Characterization and insecticidal activity of two natural formulation types against the scale insect (Parlatoria ziziphi) and their biochemical effects on Citrus aurantium

The scale insect, Parlatoria ziziphi (Lucas) (Diaspididae: Hemiptera), is one of the most serious insects in citrus orchards in Egypt. The efficiency of two different formulation types (emulsifiable concentrates (EC) and nanoemulsions) based on the essential oils Artemisia herba-alba (Asso.) (Asterales: Asteraceae) and Laurus nobilis (L.) (Laurales: Lauraceae) at two concentrations of 3 and 5%, compared with the commercial mineral oil, Active Cable, was examined against P. ziziphi. The green formulations were named Artemisia and Laury relative to A. herba-alba and L. nobilis, respectively. The physicochemical properties of the tested formulations have been studied. All the EC formulations of the essential oils (EOs) as well as the nanoemulsions with ratios of EOs to Tween 1:1.5 (Artemisia) and 1:2 (Laury) passed all the tested characteristics. The droplet sizes of the successful nanoemulsions’ formulations by the ultrasonic emulsification were 153.7, 113.4 nm for Artemisia and 139.3, 89.4 nm for Laury at 3 and 5% concentrations, respectively. Laury EC caused average reductions of 92.79 and 94.94% (nymphs and females) when applied at 3 and 5%, respectively, while the same oil prepared as nanoemulsions caused average reductions of 50.02 and 55.32% at the same concentrations, compared with 91.74% reduction resulted from spraying Active Cable. Moreover, Artemisia caused reduction percentages of 74.97, 91.52 for EC and 43.7, 54.01 for nanoemulsions, sprayed at 3 and 5%, respectively. Although EC emulsions were more effective in reducing insect populations than nanoemulsion formulations, the efficiency of nanoemulsions gradually increased with time elapsed. The antioxidant activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and polyphenol oxidase enzymes were researched. It is recognized that insect infestations increase plant enzyme activity to defend them against insect attack. The results revealed a significant reduction of all the examined enzymes which were more obvious for EC emulsions than nanoemulsions. The EC formulations originated from the EOs, especially Laury 3% EC and Artemisia 5% EC, could be an alternative to the traditional insecticides for controlling the scale insect, P. ziziphi.

