Skip to main content

Geochemical characteristics of agricultural soils, Assiut governorate, Egypt



The geochemical investigation of agricultural soil is a great demand because of its help in the characterization of soil and its suitability for cultivation. The urbanization, cultivation, and industrial activities at Assiut Governorate have adversely impacted the chemical composition of soil, especially its content of heavy metals. The study area includes El-Madabgh sewage station and many big industries; cement, fertilizers, and pharmaceutical.


The Nile Valley soils are very comparable in composition and composed mainly of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, and TiO2 which represent about 88% of its chemical composition. The chemical composition gave an indication about the mineralogical assemblage of soil; quartz, clay minerals, and calcite. The results pointed to the mixed source (geogenic and anthropogenic) of Fe, Co, Cu, Ni, Zn, Zr, and Cr and the anthropogenic source of As, Pb, and Cd (especially phosphatic fertilizers) in the studied soil.


The studied soil chemistry affected mainly by the agricultural practices (application of fertilizers, pesticides, manure, and wastewater irrigation), industrial inputs, and atmospheric deposition. Generally, the Egyptian soil needs more geochemical studies to monitor its quality and enhance of its productivity.


Soil is a complex heterogeneous mixture of organic and inorganic matter, as well as different components that determine its physical, chemical, and biological properties. There are 12 major and minor elements (Si, Al, O, Ca, Fe, K, Ti, Mg, Mn, Na, Cr, Ni) representing about 99.4% of its total composition and at least 68 trace elements account for the rest. However, local or regional geochemistry plays an important role in the soil composition (Galinha et al. 2010). The major elements generally occur in minerals, so can be used as a tool of discriminating element-mineral associations (Liu et al. 2001 and Salman 2008). The Al, K, Na, and Mg elements are expected to be dominantly contained in Al-silicates such as various clay minerals, chlorite, micas, and feldspars, whereas the other elements can occur in non-Al-bearing mineral phases (Salman 2013).

Soil chemical composition is controlled mainly by lithogenic and pedogenic weathering. The Egyptian soil chemistry is mainly related to the chemistry of parent rocks (mafic/ultramafic rocks) in the Ethiopian highlands. The Nile Valley sediments contains about 53.4%, 16.5%, 11.8%, 3.7%, 2.5%,1.1%, 121 ppm, 152 ppm, 114 ppm, and 178 ppm of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, TiO2, Cr, Ni, Cu, and Zn, respectively (Omer 1996). Iron (Fe) content in alluvial soils at El-Saff reached 16.6% in the surface deposit which irrigated with liquid industrial wastes (Rabie and Abd El-Sabour 1999) and Ni recorded 55.3 ppm in alluvial soils at El-Fayoum (El-Sayed and Hegazy 1993). Mohamed et al. (2013) pointed out the overload of dust fall with about 3.30, 26.46, 22.33, 235.00, 4.53, and 3.80 ppm of As, Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, and Hg; respectively around Assiut Fertilizer Plant. Elgharably et al. (2014) stated that soils at Assiut are polluted with Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, Cd, and Ni as a result of the application of sewage wastewater for irrigation.

Nowadays, pollution is considered as one of the main grave problems in the world, because the pollutants are potentially hazardous to human and animal life. The industrial practices may be causing redistribution of some hazardous elements in the environment; air, water, and surface soil. Some of these elements are vital, whereas others are toxic metals (Samuding et al. 2009). Thus, the industrial zones are probably the majority significant source of soil and plant contamination with heavy metals (Mohamed et al. 2015). Thus, the content and type of these metals depend on the nature of industrial activities.

Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the geochemical characters of the soil in the studied area. In addition, indicating the source of the heavy metals into the soil and try to give some recommendations to improve its nature.

Materials and methods

The study area

Assiut is located between latitudes 26° 50′ and 27° 40′ N and longitudes 30° 40′ and 31° 32′ E which borders at the River Nile on both eastern and western sides and the cultivated soil extends along the two banks of the Nile Valley (Fig. 1). It comprises part of the Nile Valley and parts of the surrounding plateaus. Assiut Governorate contains many big industries, such as cement chemical, fertilizers, detergents, and food. The study area includes mainly the relative wide stretch extending to the west of the Nile River.

