Table 3 Efficacy of different treatments against sucking pests of betel leaf (mean of three sprayings)
From: Sustainable management approach for sucking pests control in betel leaf of Bangladesh
Treatments | No. of black fly/vine | % reduction over control | No. of white fly/vine | % reduction over control | No. of red mite /vine | % reduction over control | No. of mealy bug /vine | % reduction over control |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sanitation + spinosad + abamectin | 3.51d | 78.06 | 2.23de | 74.40 | 1.92 cd | 73.66 | 0.91d | 87.15 |
Sanitation + azadirachtin + antario | 7.55c | 52.81 | 3.60c | 58.67 | 3.11c | 57.34 | 3.92b | 44.63 |
Sanitation + abamectin + fytoclean | 11.43b | 28.56 | 4.92b | 43.51 | 5.14b | 29.49 | 1.75 cd | 75.28 |
Sanitation + fizimite + antario | 3.11d | 80.56 | 1.33e | 84.73 | 1.28d | 82.44 | 0.64d | 90.96 |
Farmers practice | 6.86c | 57.13 | 2.95 cd | 66.13 | 2.97 cd | 59.26 | 2.60c | 63.28 |
Untreated control | 16.00a | – | 8.71a | – | 7.29a | – | 7.08a | – |
Level of sigf. | ** | – | ** | – | ** | – | ** | – |
CV (%) | 6.95 | 10.10 | – | 17.63 | – | 16.43 | – |