popularity that contributes to human nutrition. Citrus fruits (Family: Rutaceae) have commercial production in over 137 countries (Kahramanoğlu et al. 2020). World production is about 142.5 million tons of fruit in 2018 (Statista 2020).
The black parlatoria scale, Parlatoria ziziphi (Lucas) (Family: Hemiptera), is one of the most critical pests attacking citrus trees in the Mediterranean Basin and many other countries worldwide (Assouguem et al. 2021). The infestation by this insect triggers drying and weakening of the tree aerial parts, chlorosis and untimely drops of leaves, twig dieback and branching, and most prominently, a commercial loss in the fruits due to distorted fruits and fruit dropping before ripeness (Faskha 2021).
Because of the lipophilic nature of synthetic pesticides, they can gather in lipid tissues and plants, causing negative impacts on humans, non-target organisms, and the environment. Furthermore, pest resistance and tolerance have increased because of greater pesticide use (Mossa et al. 2019;Sammour et al. 2018). As a result, attention has been focused on the use of natural and biosafe pesticides for pest control (Ansari et al. 2014;Sammour et al. 2018;Sharma and Singhvi 2017).
Essential oils (EOs) are rich in biological active substances like terpenoids and phenolic acids, which possess antimicrobial, antioxidants, antiviral, and insecticidal properties (Aumeeruddy-Elalfi et al. 2015;Sammour et al. 2018). Previous studies have reported the scolicidal activity of many EOs such as almond, black seed, citrus, clove, coconut, henna, lavender, peppermint, and sesame (Al-Dosary et al. 2008;Benaissa and Belhamra 2017;Karamaouna et al. 2013). Many insect pests have been investigated by several investigators using EOs obtained from Laurus nobilis (L.) (Family: Lauraceae) and Artemisia herba-alba (Asso.) (Family: Asteraceae) for their biological activities on many insect pests (Derbalah et al. 2012;Ebrahimi et al. 2013;El-Bakry et al. 2016). On the other hand, the main disadvantages of using EOs in pest control are their unstable nature when exposed to air, light, humidity, and elevated temperatures, which can cause fast volatilization and decomposition of some active compounds (Badawy et al. 2018;Ibrahim 2019). The urgent need to bypass the sensitivity and increase the stability of biologically active ingredients encounters several potential issues correlated with the incorporation of EOs and their constituents into suitable formulations (Sugumar et al. 2013).
Previous studies referred to the usage of plant EOs as emulsions and nanoemulsions to control insects depending on their physical and chemical properties (Abdelaziz et al. 2014;Badawy et al. 2018;Sammour et al. 2018;Sundararajan et al. 2018). EC (the emulsifiable concentrates) are comprised of an oil-soluble active compound dissolved in a suitable oil-based solvent, and an emulsifier is added to manage mixing with water (Salem et al. 2016). The nanoemulsion involves an oil phase which is spread in continuous water, with each oil droplet enclosed by a thin surface molecular film, thereby helping to balance the nanomolecules' system into more steady formula (Badawy et al. 2018;Tadros et al. 2004). Surfactants can aid in the reduction of the interfacial tension between the oil phase and the aqueous phase (El-Bakry et al. 2021). As a result, surfactants play a critical role in the stabilization and enhancement of the effectiveness of EC and nanoemulsions (Sugumar et al. 2013).
To comprehend the biochemical alterations triggered by the tested insect on citrus orchards, the activity of the antioxidant enzymes should be inquired. These enzymes play a critical role in safeguarding plants from insect attack. It is clear that plants' activity generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) as signaling molecules to resist insect harm (Mittler 2002). The antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) are the main plant ROS-scavenging mechanisms (Apel and Hirt 2004). Further, the polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzyme may have a role in the defense response encompassing plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stress (Jung 2004). Therefore, the aim of this research was to assess the efficiency of EC and nanoemulsion formulations from EOs in comparison with the commercial mineral oil, Active Cable, against the scale insect P. ziziphi, as well as the biochemical effects of the tested compounds on the oxidative enzymes of treated plants.

Plant materials
Leaves of two plant species, A. herba-alba and L. nobilis, were collected during the flowering stage from the farm of medicinal and aromatic plants at the National Research Centre, Egypt.

Preparation of the essential oils
The collected plant materials were washed with tap water, followed by distilled water, and dried under shade for 5 days at room temperature (26 ± 1 °C). For 5 h, 1000 g of each plant's leaves were subjected to a hydro-distillation using the Clevenger apparatus. The resultant oils were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and kept in dark bottles at 4 °C until used for chemical analysis and the insecticides formulations.

GC-MS analysis
To identify the main constituents of the plant EOs, the extracted EOs were diluted with diethyl ether and 1 µl was injected into gas chromatography (Trace GC and then isothermal at 280 ºC for 5 min. The carrier gas was helium at a flow rate of 1 mL min −1 . Spectra were obtained in the electronic ionization mode with 70 eV ionization energy.

Preparation of the tested formulated compounds
The compounds were naturally prepared as EC and nanoemulsion formulations. The formulations of A. herba-alba and L. nobilis were named Artemisia and Laury, respectively.

Emulsifiable concentrate formulations (EC)
Two EOs were prepared as EC formulations by mixing each essential oil separately in appropriate amounts of an emulsifier and natural solvents (vegetable and mineral oils) (Fig. 1). Each EO was formulated at two concentrations (3 and 5%).

