Skip to main content
Bulletin of the National Research Centre
Bulletin of the National Research Centre Cover Image
Download PDF

Precipitation pattern changes and response of vegetation to drought variability in the eastern Hungary

Bulletin of the National Research Centre volume 44, Article number: 55 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Recently, many parts of Hungary, as well as central Europe, have been hit by successive extreme climatic events. The main aim of this research was to analyze hydrological and agricultural drought episodes in the Debrecen Region in eastern Hungary from 1950 to 2010. Thus, data of monthly precipitation were collected and tested. After that, three indices were applied, the Precipitation Concentration Index (PCI), dry Precipitation Concentration Index (dPCI), and the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). Meanwhile, the correlation between SPI and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was calculated.

Results

The results showed that the PCI values ranged between 9.44 and 15.8 with an average of 11.8, while the dPCI values ranged between 8.6 and 20.7 with an average of 10.9, which indicates heterogeneity in rainfall distribution from year to year. More than 103 events of severe agricultural drought were detected for the whole studied period. In connection to this, severe hydrological drought was recorded in 16% of the total monthly rainfall events from 1950 to 2010. Interestingly, a significant correlation was obtained between SPI-3, -6 (i.e., drought), and NDVI in the summer season.

Conclusions

The SPI index could provide an easy tool for drought monitoring meanwhile drought evaluation and monitoring should be taken seriously in the central Europe.

Introduction

Climate change in the current decades is one of the major threats of human food security all over the world; where its consequences affect millions of people every year (Tirado et al. 2010; Mohammed and Fallah 2019; Mohammed et al. 2019a). Generally, climate change events can be divided into two major groups: the first one needs a long period to be noticed, where it developed in silence as drought (Mukherjee et al. 2018). While the second group developed suddenly and created a big mass in the ecosystem such as flash flood (Lehner et al. 2006). Among climate change indicators, drought is considered to be one of the most current phenomena which started to hit new places (countries and regions), that used to be rarely subjected to droughts such as Europe and many other parts of the world (Sepulcre-Canto et al. 2012). So far, many drought indices had been developed such as the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) (Palmer 1965); Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) (McKee et al. (1993, 1995), Crop Moisture Index (CMI) (Palmer 1968); Standardized Runoff Index (SRI) (Shukla and Wood 2008), Drought Severity Index (DSI) and many others for different reasons. Within this context, PDSI and SPI used for meteorological drought monitoring, CMI for agricultural drought, SRI for hydrological drought, and DSI for regional drought (Narasimhan and Srinivasan 2005; Dai 2011; Mukherjee et al. 2018). However, SPI is one of the common indices for detecting drought on a different scale (i.e., 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months); which is widely used in many countries such as Romania (Ionita et al. 2016); Ethiopia (El Kenawy et al. 2016); Italy (Bonaccorso et al. 2015); Syria (Mohammed et al. 2019b), India (Dutta et al. 2015), Poland (Łabędzki 2007); China (Zhang et al. 2009), Hungary (Mohammed and Harsányi 2019); Greece (Livada and Assimakopoulos 2007); USA (Hayes et al. 1999), and many other parts of the world.

For Hungary, some research can be found in sub-regional levels for detecting drought trends and analysis. Makra et al. (2002) analyzed climatic data for the eastern part of Hungary and concluded that the period between 1901 and 1940 was wet, while the rest of the years until the 1990s were found to be significantly drier. Similarly, Szép et al. (2005) reported that soil conditions became drier during the twentieth century. On the national scale, Szinell et al. (1998) detected an existing general drying tendency in Hungary. Alsafadi et al. (2020) reported a significant increase (P < 0.05) of the area affected by very extreme drought in Hungary between 1960-2010. Bartholy et al. (2013) predicted significant drought in Hungary for the period 2071–2100, due to the significant decrease of rainfall in the summer compared to 1961–1990 as a reference period

Even though many studies had been conducted lately to analyze drought in Hungary, few studies deal with drought on the sub-regional scale. Thus, the main aim of this study is to analyze hydrological and agricultural drought episodes in the Debrecen Region in Hungary from 1950 to 2010.

