Evaluation | Results | Conclusions |
---|---|---|
Element + | Probing bleeding is significantly reduced (Vives-Soler and Chimenos-Küstner 2020) | More reduced tendency in cases of peri-implantitis (Vives-Soler and Chimenos-Küstner 2020) |
The probiotic reduces the adhesion of P. gingivalis to the tooth walls, thus reducing bleeding on probing (Invernici et al. 2020) | B.lactis is one of the potential probiotics as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy (Invernici et al. 2020) | |
The periodontal clinical parameter where the clinical improvements are significantly different after the application of probiotics is bleeding on probing (Patyna et al. 2021) | Probiotics are a supportive approach against inflammation and infection control of periodontal tissues (Patyna et al. 2021) | |
The reduction of probing bleeding is significantly associated with the reduction of the bacterial plaque index after the application of probiotics as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy (Bazyar et al. 2020) | Probiotics bring advantages in improving the periodontal, inflammatory and antioxidant status of patients with chronic periodontitis (Bazyar et al. 2020) | |
Seven days after the topical application of probiotics, the bleeding in the probe was significantly reduced, results that are supported even after 1 month after application (Minić et al. 2022) | Application of probiotics should be carried out topically as part of periodontal treatment (Minić et al. 2022) | |
L.reuteri redukton gjakosjen në sondim duke kontrolluar inflamaciinin gingival (Theodoro et al. 2019) | Probing bleeding is significantly reduced 90 days after the application of probiotics (Theodoro et al. 2019) | |
Element + / − | The reduction of periodontal inflammation as an effect of the probiotics used is expressed by the reduction of bleeding on probing (Ikram et al. 2019) | L. reuteri has the same effect as the use of the indicated prescription of antibiotics for chronic periodontitis (Ikram et al. 2019) |
For the reduction of bleeding on probing, L.brevis and L.plantarum bring advantages for patients with chronic periodontitis (Pudgar et al. 2021) | The number of residual areas affected by chronic periodontitis after the application of probiotics is higher than in cases of traditional non-surgical periodontal treatment (Pudgar et al. 2021) | |
Effective application of L. reuteri even in cases of peri-implantitis with a lasting effect even 90 days after application (Galofré et al. 2018) | The microbiological effect of probiotics in peri-implant cases is more limited (Galofré et al. 2018) | |
There are significant differences in probing bleeding at different intervals but not between the group where the probiotic is applied and the control group (Ghasemi et al. 2020) | Probiotics have a positive effect on periodontal indices in patients with generalized periodontitis stage III, grade A (Ghasemi et al. 2020) | |
Probing bleeding is significantly reduced after the application of oral gel with probiotics (Butera et al. 2022) | After application, gingival recession increases significantly, but without increasing the mobility of the affected tooth (Butera et al. 2022) | |
Element - | There are significant differences in probing bleeding after the application of probiotics, but these differences are not significant in the long-term effects or changes at later times after the application, regardless of the moment when the reassessment is done (Pelekos et al. 2019) | The use of probiotics did not show increased clinical effectiveness beyond the effect of non-surgical periodontal therapy (Pelekos et al. 2019) |
Results | Seven articles with positive conclusions Five articles with positive/negative conclusions One article with negative conclusions |