Skip to main content

Inverted Meckel's diverticulum associated with heterotopic pancreatic tissue causing intestinal obstruction: a case report

Abstract

Background

Meckel’s diverticulum is the most frequent congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal tract. It can invert or invaginate into the small intestine lumen. It is usually associated with heterotopic tissue elements.

Case presentation

We present a case of inverted Meckel's diverticulum, clinically and radiologically diagnosed as intestinal obstruction due to intussusceptions. The diagnosis was suspected due to target sign shown on radiological examination. Pathologically, it was inverted Meckel's diverticulum obstructing the lumen in parallel plan mimicking the telescoping appearance, with heterotopic pancreatic tissue formed of exocrine and ductal components only.

Conclusions

Inverted Meckel’s diverticulum may present by vague symptoms and may simulate other causes of intestinal obstruction.

Background

Meckel’s diverticulum is the most frequent congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal tract, and it occurs in approximately 2% of the general population. It results from incomplete atrophy of the omphalomesenteric (vitelline) duct (Levy and Hobbs 2004). It can invert or invaginate into the small intestine lumen. When occurring, the mesenteric fat surrounding the Meckel’s diverticulum is pulled into the center and can progress into intussusception or bowel obstruction. These consequences could be very dangerous if they are not diagnosed and may lead to perforation, bowel necrosis, and sepsis (Levy and Hobbs 2004; Dujardin et al. 2002).

Meckel’s diverticulum complications risk varies widely from 4 to 40% (Elsayes et al. (2007); Fink et al. 1995). The most common presentation in adults is bowel obstruction (Sagar et al. 2006). Heterotopic pancreatic tissue is a congenital anomaly in which pancreatic tissue is anatomically separate from the main pancreatic gland with no vascular or duct continuity (Kung et al. 2010; Wei et al. 2011). The most frequent locations are the stomach (25.5%), duodenum (27.7%), proximal jejunum (15.9%), Meckel diverticulum (5.3%), and ileum (2.8%) (Wei et al. 2011).

Case presentation

A 16-year-old Egyptian male patient was admitted to Ahmad Maher Teaching Hospital with acute intestinal obstruction. He also had history of many similar attacks but no history of gastrointestinal bleeding. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed target sign of intestinal intussusception. Total leucocytic count was 11 × 109 /L. The patient underwent intestinal segment resection and end-to-end anastomosis 60 cm proximal to ileo-cecal valve.

The received intestinal segment was 20 cm long and 3.5 cm wide. Serosa showed a dimple continuous with sausage-shaped projection measuring 6 cm long and 3 cm thick (Fig. 1). It was parallel to the long axis of the intestine and almost occluding the lumen. Cut section is heterogeneous showing firm brown nodule near the tip measuring 0.7 cm in diameter (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

Inverted Meckel’s diverticulum protruding inside the lumen

Fig. 2
figure2

Cut section of the diverticulum showing avulsion site near the tip representing the ectopic pancreatic tissue

Microscopically, a projection was covered by full-thickness small intestinal wall with variable degrees of inflammation and surface erosions. The firm nodule near the tip was formed of aggregates of serous acini (Fig. 3) surrounded by proliferating pyloric type glands with focal goblet cells showing no atypia and embedded within muscularis propria (Fig. 4). Immunohistochemistry was done and the acini were completely negative for chromogranin (Fig. 5) and both the acini and the ducts were positive for cytokeratin (Fig. 6), so it was diagnosed as heterotopic pancreatic tissue.

Fig. 3
figure3

Pancreatic acini (semi-autolyzed-high power-H&E)

Fig. 4
figure4

Pancreatic acini and ducts (low power H&E)

Fig. 5
figure5

Negative immunostain of chromogranin (low power)

Fig. 6
figure6

Positive immunostain of pan cytokeratin (low power)

Discussion

Inverted Meckel’s diverticulum is also presented clinically by lower gastrointestinal bleeding, chronic abdominal pain, or with symptoms and signs suggestive of small bowel obstruction. The most common age group is young adults unlike usual Meckel’s diverticulum and generally presents as subacute or chronic symptoms like abdominal pain or low-grade small intestinal obstruction (Pantongrag-Brown et al. 1996).

Our patient is young adult and has similar history except for the lower gastrointestinal bleeding. The absence of bleeding is probably due to non-existing heterotopic gastric tissue, whereby approximately 90% of Meckel’s diverticula is manifested by bleeding due to contained gastric mucosa (Elsayes et al. 2007; Kusumoto et al. 1992). Another less common cause of pain and hemorrhage is acute inflammation of heterotopic pancreatic tissue (Zarand et al. 2011; Kopácová et al. 2010), but our case only showed non-inflamed heterotopic pancreas.

Preoperative ultrasonography revealed the target sign of intussusception (telescoping), when a loop of the small intestine with its mesentery invaginates into the lumen of the intestinal segment distal to it (Azar and Berger (1997)) However, the macroscopic examination showed only the inverted diverticulum inside and parallel to the intestinal wall resembling the telescoping appearance.