Material and methods

Study area

Our study area—Debrecen Region—is located in the eastern part of Hungary (47.5N, 21.5E), 100–150 m above sea level (Fig. 1). This region has a continental climate where the winter is cold (mean temperature in January is − 2°) and the summer is warm (21 °C in July). The mean annual temperature is 10.5 °C, while the yearly average rainfall is 560 mm. The Western part (from N to SE) of the surroundings of the town Debrecen is dominated by chernozem soil with excellent water management characteristics and fertility. East to Debrecen (from N to SE), sandy soils are typical with large drought sensitivity and reduced fertility.

Fig. 1
figure1

Location of Debrecen Region in Hungary

Full size image

Meteorological database and drought analysis

Our research was based on the 60-year-long (1951–2010) monthly precipitation dataset of Debrecen Meteorological Station (Hungarian Meteorological Service). As a first step, primary statistical analysis for each year was conducted which include mean, standard deviation, skewness, and many other tests.

To track drought episodes within the study area, three indices were used: the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) (McKee et al. 1993), Precipitation Concentration Index (PCI), and the dry Precipitation Concentration Index (dPCI) (supra-seasonal scale) (Oliver 1980).

The PCI and dPCI are typically used as an indicator of rainfall pattern and erosivity. Values of PCI were calculated for each year, and the dPCI was calculated from April to September for monitoring changes in the rainfall pattern, which highly affected agricultural production.

The PCI can be calculated using the following equation:

$$ \mathrm{PCI}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{12}{p}_i^2}{{\left({\sum}_{i=1}^{12}{p}_i\right)}^2}\ast 100 $$
(1)

where pi is monthly precipitation of any month i.

Also, the dPCI can be calculated for 6 months from April until August as follows:

$$ \mathrm{dPCI}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^6{p}_i^2}{{\left({\sum}_{i=1}^6{p}_i\right)}^2}\ast 50 $$
(2)

Classification of PCI and dPCI can be seen in Table 1.

Table 1 The PCI and dPCI range and classification
Full size table

In the next step, trend of rainfall (R), PCI, and dPCI were analyzed by applying the Cramer-von Mises test (CM). In our study, we adapted the CM for trend analysis; where the determination of trend depends on the p value. If P value > α (i.e., 0.05) → Ha is rejected. However, if P value < α → Ha is accepted, and if P value = 0 → test was failed. However, the CM can be calculated for variables x1,…xN, for a specific continuous distribution f(x) as follows:

$$ {\omega}^2={\int}_{-\infty}^{\infty }{\left[{f}_N(x)-f(x)\right]}^2 df(x) $$
(3)

For discrete data we use

$$ {\omega}^2=\frac{1}{12n}+{\sum}_{i=1}^n{\left(\frac{2i-1}{2n}-F\left({x}_i\right)\right)}^2 $$
(4)

where fN(x) was defined as empirical distribution function.

Also, we applied the SPI as a worldwide index used for drought monitoring (Park et al. 2019), which can be calculated by using the SPI software recommended by the WMO https://drought.unl.edu/droughtmonitoring/SPI/SPIProgram.aspx as follows:

$$ \mathrm{SPI}=\frac{X_{ij}-{X}_{im}}{\sigma } $$
(5)

where Xij is the seasonal precipitation; Xim is the mean of long-term period; and σ is the standard deviation. For drought study, SPI values can be categorized into moderate drought (− 1.49 to − 1), severe drought (− 1.99 to − 1.5), and extreme drought (SPI < − 2). Usually, SPI is calculated for different scales (i.e., 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36 months).

In a final step, the smoothing technique was used for detecting the trend of SPIs by using polynomial regression and weights, computed from Gaussian density function adopted from the SigmaPlot program.

Drought impact on vegetation greening

For tracking the impact of drought variability on vegetation greening, we analyzed the correlation between SPI (drought) and NDVI (land cover sensitivity to SPI variation). The SPI data for 3 and 6 months were collected from the Climate of the Carpathian region project-CARPATCLIM, where data of 72 gridded points over the county was employed, this dataset at spatial resolution 10 km × 10 km (CARPATCLIM 2019; Szalai et al. 2013). All records of semi-monthly NDVI dataset from the NOAA-AVHRR satellite (i.e., recognized NDVI datasets) were collected from the Global Inventory Modelling and Mapping Studies GIMMS3g. (https://ecocast.arc.nasa.gov/data/pub/gimms/3g.v1/). The GIMMS3g is one of the globally NDVI datasets which widely used (Vicente-Serrano et al. 2019). The quality of this data assured carefully through consideration of the effects of atmospheric, cloud cover and other quality control linked by sensor and satellite, e.g., solar and viewing angle due to satellite drift (Tucker et al. 2005; Pinzon and Tucker 2014). Ultimately, results were converted by using Geographic Information System (GIS) while maintaining the same original spatial resolution.