Fig. 1

Location map of the studied soil samples

Many authors studied the geology (Fig. 2) and structural geology of the area (Said 1962; Said 1981; Omer 1996; Osman 1980; Khalifa et al. 2004). The area of study is distinguished into the following three main geomorphic units:

  • The young alluvial plain (Holocene silty clay): it represents the cultivated lands bordering the western side of the Nile. It is dissected by irrigation canals and drains running from south to north parallel to the River Nile. The cultivated lands to the west of the River Nile in Assiut are generally much wider than those lands to the east.

  • The old alluvial plain (Quaternary sand and gravel): it is represented by terraces with various elevations between the calcareous plateau and the young alluvial plain. It contains some elongated sand dunes which cover the eastern areas of the scarp of the carbonate plateau. It takes mainly the northwest-southeast direction and threats the cultivated lands of the alluvial plains. The old terraces cover a considerable area and formed mainly of travertine conglomerate with gravel, sandstone, and clay.

  • The calcareous plateau: The eastern slope of the western calcareous plateau in the area of study represents the eastern fringes of the Nile Valley. It has an elevation higher than floodplain varies from south to the north respectively. It is built of Eocene limestone covered by drift sands, flints, and the boulder of carbonate. The surface is formed into gravelly plains of black to dark brown color occupying areas of the surface.

Fig. 2

Lithologic map of the studied Assuit area (after Conoco 1987)

Sampling and analyses

Sixteen soil samples (30 cm depth) were collected around the industrial activities in the study area, which is represented the young alluvial plain. The XRF analysis was used to determine the main and trace elements in the studied soils in order to reveal the geogentic and anthropogenic enrichments of elements nearby the industrial activities.

The XRF analysis was made by using Axios Sequential WD_XRF Spectrometer, Analytical 2005 in the National Research Center laboratories. ASTM E1621 standard guide was used for elemental analysis by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer and ASTM D7348 standard test methods for loss on ignition (LOI) of solid combustion. The samples were ground to < 63 μm in diameter.


Generally, the Nile Valley soils are very comparable in composition, since they are created from the same sources of weathered sedimentary and magmatic rocks. However, resulting of the anthropogenic input, the percentage of exact trace elements can change obviously depending on the land utilize (cultivated, urban, or industrial).

The average concentration of the major oxides (wt%) in the studied soils are 50.06, 13.58, 12.01, 6.44, 2.65, 1.83, 1.3, 0.82, 0.69, 0.52, and 0.09 for SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, TiO2, K2O, Na2O, P2O5, SO3, and Cl; respectively, as well as LOI = 9.55 (Table 1). The average levels of trace elements in the studied area are as follows in decreasing order: Mn, Zr, Zn, Cr, Ni, Pb, Co, Cu, As, and Cd are ~ 1181, ~ 266, ~ 119, ~ 117, ~ 84, ~ 38, ~ 35, ~ 32, 15.41, and 1.37 ppm, respectively (Table 2).

Table 1 Major oxides contents and LOI in the studied soil samples (%)
Table 2 Heavy metals (ppm) contents in the studied agriculture soil


The major elements

The major element oxides generally occur in minerals. Thus, major oxides analysis is useful as a tool for discriminating element-mineral associations (Liu et al. 2001 and Salman 2008). Abou El-Anwar et al. (2018) stated that Assiut soil is composed mainly of quartz, anorthite, calcined albite, calcite, montmorillonite, vermiculite, and illite mineral assemblages. Melegy and El-Agami (2004) stated that the mineralogical composition of soil at Bahtim, Egypt is mainly quartz, plagioclase, amphibole, smectite, kaolinite, and illite. Also, Salman (2013) mentioned that Sohag soils are mainly composed of quartz, feldspars, calcite, montmorillonite, and kaolinite. Al, K, Na, and Mg elements are expected to be dominantly contained in Al-silicate minerals; clay minerals, chlorite, micas, and feldspars, while the other elements can also occur in the non-silicate mineral phases (Van der Veer 2006).