Pathology of the projection core showed mixed elements of fat and connective tissue representing the pulled mesentery to the center of the inverted diverticulum (Levy and Hobbs 2004; Dujardin et al. 2002). This filling of mesenteric fat is seen at the tip of the inverted sac as bulbous tip making a characteristic club-like appearance found in more than 90% of cases (Gaisie et al. (1993)). And it was also seen in our case. It may also overlap with intestinal lipoma and can be differentiated by the presence of muscularis propria layer (Araki et al. 2012).

The detected pancreatic tissue is located in muscularis propria, and this location is detected in 8% of cases (Ulrych et al. (2015)). Heterotopic pancreatic tissue could be histologically divided into the following four types: (A) those comprising all cell types (total heterotopia), (B) those composed of ducts only (canalicular heterotopia), (C) those comprising acinar cells only (exocrine heterotopia), and (D) those composed of islet cells only (endocrine heterotopia) (Gaspar-Fuentes et al. 1973). Our case showed canalicular and exocrine components. The main differential diagnosis with our case is neuroendocrine tumor which is the most commonly developed neoplasm originating from Meckel’s diverticulum (Levy and Hobbs 2004).We diagnosed pancreatic acini and excluded neuroendocrine tumor by chromogranin negativity.

Conclusions

We present a case of inverted Meckel's diverticulum, presented clinically with vague symptoms and radiologically diagnosed as intestinal obstruction due to intussusception. Pathologically, it was inverted Meckel's diverticulum with heterotopic pancreatic tissue. Usually, it is associated with heterotopic elements and should be diagnosed thoroughly.

Availability of supporting data

All material are available.

References

  1. Araki A, Tsuchiya K, Oshima S et al (2012) Endoscopic ultrasound with double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis of inverted Meckel’s diverticulum: a case report. J Med Case Rep 6:328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azar T, Berger DL (1997) Adult intussusception. Ann Surg 226:134–138

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dujardin M, de Beeck BO, Osteaux M (2002) Inverted Meckel’s diverticulum as a leading point for ileoileal intussusception in an adult: case report. Abdom Imaging 27:563–565

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elsayes KM, Menias CO, Harvin HJ et al (2007) Imaging manifestations of Meckel’s diverticulum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fink AM, Alexopoulou E, Carty H (1995) Bleeding Meckel’s diverticulum in infancy: unusual scintigraphic and ultrasound appearances. Pediatr Radiol 25:155–156

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaisie G, Kent C, Klein L et al (1993) Radiographic characteristics of isolated invaginated Meckel’s diverticulum. Pediatr Radiol 23:355–356

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaspar-Fuentes A, Campos-Tarrech JM, Fernandez-Burgui JL et al (1973) Pancreatic ectopias. Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig 39:255–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kopácová M, Vykouril L, Vacek Z et al (2010) Inverted Meckel’s diverticulum with ectopic pancreatic tissue as a source of severe gastrointestinal bleeding. J Gastrointest Surg 14:578–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kung JW, Brown A, Kruskal JB et al (2010) Heterotopic pancreas: typical and atypical imaging findings. Clin Radiol 65(5):403–407

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kusumoto H, Yoshida M, Takahashi I et al (1992) Complications and diagnosis of Meckel’s diverticulum in 776 patients. Am J Surg 164:382–383

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Levy AD, Hobbs CM (2004) From the archives of the AFIP. Meckel diverticulum: radiologic features with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 24:565–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pantongrag-Brown L, Levine MS, Buetow PC et al (1996) Meckel’s enteroliths: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:1447–1450

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sagar J, Kumar V, Shah DK (2006) Meckel’s diverticulum: a systematic review. J R Soc Med 99:501–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ulrych J, Fryba V, Skalova H et al (2015) Premalignant and malignant lesions of the heterotopic pancreas in the esophagus: a case report and review of the literature. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 24(2):235–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wei R, Wang QB, Chen QH et al (2011) Upper gastrointestinal tract heterotopic pancreas: findings from CT and endoscopic imaging with histopathologic correlation. Clin Imaging 35(5):353–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zarand A, Bajtai A, Baranyai Z et al (2011) Inflammation of ectopic pancreatic tissue in a Meckel’s diverticulum causing acute abdominal symptoms: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Pathol 19:359–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the colleagues and technicians for supporting and facilitating this work and would like to thank reviewers for their in-depth comments that improved the manuscript.

Funding

The authors did not receive any financial support from anybody.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MK described the macroscopic specimen and wrote the manuscript. HB recommended the manuscript and the immunohistochemistry panel. ST and EM participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud Kamel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Human tissue, approved by Ahmed Maher teaching hospital.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent to publish this information was obtained from the parent.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or nonfinancial competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamel, M., Barsoum, H., Talaat, S. et al. Inverted Meckel's diverticulum associated with heterotopic pancreatic tissue causing intestinal obstruction: a case report. Bull Natl Res Cent 45, 23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-021-00488-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Meckel’s diverticulum
  • Inverted Meckel
  • Heterotopic pancreas
  • Intestinal obstruction
\