Results

Trends of R, PCI, and dPCI in the study area from 1951 until 2010

Tracking rainfall changes in the study area showed that the maximum rainfall reached 953 mm while the minimum was 321 mm (Fig. 2), and the average rainfall for the whole time series was 561 mm.

Fig. 2
figure2

Yearly rainfall changes in the studied area from 1950 to 2010

Full size image

On a monthly scale, the average rainfall ranged from 30 mm (March) to 64mm (June); the minimum rainfall ranged between 0 mm (September) and 19 mm (June); however, the maximum rainfall was recorded in August with 232 mm (Table 2). The statistical analysis also showed also that the variation coefficient ranges from 49 to 88%, while Skewness ranges from 0.35 to 1.73 and Kurtosis reaches 6.2 as can be seen in Table 2 and Fig. 3. These results indicate the presence of extreme events in the study area as proposed by (Aladaileh et al. 2019).

Table 2 The statistical analysis for monthly rainfall from 1951 to 2010
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure3

Boxplot analysis of monthly rainfall from 1950 to 2010

Full size image

The PCI values ranged between 9.4 and 15.8 with an average of 11.8, while the dPCI values range between 8.6 and 20.7 with an average 10.9 (Fig. 4). These results indicate a seasonality in rainfall distribution with changes from year to year. Table 3 showed a positive but not significant trend for R, PCI and a positive significant trend for dPCI, which emphasizes the fact that most of the rainfall had irregular distribution within a year.

Fig. 4
figure4

Trends of PCI and dPCI in the study area

Full size image
Table 3 The CM Trend for R, PCI and dPCI in the study area from 1951 till 2010
Full size table

SPI variability from 1951 to 2010

Drought analysis showed that more than 103 events of severe agricultural drought (SPI-1, SPI-3, SPI-6) were detected for the whole studied period (Table 4).

Table 4 Distribution of Agricultural drought events from 1951 till 2010
Full size table

In connection with this, severe hydrological drought (SPI-9, SPI-12, SPI-24, SPI-36) was recorded in 16% of the total rainfall events from 1950 to 2010 as can be seen in Table 5.

Table 5 Distribution of Hydrological drought events from 1951 till 2010
Full size table

For the SPI-6, as a representative of agricultural drought, we can highlight the years of 1962, 1974, 1976, 1990; 1992, 2000, and 2007 as the most affected years by drought, where the agricultural production was badly affected. In a similar vein, hydrological drought for SPI-36 was distinguished in 1961–1965, 1973–1974, and 1992–1995, where recharge of natural bodies was affected by severe drought. However, regardless the drought time scale, the periods of 1962–1964, 1968, 1971–1974, 1986–1987, 1990, 1992–1995, and 2006–2007 can be selected as the most affected years by different types of drought as can be seen in Figs. 5 and 6.

Fig. 5
figure5

SPI variability from 1951 to 2010

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure6

SPI trends of the study area in different time scale by using smoothing technique

Full size image

Correlation matrix between SPI (-3, -6) and NDVI

The NDVI was used as an indicator of vegetation cover. The NDVI ranges between − 1 and 1 where − 1 indicate poor vegetation cover while + 1 indicate good vegetation cover. In return, we choose SPI-3 and SPI-6 as an indicator of agricultural drought. In other words, high correlation between SPI and NDVI revel to drought conditions in the study area. Figures 7 and 8 depict the correlation matrix between both choose SPI (-3, -6) and NDVI. Results showed a significant correlation between studied indices in summer and early fall, which could be explained by decreasing of vegetation cover as well as increasing drought level in the study area. The highest correlation was recorded on August, September, and October.

