Table 2 Comparison of yield and water use efficiency under control and PRD irrigation in different crops
From: Partial root-zone drying (PRD), its effects and agricultural significance: a review
Sr. No. | Experiment location | Crop | Yield | Water use efficiency | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | PRD | Control | PRD | ||||
1 | Australia | Grapes | 3.94 | 3.69 | 7.4 | 13.9 | Du Toit et al. (2003) |
2 | Serbia | Potato | 53.19 | 50.46 | 236.40 | 380.14 | Stikic et al. (2014) |
3 | New Zealand | Tomato | 52.4 | 49.8 | 1.2 | 2.2 | Zegbe et al. (2007) |
4 | Malaysia | Tomato | 8.52 | 7.44 | 1.56 | 2.39 | Ali et al. (2004) |
5 | Serbia | Tomato | 10.73 | 10.05 | 0.21 | 0.34 | Stikic et al. (2003) |
6 | Syria | Maize | 8.5 | 6.1 | 12.80 | 16.20 | Alkhaldi et al. (2012) |
7 | Egypt | Sugarcane | 63.50 | 57.33 | 12.1 | 16.1 | Ibrahim and Emara (2010) |
8 | Iran | Canola | 1.81 | 1.63 | 0.37 | 0.67 | Mousavi-Avval et al. (2011) |
9 | Peru | Potato | 45.1 | 36.2 | 4.9 | 8.1 | Posadas et al. (2008) |
10 | Egypt | Tomato | 11.00 | 9.00 | 26 | 43 | Affi et al. (2012) |
11 | New Zealand | Pepper | 3.70 | 3.45 | 1.20 | 2.00 | Dorji et al. (2005) |
12 | Turkey | Maize | 10.00 | 6.97 | 1.61 | 2.09 | Yazar et al. (2009) |
13 | China | Cotton | 5.8 | 5.4 | - | - | Tang et al. (2005) |
14 | Pakistan | Wheat | 5.52 | 4.75 | 1.89 | 2.67 | Ahmad et al. (2020) |