High SiO2 content in the studied soils is possibly due to the abundance of quartz (Hussein et al. 2004 and Salman 2008) in agreement with the mineralogical studied for the same studied samples with Abou El-Anwar et al. (2018). This is supported by the strong significant positive correlation between SiO2 and sand content (r = 0.77) as well as negative correlation (− 0.81) between SiO2 and Al2O3 (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation matrix of the major oxides in the studied agricultural soils

To further investigate the role of Al-minerals for the distribution of different major elements, a simple linear regression analysis was performed (Table 3). The results of this regression indicate that the concentrations of K, Fe, Ti, and Mg are primarily related to Al, and as such, these elements are dominantly controlled by clay minerals and/or by minerals associated with clays during sedimentation. Sample No. 10 recorded the highest percentages of Al2O3, Fe2O3, and TiO2 (16.26, 15.51, and 2.48%; respectively Table 1) which referred to the abundance of vermiculite mineral, its agreements with the mineralogical studies Abou El-Anwar et al. (2018).

Iron (Fe2O3) content ranges from 4.58 to 15.52% and averages 12.01%, which is strongly higher than that of the values UUC (5.04%) recorded by Rudnick and Gao (2014). Thus, the enrichment of iron in the studied soils may be strongly controlled by the source rock composition, where they are derived principally from the Ethiopian basaltic plateau (Omer 1996; Abou El-Anwar and Samy 2013; Abou El-Anwar et al. 2018). Fe2O3 is positively correlated with silt and clay content (r = 0.64 and 0.57; respectively), and not correlated with carbonate content (r = 0.09). Thus, the unusually high concentration of Fe2O3 recorded in most samples might be attributed to effluents from Seed Pharmaceutical, Mangabad factories, sewage station in the studied area.

Fe2O3 is strongly to medium correlated with Al2O3, TiO2, MgO, NaO, and K2O (r = 0.96, 0.95, 0.85, 0.67, and 0.44; respectively) (Table 3). This indicates that montmorillonite is the main bearer for Fe (Al-Gamal 2011; Salman 2013; Abou El-Anwar et al. 2018). The high concentration of Fe2O3 may be attributed to the presence of other iron-bearing phases in the soil such as ferromagnesian minerals (amphibolies and pyroxene), iron oxides (magnetite and hematite), and chlorite. Where Sohag soil contains a significant amount of chlorite (Bekir 1997). The high average percentage of iron content (12.01%) may be reacted with the montmorillonite in suitable media and produced the vermiculite (Mg, Fe, Al-silicate) which is in agreement with the mineralogical studied for the same studied samples with Abou El-Anwar et al. (2018). This is also supported by the positive relation between MgO and LOI (r = 0.68) (Table 3), where montmorillonite is unstable at high temperature.

Also, the higher average content of Mn (~ 1181 ppm) is attributed to its high level in the parent source rocks mainly the basaltic rocks of the Ethiopian plateau, where Mn is substituted with iron in the ferromagnesian silicate minerals (Table 2).

The negative correlation between CaO and all major oxides indicates that Ca is present mainly in the form of carbonate minerals. High levels of calcite were identified by the XRD results (Abou El-Anwar et al. 2018) and chemical analysis (Table 1). The very low correlation between CaO and both of LOI (r = − 0.02) and CaCO3 (r = 0.10) (Table 3) suggests other sources for Ca than carbonate minerals; Ca-albite (Abou El-Anwar et al. 2018).

The higher content (1.83%) of TiO2 than the world soil (0.55%) (Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee 2007) point to the presence of abundance Ti-bearing minerals. The very strong positive relation between TiO2 and both of Fe2O3 (r = 0.95) and MgO (r = 0.85) indicated the role of ferromagnesian minerals in Ti distribution. Also, the strong positive relation of TiO2 with Al2O3, silt, and clay (r = 0.92, 0.56, and 0.48; respectively) indicated another source of Ti; clay minerals.

The Na2O content is positively correlated with Al2O3, Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2 with correlation coefficients of r = 0.56, 0.67, 0.74, and 0.60, respectively (Table 3), suggesting that Na is mainly associated with silicate minerals (Querol et al. 1998). This result is in accordance with the mineralogical results (Abou El-Anwar et al. 2018) for the same studied samples which indicate the presence of significant amount of albite. Small amounts of Na can be incorporated in the crystal lattice or adsorbed on the clay mineral surfaces. As indicated from the positive relation between Na2O versus silt and clay (r = 0.47 and 0.39, respectively), this supports the confinement of Na in feldspars particles which are largely removed from the clay fraction.