Fig. 7
figure7

Spatial-temporal correlation between monthly SPI-3-time scale and NDVI during the period of 1981 to 2010, the dots indicate a statistically significant correlation at 95% confidence level (P < 0.05)

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure8

Spatial-temporal correlation between monthly SPI-6-time scale and NDVI during the period of 1981 to 2010, the dots indicate to a statistically significant correlation at 95% confidence level (P < 0.05)

Full size image

Discussion

The smoothing technique analysis emphasised the previous results where the Debrecen Region was subjected to drought in two distinguished periods, the first of which was between 1960 and 1970, while the second one between 1990 and 2000. However, the trend of SPI-1, SPI-3, and SPI-6 showed a positive trend for the whole time series, while a negative trend was detected for SPI-9, SPI-12, SPI-24, and SPI-36 which indicate the tendency to drought in a large time scale (Fig. 6).

Generally, SPI and dPCI use only monthly rainfall data. Thus, any changes in rainfall potentially affect the results of both indices. In the dPCI cases, our results showed a moderate precipitation distribution (Fig. 4), while the SPI results indicate two periods from 1960 to 1970, and from 1990 to 2000 as most affected years by drought. Many researchers argued that rainfall data cannot be sufficient to track drought where more climate elements such as temperature and evapotranspiration should be taken into consideration. However, rainfall in Hungary was affected by different types of circulation (Cwsw, Cse, Cwnw), which have a negative trend as well as rainfall amount (Maheras et al. 2018). In connection with this, our results support this idea where an increased frequency of hydrological drought was detected (Fig. 5) with a remarkable decrease of rainfall between 1985 and 2000 (Fig. 2). Interestingly, Maheras et al. (2018) concluded that Debrecen (part of the Debrecen Region) was more subjected to extreme events (rainfall) which is consistent with our results in Table 2.

Generally, the highest portion of agricultural land is cultivated by maize followed by wheat and other crops (Széles et al. 2012), where the common agricultural system is rainfed system. Thus, any changes of rainfall patterns could have a bad impact on crop productivity. Interestingly, Adrienn and Janos (2012) reported that drought (i.e., agricultural drought) was the main reason of yield reduction in Hungary.

Yet, to our knowledge, few studies were conducted to measure the effect of drought on ecosystems, Móricz et al. (2018) indicate that the severe drought in last decades (1992–1993, 2000–2003, and 2011–2012) badly affected the Black pine growing in southwest Hungary. Similarly, Gulácsi and Kovács (2018) highlighted those years (2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003) as dry years in Danube-Tisza intersection (central of Hungary). These results are in conformity with our research as can be seen in Figs. 5 and 6.

Conclusion

This present study helps to track drought episodes in an important agricultural region in Hungary where the economic damages of severe drought in the Hungarian agricultural sector reach 145 million USD annually. The key funding of this research can be summarized as follows:

  1. 1.

    The PCI values ranged between 9.4 and 15.8 with an average of 11.8, while the dPCI values range between 8.6 and 20.7 with an average 10.9.

  2. 2.

    The most affected years by agricultural drought (i.e., SPI 6) were 1962, 1974, 1976, 1990; 1992, 2000, and 2007.

  3. 3.

    The most affected years by Hydrological drought (i.e., SPI-36) were 1961–1965, 1973–1974, and 1992–1995.

  4. 4.

    A notable significant correlation between SPI (-3, -6) and NDVI in summer and early fall was detected.

To sum up, the SPI index could provide an easy tool for drought monitoring in the study area. Successive steps should be taken on a national scale for drought monitoring and detecting by integrating different data sources such as remote sensing and other climatic data.

Availability of data and materials

The climatic dataset including precipitation can be obtained from the Hungarian Meteorological Service, SPI from Climate of the Carpathian Region project-CARPATCLIM, and NDVI dataset from the GIMMS3g.

Abbreviations

PCI:

Precipitation Concentration Index

dPCI:

Dry Precipitation Concentration Index

SPI:

Standardized Precipitation Index

PDSI:

Palmer Drought Severity Index

CMI:

Crop Moisture Index

SRI:

Standardized Runoff Index

DSI:

Drought Severity Index

NDVI:

Normalized difference vegetation index

p i :

Monthly precipitation of any month i

References

  1. Adrienn VS, Janos N (2012) Effects of nutrition and water supply on the yield and grain protein content of maize hybrids. Australian Journal of Crop Science 6(3):381

