Skip to main content

Table 4 Combined effect of varieties and postharvest treatments on firmness of tomato during storage and ripening

From: Post-harvest assessment of fruit quality and shelf life of two elite tomato varieties cultivated in Bangladesh

Treatment combination

Firmness (b) of tomato at different days after storage

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

V1T1

2.33

3.33

3.58

3.81

4.00

4.50

4.83

5.20

V1T2

2.10

2.67

2.87

3.33

3.58

3.83

4.00

4.33

V1T3

2.20

2.73

2.92

3.67

3.83

3.92

4.33

4.50

V1T4

2.30

3.25

3.33

3.78

3.98

4.18

4.73

4.90

V1T5

2.25

3.15

3.30

3.76

3.85

4.12

4.41

4.70

V1T6

2.28

3.18

3.31

3.77

3.89

4.15

4.53

4.74

V1T7

1.92

2.25

2.33

2.50

3.08

3.17

3.50

3.67

V1T8

2.08

2.67

2.83

3.00

3.33

3.42

4.00

4.08

V2T1

2.33

2.48

3.16

3.80

3.97

4.13

4.47

5.00

V2T2

1.67

2.08

2.42

2.92

3.17

3.25

3.53

3.62

V2T3

1.87

2.25

2.50

3.08

3.50

3.58

4.08

4.47

V2T4

2.10

2.41

3.08

3.75

3.91

4.10

4.40

4.80

V2T5

1.92

2.27

2.75

3.47

3.70

4.00

4.33

4.58

V2T6

2.00

2.37

2.97

3.53

3.89

4.07

4.38

4.67

V2T7

1.58

2.08

2.17

2.25

2.42

2.67

2.83

2.91

V2T8

1.67

2.08

2.33

2.75

2.83

3.25

3.50

3.58

LSD0.05

0.118

0.204

0.158

0.197

0.257

0.197

0.263

0.246

LSD0.01

0.158

0.274

0.212

0.265

0.347

0.265

0.354

0.332

Level of significance

**

**

*

**

**

**

NS

**

  1. Significant b firmness score (1 hard, 2 sprung, 3 between sprung and eating ripe, 4 eating ripe, 5 over ripe, 6 rotten), NS not
  2. *Significant at 5% level of probability
  3. **Significant at 1% level of probability