Sulfur (SO3) shows no clear relation with Al2O3, indicating that their occurrence is largely conquered by gypsum and/or phosphatic fertilizer, which is confirmed with the positive correlation (r = 0.70 and 0.82, respectively) between SO3 and both of gypsum (CaSO4) and P2O5 (Table 3). Also, Cl has a positive relationship with Na2O (r = 0.49, Table 3) which revealed that Cl may mainly come from irrigation water. P2O5 contents range from 0.26 to 2.11%. Sample No. 1 represented the highest values of both P2O5 and SO3 (2.11 and 3.5%, respectively), where this sample is located south of Mangabad fertilizer factory.

Loss on ignition (LOI) ranges from 3.31 to 15.74% with an average of 9.55% (Table 1). The main contributors to LOI are fine particle (silt and clay) minerals. This is confirmed from the significant positive correlation between LOI versus silt, clay, Al2O3, Fe2O3, MgO, Na2O, and TiO2 (r = 0.89, 0.69, 0.54, 0.49, 0.68, 0.49, and 0.38, respectively) (Table 3). The higher LOI values confirm the content of montmorillonite while lower values confirm high kaolinite content, which is in agreement with Al-Gamal (2011).

Gypsum is a characteristic mineral in the soil of arid and semi-arid regions. Gypsum is a moderately soluble source of the essential nutrients for the plants (Choudhary et al. 2004). It is formed from the oxidation of pyrite in the environment rich in calcium carbonate or leaching of hillslope sediments rich in gypsum (Herrero and Porta 2000). It is one of the soluble salts that have dangerous effects on the soils, buildings, and earth structures if occurred in high quantities (Razouki and Kuttah 2006). Gypsum contents vary from null to 11.4% in the investigated soil samples (Table 1). Soils can be classified as gypsiferous soil if gypsum constitutes > 50% (Al-Marsoumi et al. 2008). It was observed that more than 69% of the studied samples contain less than 0.5% gypsum. Consequently, gypsum may be derived from the weathering of the limestone plateau in the western side of the study area.

The statistical analysis supported the control of major oxides in the mineralogical composition of the soil. Where five principal components (PCs) were extracted (Table 4 and Fig. 3). The PC1 has 43.76% of the variance and represent the role of clay minerals where Al, Ti, Fe, Na, Mg, silt, and clay are loaded in this PC. In PC2, gypsum, CaO, P2O5, and SO3 were loaded and indicated the role of used fertilizers and have 17.76% of the variance. The PC3 represented 12.6% of the variance and indicated the role of marine sediment where it loads Ca, Na, and Cl.

Table 4 Principal component matrix of the extracted factors controlling major oxides
Fig. 3

Component plot in rotated space

The trace elements

Trace metals can be accumulated in soils as a result of human activities and consequentially affect human health. The values of maximum allowable limits (MAL) must be taken into consideration for the assessment of heavy metal pollution in soils (Ji et al. 2012).

The average concentrations of the trace elements Mn, Zr, Zn, Cr, Ni, Pb, Co, Cu, As, and Cd are ~ 1181, ~ 266, ~ 119, ~ 117, ~ 84, ~ 38, ~ 35, ~ 32, 15.41, and 1.37 ppm, respectively (Table 2). The average concentrations in worldwide soil were 437, 300, 63, 54, 22, 25, 7.9, 20, 5, and 0.5 ppm, respectively (Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee 2007). It was observed the enrichment of the studied soils with these elements than the world soil. Heavy metals are one of the most soil, water, and plant pollutants (Elnazer et al. 2015; Salman et al. 2017), owing to their persistent, non-biodegradable, and toxic characteristics (Massas et al. 2009).

Contamination of agricultural soils by heavy metals may result from the use of fertilizers, chemicals, irrigation water, and dust-fall (Salman et al. 2017). This led to trace metals concentrated in foodstuff and potential hazard to human health (Lu et al. 2015). Many studies pointed out the pollution of agricultural soil heavy metals in different localities in Egypt. Darwish and Pollmann (2015) recorded 19.69, 38.17, 133.1, 47.2, and 31.69 ppm of Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, and Pb, respectively in the agricultural soil of Aswan. Also, the agricultural soil was found polluted with Cd in Kafr El-Sheikh, El-Fayoum, El-Mehala El-Kobra, and Kafr El-Zayat and they recorded high concentration of Cd (Al Naggar et al. 2014). Salman (2013) pointed out the pollution of agricultural soils at Sohag Governorate with Cd (22 ppm). On the northern part of the study area at El Minya Governorate, the agriculture soil contains about 1.19 ppm (Asmoay 2017). The exposure to polluted soil with heavy metals has a diverse effect on human health (Karim et al. 2015). Also, polluted soil with Cd, Cu, Cr, and Pb has a negative effect on the yield of oats (Wyszkowska et al. 2006). These metals have a negative effect on soil fertility, water quality, and could be transported to human food chain causing great health risk (Elnazer et al. 2015; Salman et al. 2017).