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aladaileh H, Al Qinna M, Karoly B, Al-Karablieh E, Rakonczai J (2019) An Investigation into the Spatial and Temporal Variability of the Meteorological Drought in Jordan. Climate 7(6):82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alsafadi K, Mohammed SA, Ayugi B, Sharaf M, Harsányi E (2020) Spatial–Temporal Evolution of Drought Characteristics Over Hungary Between 1961 and 2010. Pure and Applied Geophysics:1–18 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02449-5

  4. Bartholy J, Pongrácz R, Hollósi B (2013) Analysis of projected drought hazards for Hungary. Advances in Geosciences 35:61–66

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonaccorso B, Cancelliere A, Rossi G (2015) Probabilistic forecasting of drought class transitions in Sicily (Italy) using standardized precipitation index and North Atlantic oscillation index. Journal of Hydrology 526:136–150

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CARPATCLIM. (2019). Climate of the Carpathian region project. http://www.carpatclim-eu.org/pages/about/. Accessed Oct 2019.

  7. Dai A (2011) Drought under global warming: a review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change 2(1):45–65

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dutta D, Kundu A, Patel NR, Saha SK, Siddiqui AR (2015) Assessment of agricultural drought in Rajasthan (India) using remote sensing derived Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) and Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science 18(1):53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. El Kenawy AM, McCabe MF, Vicente-Serrano SM, López-Moreno JI, Robaa SM (2016) Changes in the frequency and severity of hydrological droughts over Ethiopia from 1960 to 2013. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica 42(1):145–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gulácsi A, Kovács F (2018) Drought monitoring of forest vegetation using MODIS-based normalized difference drought index in Hungary. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 67(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayes MJ, Svoboda MD, Wiihite DA, Vanyarkho OV (1999) Monitoring the 1996 drought using the standardized precipitation index. Bulletin of the American meteorological society 80(3):429–438

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ionita M, Scholz P, Chelcea S (2016) Assessment of droughts in Romania using the Standardized Precipitation Index. Natural Hazards 81(3):1483–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Łabędzki L (2007) Estimation of local drought frequency in central Poland using the standardized precipitation index SPI. Irrigation and Drainage: The journal of the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage 56(1):67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lehner B, Döll P, Alcamo J, Henrichs T, Kaspar F (2006) Estimating the impact of global change on flood and drought risks in Europe: a continental, integrated analysis. Climatic Change 75(3):273–299

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Livada I, Assimakopoulos VD (2007) Spatial and temporal analysis of drought in Greece using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). Theoretical and applied climatology 89(3-4):143–153

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maheras P, Tolika K, Anagnostopoulou C, Makra L, Szpirosz K, Károssy C (2018) Relationship between mean and extreme precipitation and circulation types over Hungary. International Journal of Climatology 38(12):4518–4532

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Makra L, Horváth S, Pongrácz R, Mika J (2002) Long term climate deviations: an alternative approach and application on the Palmer drought severity index in Hungary. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 27(23-24):1063–1071

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McKee TB, Doeskin NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. Proc. 8th Conf. on Applied Climatology, January 17-22, 1993. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 179–184

    Google Scholar 

  19. McKee TB, Doeskin NJ, Kleist J (1995) Drought monitoring with multiple time ccales. Proc. 9th Conf. on Applied Climatology, January 15-20, 1995. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 233–236

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mohammed S, Alsafadi K, Mousavi N (2019a) Drought trends in Syria from 1900 to 2015. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Developing Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Tourism of Iran, Tabriz Islamic Art University In cooperation with Shiraz University and Yasouj University, Tabriz, Iran (Vol. 14)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mohammed S, Alsafadi K, Takács I, Harsányi E (2019b) Contemporary changes of greenhouse gases emission from the agricultural sector in the EU-27. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes:1–6

  22. Mohammed SA, Fallah RQ (2019) Climate change indicators in Alsheikh-Badr Basin (Syria). Geography, Environment, Sustainability 12(2):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohammed SA, Harsányi E (2019) Drought cycle tracking in Hungary using Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). Acta Agraria Debreceniensis 2:97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Móricz N, Garamszegi B, Rasztovits E, Bidló A, Horváth A, Jagicza A et al (2018) Recent drought-induced vitality decline of Black Pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) in South-West Hungary—Is This Drought-Resistant Species under Threat by Climate Change? Forests 9(7):414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mukherjee S, Mishra A, Trenberth KE (2018) Climate change and drought: a perspective on drought indices. Current Climate Change Reports 4:145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Narasimhan B, Srinivasan R (2005) Development and evaluation of Soil Moisture Deficit Index (SMDI) and Evapotranspiration Deficit Index (ETDI) for agricultural drought monitoring. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 133(1-4):69–88

