Skip to main content

Table 9 Effects of experimental treatments on grain yield (ton fed−1) during the 2019 and 2020 seasons, drought depression (DD), and relative yield reduction (RYR %) as an average of both seasons

From: Beneficial effects of antitranspirants on water stress tolerance in maize under different plant densities in newly reclaimed land

Grain yield (ton fed−1)

Treatments

Antitranspirants (An)

Mean of IL × PD

Antitranspirants (An)

Mean of IL × PD

Irrigation levels (IL)

Plant densities (PD)

An1: control

An2: chitosan

An3: kaolin

An1: control

An2: chitosan

An3: kaolin

2019 season

2020 season

IL1: 80%

PD1:17.500

2.69

2.96

3.05

2.90

2.55

2.70

2.79

2.68

PD2:23.333

2.95

3.17

3.34

3.15

2.88

3.22

3.29

3.13

PD3:35.000

3.13

3.41

3.63

3.39

3.20

3.59

3.67

3.49

Mean of IL1

2.92

3.18

3.34

3.15

2.88

3.17

3.25

3.10

IL2: 70%

PD1:17.500

2.52

2.83

2.96

2.77

2.37

2.91

3.06

2.78

PD2:23.333

2.67

2.96

3.06

2.90

2.75

3.01

3.13

2.96

PD3:35.000

3.00

3.26

3.38

3.21

2.97

3.32

3.41

3.23

Mean of IL2

2.73

3.01

3.13

2.96

2.70

3.08

3.20

2.99

IL3: 60%

PD1:17.500

2.16

2.38

2.53

2.36

2.16

2.35

2.63

2.38

PD2:23.333

2.35

2.42

2.66

2.48

2.42

2.53

2.65

2.53

PD3:35.000

2.52

2.68

2.94

2.71

2.58

2.74

2.96

2.76

Mean of IL3

2.34

2.49

2.71

2.52

2.39

2.54

2.75

2.56

Mean of (PD × An)

PD1:17.500

2.46

2.72

2.85

2.68

2.36

2.65

2.83

2.61

PD2:23.333

2.66

2.85

3.02

2.84

2.68

2.92

3.02

2.88

PD3:35.000

2.88

3.12

3.32

3.11

2.92

3.22

3.34

3.16

Mean of An

2.67

2.90

3.06

2.65

2.93

3.06

LSD0.05

IL: 0.03

PD: 0.04

IL: 0.04

PD: 0.04

An: 0.03

IL × PD: 0.06

An: 0.02

IL × PD: 0.02

IL × An: 0.05

PD × An: 0.05

IL × An: 0.04

PD × An: 0.04

IL × PD × An: NS

IL × PD × An: 0.07

Treatments

Antitranspirants (An)

Mean of IL × PD

Antitranspirants (An)

Mean of IL × PD

Irrigation levels (IL)

Plant densities (PD)

An1: control

An2: chitosan

An3: kaolin

An1: control

An2: chitosan

An3: kaolin

Drought depression (DD)*

Relative yield reduction (RYR%)**

IL2: 70%

PD1:17.500

0.17

− 0.04

− 0.09

0.01

6.49

− 1.41

− 3.08

0.67

PD2:23.333

0.21

0.21

0.22

0.21

7.19

6.56

6.63

6.79

PD3:35.000

0.18

0.21

0.26

0.22

5.68

6.00

6.85

6.18

Mean of IL2

0.19

0.19

0.13

0.13

0.15

6.45

3.72

 3.47

IL3: 60%

PD1:17.500

0.46

0.46

0.34

0.42

17.56

16.25

11.64

15.15

PD2:23.333

0.53

0.72

0.66

0.64

18.15

22.50

19.88

20.18

PD3:35.000

0.62

0.79

0.70

0.70

19.56

22.57

19.18

20.44

Mean of IL3

0.54

0.54

0.66

 0.57

0.59

18.42

20.44

 16.90

Mean of (PD × An)

PD1:17.500

0.32

0.21

0.13

0.22

12.03

7.42

4.28

7.91

PD2:23.333

0.37

0.47

0.44

0.43

12.67

14.53

13.26

13.49

PD3:35.000

0.40

0.50

0.48

0.46

12.62

14.29

13.02

13.31

Mean of An

0.36

0.40

0.35

12.44

12.08

10.19

  1. * Drought depression (DD) = YnormalYstress (Hossain et al. 1990)
  2. ** Relative yield reduction (RYR %) = 1 − (Ystress/Ynormal) × 100 (Golestani and Assad 1998)