Skip to main content

Table 8 Growth performance, feed intake and feed conversion of Farafra sheep fed different experimental diets

From: Effect of different dietary protein sources on digestibility and growth performance parameters in lambs

Item

Experimental diets

SE

Sig

SBM

BCSM

CSM

SSM

No. of animals

5

5

5

5

  

Feeding period (day)

66

66

66

66

  

Initial body wt. (kg)

43.50

41.50

41.50

39.00

1.66

NS

Final body wt. (kg)

55.40

55.40

57.00

52.60

1.34

NS

Body wt. gain (kg/period)

11.90b

13.90b

15.50a

13.60b

0.47

*

Av. weight gain (g/h/day)

180.30c

210.61b

234.85a

206.06b

7.36

*

Feed intake (g DM/head/days)

Concentrate

1035.32

1162.50

1158.20

1170.46

  

Roughage

308.25

242.35

300.00

295.70

  

Total

1343.57

1404.85

1458.20

1466.16

  

Feed conversion

7.45

6.67

6.21

7.12

0.24

NS

Economic evaluation

Income

380.80

444.80

496.00

435.20

–

–

Feed cost

195.10

203.98

211.55

212.92

–

–

Revenue

185.70

240.82

284.45

222.28

–

–

Efficiency (L.E./h)

–

55.12

98.75

36.58

–

–

Relative efficiency (%)

100

129.68

153.18

119.70

–

–

  1. a, b and c: Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different at (p < 0.01)
  2. SE, standard error; NS, nonsignificant difference
  3. *Significant difference at (p < 0.05), **Significant difference at (p < 0.01). Because group feeding was used in the feeding trial, the data of feed intake did not subject to statistical analysis