|  | Physicochemical parameter evaluation | Treatments | Blood glucose level | Wound healing | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honey Sample (n = 15) | Values compared to CAC/IHC | Moisture content No (%) | Ash content No (%) | Electrical Conductivity No (%) | HMF No (%) | Honey sample (n = 8) | Numb. of mice treated | Compared to FBGL | After 12 h No (%) | Closure of wound size | After 8 days No (%) |
HB | HighA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | HB | n = 16 | Fall belowP | 15 (94%) | Closed upP | 14 (93.8%) |
LowF | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 6 (40) | Rise aboveF | 1 (6.25%) | Little close upA | 1 (6.25%) | |||
StandardP | 15 (100) | 15 (100) | 15 (100) | 9 (60) | Same levelA | 0 (0%) | No improvementF | 0 (0%) | |||
HS | HighA | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | HS | n = 16 | Fall belowP | 5 (31.3%) | Closed upP | 7 (43.8%) |
LowF | 3 (20) | 7 (46.67) | 3 (20) | 4 (26.6) | Rise aboveF | 11 (69%) | Little close upA | 4 (25.0%) | |||
StandardP | 10 (66.67) | 8 (53.3) | 12 (80) | 11 (73.3) | Same levelA | 0 (0%) | No improvementF | 4 (25.0%) | |||
HL | HighA | 3 (20) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | HL | n = 16 | Fall belowP | 4 (25.0%) | Closed upP | 5 (31.3%) |
LowF | 4 (26.6) | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | Rise aboveF | 12 (75%) | Little close upA | 4 (25.0%) | |||
StandardP | 8 (53.3) | 13 (86.67) | 15 (100) | 15 (100) | Same levelA | 1 (6.25%) | No improvementF | 6 (37.5%) |
Honey samples | % Original (P) | % Adulterated (A) | % Fake (F) |
---|---|---|---|
HB | 91.3 | 8.7 | 0 |
HS | 58.06 | 6.39 | 34.55 |
HL | 66.05 | 8.54 | 25.4 |