The high average concentration of Zr, Zn, Cr, Ni, Pb, Co, Cu, As, and Cd (Table 2) indicated an anthropogenic input. Zr, Zn, Cr, Ni, Pb, Co, and Cu are strongly positively correlated with silt, clay fractions, and iron (Table 5). Thus, they may be adsorbed with the clay minerals and/or iron oxy-hydroxides minerals. As, Pb, and Cd are positively correlated with P2O5 (Table 5), which indicated that the phosphatic fertilizer plays a vital role in the pollution of soil with these metals. Also, these elements are positively correlated with each other; consequently, these may be indicating that they concentrated under the same environmental conditions.

Table 5 Correlation matrix of the heavy metals in the studied agricultural soils

Generally, the cultivated soil is affected mainly by (a) agricultural anthropogenic input, such as fertilizers, pesticides, green manure, wastewater irrigation, etc., and (b) atmospheric deposition.

Sample numbers (1, south Mangabad fertilizer factory), (2, 10, 11, and 14, north El-Waleidia electricity station), (12 and 13, west El-Madabk Sewage Station), and (16 south Seed Pharmaceutical factory) represented the highest concentrations in As, Zn, and Pb (Table 2).

Also, sample numbers (1) in north, 12 and 13 in south, and 16 nearby the Seed Pharmaceutical factory represented high concentration in all the heavy and toxic elements (Table 2). In addition, samples number 3 and 4 recorded high content in Mn, Zn, Zr, As, Pd, Cd, Co, Cu, and Ni which results from the Mangabad fertilizer factory (Table 2). Sample No. (1) recorded the highest percentage of Cd (2.4 ppm), indicating the worst effect of Mangabad fertilizer factory on the soil of cultivated land.

The significant positive correlation (Table 5) is observed between Fe versus Zr, Co, Cr, Cu, and Zn (r = 0.64, 0.93, 0.85, 0.87, and 0.56, respectively). This possibly indicates the adsorption of these elements on Fe-oxy-hydroxide or Fe-rich clay minerals (such as vermiculite mineral, which is detected by the mineralogical studies with Abou El-Anwar et al. (2018). Also, the positive relation between P2O5 versus As, Pb, Cd, and Zn (r = 0.29, 0.21, 0.30, and 0.28, respectively (Table 5) revealed that these toxic elements are mostly related to the Mangabad fertilizer factory.


The mean concentrations of the major elements in these soil decrease from Si > > Al > CaCO3 > Fe > Ca > Mg > OM > Ti > K > Na > P > Mn > S. The concentrations of K, Fe, Ti, and Mg are primarily related to Al, and as such, these elements are dominantly controlled by clay minerals and/or by minerals associated with clays during sedimentation.

The high concentration of Zr, Zn, Cr, Ni, Pb, Co, Cu, As, and Cd indicated their anthropogenic input. As, Pb, and Cd could be mainly coming from the application of phosphatic fertilizer. The industrial activities (Seed Pharmaceutical and Mangabad fertilizer factories) contributed greatly in the pollution of soil with heavy metals.

The authors mentioned to some recommendations which can decrease the effect of the pollutions: (1) create a barrier of suitable size between the wastewater disposal sites and populated or farming areas where contamination represented a problem, (2) augment the awareness of the government about these problems and to help the people to understand the potential extent of such pollutions on their health and plants, and (3) must treat the wastewater to diminish the possibility of contamination.