Nanoemulsion formulations
For the preparation of nanoemulsions of A. herba-alba and L. nobilis oils, Tween 80 was used as an emulsifier. Two different concentrations (3 and 5%) of each EO were formulated as nanoemulsions. The nanoemulsions were prepared in two phases (Fig. 1). The organic phase (EO and surfactant) was prepared by mixing EO and Tween 80 at ratios of 1:0.5, 1:1, 1:1.5, 1:2, and 1:2.5 w/w, respectively. Then, the aqueous phase of deionized water (D.W.) was added to the organic phase and explored on a magnetic stirrer for 30 min at 4000 rpm to get an emulsion. The emulsions formed were subjected to a sonication time of 10 min using ultrasonic (Sonics & Materials, INC. 53 Church Hill Rd. Newtown, CT, USA) with a probe diameter of 13 mm at a high frequency of 20 kHz and a power output of 750 W. The energy was given through a sonicator probe, and ice was used to reduce the energy. The commercial mineral oil compound, Active Cable (EC), was supplied by Al-Ismaelia Company for chemical products. It is a summer oil used on plants when foliage is present. The compound is a lubrication cut of petroleum oil, prepared as an emulsifiable concentrate for controlling scale insects infesting citrus crops. The compound was sprayed as a reference at the recommended rate of 1 L/100 L water.

EC emulsion stability
The test was carried out according to WHO specifications (WHO 1979). Into a 250 mL beaker, 75-80 mL of distilled water was poured. Five mL of the EC was added with a pipette while stirring with a glass rod. The beaker contents were completed to 100 mL with distilled water, while the stirring was continuous. The beaker contents were poured immediately into a graduated 100 mL cylinder. The stirring time equaled 3 min from the beginning of the addition of the EC until the emulsion was poured into the cylinder. The cylinder was kept at 30-31 °C for one hour and examined for any free oil or creaming separation.

Foam formation
The emulsion stability test was carried out to measure the foam amounts formed on the emulsion surface in the cylinder after 5 min.

Nanoemulsion characterization
Artemisia and Laury nanoemulsions were studied for physicochemical properties. The stability of nanoemulsions was tested with different stress factors such as centrifugation, heating-cooling, and freezing . The prepared formulations were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 30 min at 25 °C to observe phase separation if any, formulations that did not show any phase separation were subjected to the heatingcooling test to find out the stability of nanoemulsions at varying temperatures, i.e., at 4° C and 45° C for 48 h at each temperature. Then, the formulations that did not show any phase separation were stored under freezing conditions for 48 h. Finally, the stable nanoemulsions were stored for 4 weeks at room temperature for more observations such as separation or creaming layers. The droplet size of the final stable formulations was evaluated.

Analysis of nanoemulsion droplet size
The size and size distribution of nanoemulsions were determined by a dynamic light scattering instrument (PSS, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) at 23 °C, using the 632 nm line of a HeNe laser as the incident light with an angle of 90°.

Insect sampling and inspecting
Homogenated trees of the citrus orchard, Citrus aurantium L., infested with the black parlatoria scale, P. ziziphi at Barrage district, Qalyubia Governorate, were selected. Treatments of Artemisia and Laury at 3 and 5% (EC and nanoemulsions) along with the commercial compound Active Cable (EC) at 1% concentration were sprayed. The concentrations of EC and nanoemulsion formulations were established through preliminary bioassays by the preparation of a series of EO concentrations. The prepared formulations were sprayed at a rate of 1 L/200 L water. The control treatment was sprayed with water only. Samples of the infested leaves (60 leaves/treatment), i.e., 20 leaves/tree, were taken from different tree directions. Samples were transferred to the laboratory and inspected using a binocular microscope. Both the upper and lower surfaces of leaves were inspected, taking into consideration counts of live and dead individuals for both nymphs and females. Samples were taken before spraying, and after 7, 14, and 21 days from application. Percentages of reduction of nymphs and female populations were calculated according to Henderson and Tilton (1955).
where Ta and Tb are number of insects in the treatment after and before application, respectively; Cb and Ca are number of insects in the control before and after application, respectively.

The side effects of the tested compounds on the oxidative enzymes of the treated plants
Samples of the tested formulations were taken before spraying, and after 7, 14, and 21 days from application. Other samples from the control were also taken after the same previously tested periods.

Enzyme preparation
Enzyme extracts were prepared according to the method described by Chen and Wang (2006). Leaf tissues were homogenized in ice-cold phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.8), followed by centrifugation at 8000 rpm and 4 °C for 15 min. The supernatant was used to determine the activities of the tested enzymes.

