and nano-technological encapsulation advances for enhancing the chemical stability and bioavailability of carotenoids. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 58:1–36

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Surco-Laos F, Cabello J, Gómez-Orte E, González-Manzano S, González-Paramás AM, Santos-Buelga C, Dueñas M (2011) Effects of O-methylated metabolites of quercetin on oxidative stress, thermotolerance, lifespan and bioavailability on Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Funct 2:445

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Thakur D, Jain A, Ghoshal G, Shivhare US, Katare OP (2017) Microencapsulation of β-Carotene based on casein/guar gum blend using zeta potential-yield stress phenomenon: an approach to enhance photo-stability and retention of functionality. AAPS PharmSciTech 18:1447–1459

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Turki D, Fatah N (2008) Behavior and fluidization of the cohesive powders: agglomerates sizes approach. Braz J Chem Eng 25:697–711

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang Y, Ye H, Zhou C, Lv F, Bie X, Lu Z (2012) Study on the spray-drying encapsulation of lutein in the porous starch and gelatin mixture. Eur Food Res Technol 234:157–163

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yahia EM, Gutiérrez-Orozco F, Arvizu-de Leon C (2011) Phytochemical and antioxidant characterization of mamey (Pouteria sapota Jacq. H.E. Moore & Stearn) fruit. Food Res Int 44:2175–2181

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yazaki K, Yoshikoshi C, Oshiro S, Yanase S (2011) Supplemental cellular protection by a carotenoid extends lifespan via Ins/IGF-1 signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2011:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Yoon D, Lee M-H, Cha D (2018) Measurement of Intracellular ROS in Caenorhabditis elegans Using 2’,7’-Dichlorodihydrofluorescein Diacetate. BIO-Protoc. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.2774

  55. You JS, Jeon S, Byun YJ, Koo S, Choi SS (2015) Enhanced biological activity of carotenoids stabilized by phenyl groups. Food Chem 177:339–345

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhou KI, Pincus Z, Slack FJ (2011) Longevity and stress in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging 3:733–753

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledegments

MAGP thanks Universidad de las Américas Puebla (UDLAP) and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) for the scholarship granted to complete his doctoral degree.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MAGP performed the experiments, the literature research, data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. JDLR and AEOR designed and supervised the experiments, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Eugenia Ortega-Regules.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

González-Peña, M.A., Lozada-Ramírez, J.D. & Ortega-Regules, A.E. Antioxidant activities of spray-dried carotenoids using maltodextrin-Arabic gum as wall materials. Bull Natl Res Cent 45, 58 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-021-00515-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Spray-drying
  • Mamey
  • Carrot
  • Carotenoids
  • Antioxidant activity
  • Caenorhabditis elegans