  1. Abou El-Anwar EA, Mekky HS, Salman SA, Elnazer AA, Abdel Wahab W, Asmoay AS (2018) Mineraological and petrographical studies of Agriculture Soil, Assiut Governorate, Egypt. Bull NRC (Under Published)

  2. Abou El-Anwar EA, Samy YM (2013) Clay mineralogy and geochemical characterization of some Quaternary sediments on Giza-Fayium District, Western Nile Valley, Egypt: relationships to weathering and provenance. J Appl Sci Res 9(8):4765–4780

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Al Naggar Y, Naiem E, Mona M, Giesy JP, Seif A (2014) Metals in agricultural soils and plants in Egypt. Toxicol Environ Chem 96(5):730–742

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Gamal AGI (2011) Comparative geological and mineralogical studies on some Egyptian bentonitic clay deposits. M.Sc. Thesis. Fac. Sci. Al-Azhar Univ, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Marsoumi AMH, Kadhum MJ, Kadhum SK (2008) Some mechanical properties of sandy gypseferous soils in Rumaila - Khor Al-Zubair area, southern Iraq. Marina Mesopotamica 23(2):333–347

    Google Scholar 

  6. Asmoay ASA (2017) Hydrogeochemical studies on the water resources and soil characteristics in the Western Bank of the River Nile between Abu Qurqas and Dayr Mawas, El Minya Governorate, Egypt. Ph.D. thesis. Fac. Sci. Al-Azhar Univ, Egypt, p 255

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bekir RK (1997) The Nile Valley soil, types and clay minerals characteristics, Sohag, Egypt. Egypt Mineral 9:251–264

    Google Scholar 

  8. Choudhary OP, Josan AS, Bajwa MS, Kapur ML (2004) Effect of sustained sodic and saline-sodic irrigation and application of gypsum and farmyard manure on yield and quality of sugarcane under semi-arid conditions. Field Crop Res 87:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Conoco. Geologic map of Egypt. Egyptian General Authority for Petroleum. Scale (1:500,000), NG 36 NW Asyut. 1987

    Google Scholar 

  10. Darwish MAG, Pollmann H (2015) Trace elements assessment in agricultural and desert soils of Aswan area, south Egypt: geochemical characteristics and environmental impacts. J Afr Earth Sci 112:358–373

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elgharably A, Abdel Mageed A, Elgharably G (2014) Status of heavy metals in soils of Assiut as affected by the long-term use of sewage water in crop irrigation: case study. Egypt J Soil Sci 54(4):289–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elnazer AA, Salman SA, Seleem EM, Abu El Ella EM (2015) Assessment of some heavy metals pollution and bioavailability in roadside soil of Alexandria-Marsa Matruh Highway, Egypt. Intern J Ecol:7. Article ID 689420

  13. El-Sayed EA, Hegazy MNA (1993) Total contents and extractable amounts of Cd, Co, Cr and Ni in some soils of El-Fayoum Govern. Egypt. Fayoum. J Agric Res Develop 7:46–56

    Google Scholar 

  14. Galinha C, Freitas MC, Pacheco AMG (2010) Enrichment factors and transfer coefficients from soil to rye plants by INAA. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 286:583–589

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Herrero J, Porta J (2000) The terminology and the concepts of gypsum-rich soils. Geoderma 96:47–61

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hussein AN, Omar H, Jamaludin S (2004) Slope assessment and management. In: Huat BBK, Gue SS, Ali FH (eds) Tropical Residual Soils Engineering. Balkema, Taylor and Francis, UK, pp 103–120

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ji W, Yang T, Ma S, Ni W (2012) Heavy metal pollution of soils in the site of a retired paint and ink factory. Energy Procedia 16:21–26

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kabata-Pendias A, Mukherjee AB (2007) Trace elements from soil to human. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, p 550

    Google Scholar 

  19. Karim Z, Qureshi BA, Mumtaz M (2015) Geochemical baseline determination and pollution assessment of heavy metals in urban soils of Karachi, Pakistan. Ecol Indicat 48:358–364

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khalifa MA, Abu El Gar MS, Helal S, Hussein AW (2004) Depositional history of the Lower Eocene drowned carbonate platform (Drunka Formation), west of Assiut and El Minia stretch, Western Desert, Egypt. In: The 7Th Intern. Conf. Geol. Arab World, Cairo Univ., pp 233–254

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu D, Yang Q, Tang D, Kang X, Huang W (2001) Geochemistry of sulfur and elements in coals from the Antaibao surface mine, Pingshuo, Shanxi Province, China. Intern J Coal Geol 46:51–64

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu Y, Song S, Wang R, Liu Z, Meng J, Sweetman AJ, Jenkins A, Ferrier RC, Li H, Luo W, Wang T (2015) Impacts of soil and water pollution on food safety and health risks in China. Environ Intern 77:5–15

