Skip to main content

Table 8 Effect of cultivars on nutritional value of snap bean pod during 2017 and 2018 seasons

From: Impact of foliar spraying of nano micronutrient fertilizers on the growth, yield, physical quality, and nutritional value of two snap bean cultivars in sandy soils

Cultivars

Protein (%)

Fibers (%)

TSS content

P (%)

K (%)

Zn (ppm)

Mn (ppm)

Fe (ppm)

Cu ppm

1st season

2nd season

1st season

2nd season

1st season

2nd season

1st season

2nd season

1st season

2nd season

1st season

2nd season

1st season

2nd season

1st season

2nd Season

1st season

2nd season

Bronco

22.9B

21.8B

6.4A

6.5A

3.1B

3.4B

0.34B

0.30B

2.1B

1.5B

24.6B

27.0B

13.5B

13.4B

68.5B

70.5B

7.8B

8.1B

Flantino

27.6 A

27.9A

4.7 B

5.1B

4.0A

4.3A

0.36A

0.32A

2.2A

1.9A

27.4A

29.8A

14.3A

14.2A

69.5A

70.4 A

8.3A

8.7A

  1. Values followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different toDuncanʼs multiple range test