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Oliver JE (1980) Monthly precipitation distribution: a comparative index. Prof. Geogr. 32:300–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Palmer WC (1965) Meteorological drought. Research Paper 45. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, p 58

  29. Palmer WC (1968) Keeping track of crop moisture conditions, nationwide: the new crop moisture index. Weatherwise 21(4):156–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Park J, Sung JH, Lim YJ, Kang HS (2019) Introduction and application of non-stationary standardized precipitation index considering probability distribution function and return period. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 136(1-2):529–542

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pinzon JE, Tucker CJ (2014) A Non-Stationary 1981-2012 AVHRR NDVI3g Time Series. Remote Sensing 6(8):6929–6960. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6086929

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sepulcre-Canto G, Horion SMAF, Singleton A, Carrao H, Vogt J (2012) Development of a combined drought indicator to detect agricultural drought in Europe. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 12(11):3519–3531

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shukla S, Wood AW (2008) Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought. Geophysical research letters 35(2)

  34. Szalai, S., Auer, I., Hiebl, J., Milkovich, J., Radim, T., Stepanek, P., & Limanowka, D. (2013). Climate of the greater carpathian region. Final Technical Report. http://www.carpatclim-eu.org.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Széles AV, Megyes A, Nagy J (2012) Irrigation and nitrogen effects on the leaf chlorophyll content and grain yield of maize in different crop years. Agricultural Water Management 107:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Szép IJ, Mika J, Dunkel Z (2005) Palmer drought severity index as soil moisture indicator: physical interpretation, statistical behaviour and relation to global climate. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts a/B/C 30(1-3):231–243

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Szinell CS, Bussay A, Szentimrey T (1998) Drought tendencies in Hungary. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 18(13):1479–1491

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tirado MC, Clarke R, Jaykus LA, McQuatters-Gollop A, Frank JM (2010) Climate change and food safety: A review. Food Research International 43(7):1745–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tucker CJ, Pinzon JE, Brown ME, Slayback DA, Pak EW, Mahoney R, Vermote EF, El Saleous N (2005) An Extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI Dataset Compatible with MODIS and SPOT Vegetation NDVI Data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26(20):4485–4498

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vicente-Serrano NM-H, Reig F, Azorin-Molina C, Zabalza J, Beguería S, Domínguez-Castro F, El Kenawy A, Peña-Gallardo M, Noguera I, García M (2019) Vegetation greening in Spain detected from long term data (1981–2015). International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1674460

  41. Zhang Q, Xu CY, Zhang Z (2009) Observed changes of drought/wetness episodes in the Pearl River basin, China, using the standardized precipitation index and aridity index. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 98(1-2):89–99

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Higher Education Institutional Excellence Programme of the Ministry of Human Capacities in Hungary, within the framework of the 4.thematic programme of the University of Debrecen, and the projects “GINOP-2.2.1-15-2016-00001-Developing a scale independent complex precision consultancy system” and “EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00008” for unlimited support. Sincerely thanks also go to Mr. Gyula Vasvár for his technical support. The authors expresse their sincere thanks to the anonymous reviewers, and the editor for their valuablecomments, and suggestions.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Land Use, Technology and Regional Development, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

    Safwan Mohammed, Béla Gombos & Endre Harsányi

  2. Department of Geography and GIS, Faculty of Arts, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

    Karam Alsafadi

  3. Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics, Tishreen University, Lattakia, Syria

    Hasan Daher & Suliman Mahmood

Authors
  1. Safwan Mohammed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karam Alsafadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hasan Daher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Béla Gombos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Suliman Mahmood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Endre Harsányi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, data curation, writing—original draft preparation—SM; data analysis and visualization—SM, KA, HD; writing—review and Editing—HD, KA, BG, SM; Supervision—EH. All author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Safwan Mohammed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammed, S., Alsafadi, K., Daher, H. et al. Precipitation pattern changes and response of vegetation to drought variability in the eastern Hungary. Bull Natl Res Cent 44, 55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-020-00306-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • NDVI
  • SPI
  • PCI
  • Natural hazard
  • Central Europe