Catalase (CAT)
CAT (EC 1.11.1.6) activity was determined spectrophotometrically by following the decrease in absorbance at 240 nm (Chen and Wang 2006). The enzyme activity was calculated by Kong et al. (1999). (PPO, EC 1.10.3.1) activity was determined using a spectrophotometric method based on an initial rate of increase in absorbance at 410 nm (Soliva et al. 2000). The absorbance at 410 nm was recorded continuously at 25 °C for 5 min.

Statistical analysis
Data were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan's multiple range test to determine significant differences among mean values at the probability level of 0.05, using SPSS 25.0 software program (SPSS 2019).

Characterizations of EC formulations
Maintaining EC formulations down the environmental storage conditions is one of the most critical factors for governing their efficiency and persistence. The prepared EC formulations, Artemisia and Laury, were examined at concentrations of 3 and 5% through the emulsion stability. The cream layers of the evaluated formulations were in the range of 1.5 to 2 mL (Table 2). Foam formation results revealed that all the prepared EC formulations passed the foam formation, where the foam layers were 0 mL for Laury and 2, 2.5 mL for Artemisia, at 3 and 5%, respectively (Table 2).

Characterizations of nanoemulsions
Different ratios (1:0.5 to 1:2.5 w/w) of each A. herba-alba and L. nobilis EOs and Tween 80 were mixed separately to find the best ratio of EO and the surfactant. Nanoemulsions were subjected to strict storage conditions to ensure that the prepared formulations would remain stable during storage. Among all the combinations, the nanoemulsions with ratios of EOs to Tween 1:1.5, 1:2, and 1:2.5 of Artemisia and 1:2 and 1:2.5 of Laury were found to be more stable after centrifugation, heating, cooling, and freeze cycles at 3 and 5% concentrations as there were no observations of phase separation.
Therefore, the droplet sizes of the successful samples with lower surfactant concentration were measured (EOs to Tween 1:1.5 of Artemisia and 1:2 of Laury at 3 and 5% active ingredient). Results in Table 3 showed that the mean droplet size diameter was 153.7 and 113.4 nm for Artemisia (Fig. 2) and 139.3 and 89.2 nm for Laury at 3 and 5%, respectively (Fig. 3).

Bioefficacy of EC and nanoemulsion formulations on P. ziziphi females' population
The insecticidal efficiency of two formulation types of EC and nanoemulsions based on the EOs, A. herba-alba and L. nobilis, against the females' population of the scale insect, P. ziziphi, was evaluated. Data in Table 4    Concerning the average percentage of reduction of the insect population (females and nymphs) of P. ziziphi, data cleared that Laury 3 and 5% of EC emulsions reduced the insect population by 92.79 and 94.94, respectively, while the corresponding values of their nanoemulsions were 50.02 and 55.32% (Table 6). As for Artemisia EC treatments, data revealed that the concentration of 5% increased the efficiency by 91.52%, compared with 74.97% for the concentration of 3%. In the same trend, the percentage of reduction

The biochemical impacts of the examined compounds on the citrus orchards' enzymatic antioxidants Superoxide dismutase enzyme (SOD)
The effect of Laury and Artemisia formulations (EC and nanoemulsions) compared with Active Cable oil on SOD enzyme activity at different intervals (7, 14, and 21 days) is summarized in Table 7. The treated plants significantly differed in their activity during all testing intervals. Before spraying, the activity of SOD ranged between 794 and 827 U/g fresh weight/hour. Laury 5% (EC) exhibited the lowest significant decrease in enzyme activity with 225.33 U/g f.w/h, while the control had the highest activity (828) at 7 days after treatment (DAT). Laury 3% and Artemisia 5% EC emulsions were  the following compounds in reducing the enzyme activity with no significant differences (397.33 and 322 U/g. f.w./h, respectively). The activity of EC emulsions was increased, while it was the opposite of nanoemulsions after 14 and 21 DAT. Our findings revealed that there were no significant differences between the nanoemulsions of Laury 3 and 5% at all the tested intervals. In addition, the activity of Laury 3 and 5% and Artemisia 5% nanoemulsions decreased with time elapsed. Furthermore, a variation in the SOD activity resulted from the Active Cable application was observed; the paramount decrease in activity was obtained after 7 DAT (445.33 U/g f.w./h).

