Skip to main content

Table 8 Effect of cultivars on nutritional value of snap bean pod during 2017 and 2018 seasons

From: Impact of foliar spraying of nano micronutrient fertilizers on the growth, yield, physical quality, and nutritional value of two snap bean cultivars in sandy soils

Cultivars Protein (%) Fibers (%) TSS content P (%) K (%) Zn (ppm) Mn (ppm) Fe (ppm) Cu ppm
1st season 2nd season 1st season 2nd season 1st season 2nd season 1st season 2nd season 1st season 2nd season 1st season 2nd season 1st season 2nd season 1st season 2nd Season 1st season 2nd season
Bronco 22.9B 21.8B 6.4A 6.5A 3.1B 3.4B 0.34B 0.30B 2.1B 1.5B 24.6B 27.0B 13.5B 13.4B 68.5B 70.5B 7.8B 8.1B
Flantino 27.6 A 27.9A 4.7 B 5.1B 4.0A 4.3A 0.36A 0.32A 2.2A 1.9A 27.4A 29.8A 14.3A 14.2A 69.5A 70.4 A 8.3A 8.7A
  1. Values followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different toDuncanʼs multiple range test