Economic analysis of rhizobia and azospirilla co-inoculation in common beans

Bulletin of the National Research Centre

Table 4 Economic analysis of common bean cultivated with different nitrogen supply treatments, conducted in the 2019/20 waters season in Santo Antônio de Goiás-GO

Treatments¹	Grain yield		Product equivalence		Gross revenue		Production cost
Treatments¹	kg ha⁻¹		Bags 60 kg ha⁻¹		US$ a⁻¹		US$ ha⁻¹
AC	2752.47	a	45.87	a	2110.84	a	279.90
NfT	2411.15	b	40.19	b	1849.09	b	329.57
Rt	2862.73	a	47.71	a	2195.40	a	280.86
Rt + Ab1l	2199.28	b	36.65	b	1686.61	b	288.34
Rt + Ab2l	2392.51	b	39.88	b	1834.79	b	289.69
Rt + Ab3l	2483.60	b	41.39	b	1904.65	b	291.03
Rt + Ab4l	2288.10	b	38.14	b	1754.72	b	292.38
RP	2760.63	a	46.01	a	2117.10	a	291.03
Avereage	2518.81		41.98		1931.65		292.85

¹AC—Absolute control (without inoculation and fertilization), NfT—nitrogen fertilization (80 kg N ha⁻¹ of N, being 20 kg N ha⁻¹ at sowing and 60 kg N ha⁻¹ at the V4 stage), Rt—two doses of R. tropici in the seed, Rt + Ab1l—two doses of R. tropici in the seed + one dose of A. brasilense applied in V2–V3, Rt + Ab2l—two doses of R. tropici in the seed + two doses of A. brasilense applied in V2–V3, Rt + Ab3l—two doses of R. tropici in the seed + three doses of A. brasilense applied in V2–V3, Rt + Ab4l—two doses of R. tropici in the seed + four doses of A. brasilense applied in V2–V3, and RP-registered product (two doses of R. tropici in the seed + three doses of A. brasilense applied in V2–V3
²Average values of grain yield as reported by Messias et al. (2023). Means followed by the same letter within the same column do not differ by the Scott–Knott test (p ≤ 0.05)