CAT enzyme
Regarding the effect of the examined formulations on CAT, the same tendency of activity was observed as SOD (Table 8). All the treated plants were significantly different compared with the control at all measured intervals. The enzyme activity of EC formulations increased with time elapsed, and it was less than nanoemulsions, while the activity of nanoemulsions decreased gradually over time. For example, the activity of Laury 5% nanoemulsion was decreased from 19.84 U/g f.w./h at 7 DAT to 16.95 at 21 DAT. As for Laury 5% EC emulsion, which was the most influential compound in reducing the enzyme activity, a significant decrease in CAT activity was obtained at

Polyphenol oxidase (PPO)
Data in Table 9 elucidated that the variations in PPO activity depend on the effectiveness of the tested compounds. Generally, the results of PPO enzyme activity before spraying cleared that the insect infestation induced a significant increase in PPO activity which ranged between 10.02 and 11.00 U/g f.w./h. EC emulsions were the most influential in reducing PPO activity, where the compounds of Laury and Artemisia at 5% concentration caused the lowest enzyme activity (3.73 and 4.74 U/g f.w./h, respectively, at 7 DAT). Also, Laury and Artemisia at a concentration of 3% and Active Cable oil caused a significant decrease in the enzyme activity (5.28, 5.84, and 5.73 U/g f.w./h, respectively, after 7 DAT) compared with the control (11.49 U/g f.w./h).

