Table 2 Summary of studies assessing the role of bruxism in Implant and Prosthesis Failure
From: Bruxism and implant: where are we? A systematic review
Chitumalla et al. (2018) | 450 Patients 240 M 210 F 20–50 Y | 640 Implants 5 Years follow up 777 prosthesis of different kinds | Bruxism (clinical examination) Mechanical complications | Bruxism is related with dental implant complication | Yes | Multiple variable assessment Exclusion of risk patients | Single variable analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chrcanovic et al. (2017) | 166 patients | 854 Implant in non bruxors (427) vs non bruxor (427) 296 prosthesis of different Kinds Follow up for min 20 years | Bruxism (questionnaire & clinical examination) Implant and prosthetic failure ( Personal Criteria) | Bruxism increase implant failure rate (Odds ratio 2.71) and mechanical complication | Yes | Bruxism diagnosis based on clinical examination | Other risk factors may also have Influenced the results |
Chrcanovic et al. (2020) | 709 patients 318 M, 391 F | 869 Prosthesis (405 M, 464 F) 4,797 implant mean follow-up of 10 years | Bruxism (questionnaire and clinical examination) Implant failure Prosthesis complication (personal criteria) | Bruxism is a contributor to implant and prosthesis failure, (29.4%) | Yes | Multiple variable Assessment Large population Bruxism diagnosis based on clinical examination |