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Massas I, Ehaliotis C, Gerontidis S, Sarris E (2009) Elevated heavy metal concentrations in top soils of an Aegean Islan town (Greece): Total and available forms, origin and distribution. Environ Monit Assess 151(1):105–116

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Melegy AA, El-Agami NL (2004) Factors controlling the chemistry and mineralogy of selected soil types of the Czech Republic and Egypt. Bull Geosci 79(1):71–79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohamed TA, Mohamed MA, Rabeiy R, Ghandour MA (2013) A study of heavy metals in the dust fall around Assiut fertilizer plant. J Environ Prot 4:1488–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mohamed WS, Ismail EA, Zaki R, Kamel A (2015) Regional assessment of heavy metals pollution in irrigated soils, west El Minia district, Egypt. Egypt J Geol 59:101–112

    Google Scholar 

  27. Omer AA (1996) Geological, mineralogical and geochemical studies on the Neogene and Quaternary Nile basin deposits, Qena-Assiut stretch, Egypt. Ph.D. thesis, Geol. Dept. Fac. Sci., Sohag, South Valley Univ, p 320

    Google Scholar 

  28. Osman HZ (1980) Geological studies on the area to the northwest of Assiut. M.Sc. thesis. Fac. Sci., Assiut Univ, Assiut, p 276

    Google Scholar 

  29. Querol X, Finkelman RB, Alastuey A, Huerta A, Palmer CA, Mroczkowski S, Kolker A, Chenery SNR, Robinson JJ, Lopez-Soler A (1998) Quantitative determination of modes of occurrence of major, minor and trace elements in coal: a comparison of results from different methods. In: Proceedings of the AIE 8th Australian Coal Conference, pp 51–56

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rabie FH, Abd El-Sabour MF (1999) Studies on Fe, Mn, Ni and Pb load on soil and its enrichment factor ratios in different soil grain size fractions as an indicator for soil pollutin. Ass Univ Bull Environ Res 2(2):11–22

    Google Scholar 

  31. Razouki SS, Kuttah DK (2006) Predicting long-term soaked CBR of gypsiferous subgrade soils. Proc Inst Civ Eng Transport 159(3):135–140

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rudnick RL, Gao S (2014) Composition of the continental crust. Treat Geochem 4:1–51

    Google Scholar 

  33. Said R (1962) The geology of Egypt. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam-New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Said R (1981) The geological evolution of the River Nile. Springer Verlag, New York, Heidelbeirg, Berlin, p 151

    Google Scholar 

  35. Salman SA (2008) Study of some environmental impacts on Maghara Coal Mine area. M.Sc. Thesis, Fac. Sci., Al-Azhar Univ., Egypt

  36. Salman SA (2013) Geochemical and environmental studies on the territories west River Nile, Sohag Governorate Egypt. Ph.D. Thesis. Fac. Sci., Al-Azhar Uni, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  37. Salman SA, Elnazer AA, El Nazer HA (2017) Integrated mass balance of some heavy metals fluxes in Yaakob village, south Sohag, Egypt. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1011–1018

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Samuding K, Abustan I, Abdul Rahman MT, Isa MH (2009) Distribution of heavy metals profile in groundwater system at solid waste disposal site. Eur J Sci Res 1:58–66

    Google Scholar 

  39. Van der Veer G (2006) Geochemical soil survey of the Netherlands: Atlas of major and trace elements in topsoil and parent material; assessment of natural and anthropogenic enrichment factors. Fac Earth Sci, Utrecht Univ, Netherlands

  40. Wyszkowska J, Kucharski J, Lajszner W (2006) The effects of copper on soil biochemical properties and its interaction with other heavy metals. Pol J Environ Stud 15(6):927–934

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank The Geological Sciences Dept., National Research Centre for facilitates during this work.


NRC internal project ID: 11080101.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Author information




All authors contributed equally in all article steps. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. A. Abou El-Anwar.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate


Consent for publication


Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abou El-Anwar, E.A., Mekky, H.S., Abdel Wahab, W. et al. Geochemical characteristics of agricultural soils, Assiut governorate, Egypt. Bull Natl Res Cent 43, 41 (2019).

Download citation


  • Geochemistry
  • Anthropogenic activities
  • Heavy metals
  • Pollution