Discussion
The major constituents of the isolated EOs from A. herbaalba and L. nobilis were significantly and/or slightly different from the previous reports (Dahmani-Hamzaoui and Baaliouamer 2015; Mathlouthi et al. 2021;Mohsen and Ali 2009;Salido et al. 2001). The variations of the EO concentrations and components might be attributed to many factors, including the geographic site, season, the condition of the environment, the plant nutrition level, and might be some additional factors as well (Badawy et al. 2018;El-Bakry et al. 2016. EC formulations of A. herba-alba and L. nobilis EO were prepared in the current research utilizing suitable emulsifiers and natural solvents (vegetable and mineral oils). Previous investigators prepared successful EC formulations from different EOs by using appropriate amounts of some emulsifiers and natural solvents (mineral and vegetable oils) (Abdel-Aziz et al. 2015;Salem et al. 2016;Sammour et al. 2018). The physical and chemical properties of the studied EC formulations showed that all the formulations passed the emulsion stability and the foam formation, where the maximum cream layer should not exceed 2 mL (WHO 1979) and the foam layer, if any, should not override 5 mL (WHO 1979). This suggests that the evaluated EC formulations could be employed without separation and foaming troubles Sammour et al. 2018). At a sonication time of 10 min, nanoemulsions of the aforementioned EO were prepared by the combination of the EO and Tween 80 with different ratios. Earlier investigations reported that the optimal sonication process time is 10 min, where the additional sonication does not supply further reduction in the droplet size of nanoemulsion (Adak et al. 2020;Pratap-Singh et al. 2021). The results of the mean droplet diameter demonstrated that all the nanoemulsion prepared formulations were in the nanosize range. Many researchers have generated nanoemulsions from some EOs like rosemary, eucalyptus, and cinnamon (Adak et al. 2020;Kaur et al. 2021;Mossa et al. 2019) and evaluated their biological activities against insect pests. In non-balanced systems, emulsions tend to lower their interfacial area and free energy throughout some breakdown techniques, like creaming, sedimentation, flocculation, and coalescence (Badawy et al. 2018). The present study revealed that the prepared nanoemulsions with the highest surfactant concentration exhibited the smallest particle size, which was in correspondence with Arancibia et al. (2017) and Kaur et al. (2021). High surfactant concentration aids in reducing the interfacial tension between the oil and aqueous phases, resulting in smaller particle sizes (Yildirim et al. 2017). The current research elucidated that treatments with EC emulsions were more efficient than nanoemulsions for increasing the reduction percent of infestations. All the tested stages, except crawlers, were fixed, settled on the plant surface, and their bodies were covered with scale. The higher insect responsibility to EC emulsions than to nanoemulsions may be due to the fact that EC emulsions kill scale insects via contact by making a thin film from oil solution around the insect wax cover. This film prevents insects from breathing oxygen (Mead et al. 2016;Salem et al. 2016). They also kill scale insects by disrupting their feeding on the oil-covered surfaces; therefore, their toxic action on scale insects is more physical than chemical. Consequently, EC formulations which have a droplet size diameter greater than nanoemulsions are more efficient than nanoemulsions. Campolo et al. (2017) revealed that higher mortality on eggs (as a settled stage) of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Gelechiidae: Lepidoptera) by citrus peel essential oil emulsions was done through contact toxicity, but on larvae (as a mobile stage) higher mortality by EOs emulsions was done through contact and ingestion toxicity, respectively. The effect of nanoemulsions depends on the penetration of the insect's waxy cuticle and the plant tissue, which leads to the movement through the plant sap and sucking by scale insects, causing kill (Mustafa and Hussein 2020).
The obtained results showed that the efficiency of EC compounds decreased after 7 d, which was the opposite of nanoemulsions. These results indicated that nanoemulsions had persistent properties compared to EC formulations. Sabbour and Abd El-Aziz (2019) reported that nanoemulsion formulations avoid the rapid degradation and evaporation and improve insecticidal persistence. Further, Yang et al. (2009) found that the efficacy of garlic EO nanoparticles on Tribolium castaneum was lower relative to its free essential oil in the first month, but this became gradually stronger in the following months compared to the free essential oil. Data also cleared that EC formulations of Laury and Artemisia 5% along with the commercial mineral oil, Active Cable, were the most potent as they were not significantly different. Previous research elucidated the role of essential oil formulations in reducing the scale insects' infestations. Abdelaziz et al. (2014) mentioned that a laboratory-prepared formulation based on rosemary EO was effective in reducing the population of Aulacaspis tubercularis (Newstead) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Moreover, Salem et al. (2016) revealed that the laboratory EO formulations of Cymbopogon citratus (Stapf.) (Poales: Poaceae), C. nardus (L.) (Poales: Poaceae), and Origanum minutiflorum (Lamiales: Lamiaceae) were more potent on A. tubercularis than the commercial neem oil, Trilogy.
The antioxidant enzymes SOD, CAT, and PPO play an important role in protecting plants from various stresses (including herbivorous insects) as they induce in plants in response to herbivory attack (He et al. 2011). Also, they are the main enzymes in the ROS cleaning system; they can efficiently restrict ROS from damaging the body of living organisms and play an important role in the induced protective response (War et al. 2013). The activity of SOD, CAT, and PPO in the current research was increased before spraying, which indicated that the plants were indeed under insect infestation stress (biotic stress), while the application of the tested formulations declined their activities. Further, EC emulsions inhibited these three enzymes more than nanoemulsions. The lowerenzyme activity may be attributed to the lower survival of insects on the treated plants as mentioned by Adamczyk et al. (2003). Chaman et al. (2001) stated that insect infestations induce changes in the levels of plants' oxidative enzymes. This infestation triggers biotic stresses which stimulate ROS creation, causing an increase in the intrinsic antioxidant enzymes activity such as SOD, catalase, and polyphenol oxidase compared to uninfected plants (Afzal et al. 2014;Kaur et al. 2017).

Conclusions
At 3 and 5% concentrations, EC and nanoemulsion formulations of two plant EOs (A. herba-alba and L. nobilis) were prepared. The droplet size of nanoemulsion formulations ranged from 89.4 to 153.7 nm by ultrasonic emulsification. EC formulations, especially Laury 3% and Artemisia 5%, which originated from the EOs L. nobilis and A. herba-alba along with the commercial formulation Active Cable were the most potent against the scale insect, P. ziziphi, with 92.79, 91.52, and 91.74% reduction of infestation, respectively. All the tested formulations reduced the activity of plant enzymes as an indication of reducing insect infestation. The effect of EC formulations was more obvious than nanoemulsions.